Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Other Aircrew Forums > Flight Testing
Reload this Page >

Tu-95 Bear propeller velocity

Wikiposts
Search
Flight Testing A forum for test pilots, flight test engineers, observers, telemetry and instrumentation engineers and anybody else involved in the demanding and complex business of testing aeroplanes, helicopters and equipment.

Tu-95 Bear propeller velocity

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 21st May 2009, 18:27
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: A hotel somewhere...
Age: 51
Posts: 32
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Tu-95 Bear propeller velocity

I was watching a documentary on the mighty Tu-95 and it was mentioned that the propeller speed at the tips are supersonic.

Is this correct? I have heard propeller and rotor tips go briefly supersonic; for example on T-6 Harvards. However I always believed that this was highly inefficient and one of the factors limiting the top speed of propeller aircraft.

Please enlighten me...

KDY

Last edited by KiloDeltaYankee; 21st May 2009 at 18:28. Reason: spelling
KiloDeltaYankee is offline  
Old 21st May 2009, 20:18
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Austria
Posts: 706
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 1 Post
Letīs see... the propeller diameter on the NK12 engine is 5,6m, which gives a radius of 17,6m. Now if the book I read is correct, the props run at 750rpm during cruise, this would make the tips of the engines run at 220m/sec. This is only the velocity along the circumference, so the vector of the arriving air has to be added to this as well. Without further calculation - at cruising altitude this easily should be supersonic.
Tu.114 is offline  
Old 21st May 2009, 21:41
  #3 (permalink)  
Per Ardua ad Astraeus
 
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: UK
Posts: 18,579
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
You could certainly hear the beast inside a pressurised cockpit through a bonedome from a good few hundred yards away, so it sure was noisy.
BOAC is offline  
Old 21st May 2009, 22:20
  #4 (permalink)  
LH2
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Abroad
Posts: 1,172
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
the propeller diameter on the NK12 engine is 5,6m, which gives a radius of 17,6m
Just to point out a typo: it's a circumference of 17.6m actually.

Not being a pedant, it's just than on first quick read it stroke me as a pretty big prop
LH2 is offline  
Old 21st May 2009, 22:27
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: east ESSEX
Posts: 4,660
Received 68 Likes on 43 Posts
Don`t know where you get the radius to be greater than the diameter! however,a TAS of 400kts at 35000` would give a tip speed of 990 ft/sec/301 m/s,and a local SoS 994 ft/sec/301 m/s..
sycamore is offline  
Old 21st May 2009, 22:31
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Austria
Posts: 706
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 1 Post
Dang... yes, of course I mean the circumference, not some magically increased radius.
Tu.114 is offline  
Old 22nd May 2009, 08:42
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Out in the sticks in DE56
Age: 85
Posts: 565
Received 6 Likes on 4 Posts
Originally Posted by KiloDeltaYankee
I have heard propeller and rotor tips go briefly supersonic; for example on T-6 Harvards. However I always believed that this was highly inefficient and one of the factors limiting the top speed of propeller aircraft.

Please enlighten me...

KDY
The inefficiency question seems the interesting bit here. Anyone...?
jimtherev is offline  
Old 3rd Oct 2010, 09:47
  #8 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Germany (North)
Age: 44
Posts: 41
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Supersonic tip speeds are not a fatal show stopper. They increase noise quite a bit. Maybe that explains the characteristic noise of the Bear.
A propeller blade is like a wing: it produces lift and induced drag. Like a normal wing it has a critical Mach number. If it approaches that Mach number or exceeds it, the drag increases dramatically. So the overall prop efficiency goes south. However, the tip of the propeller blade only contributes its part, the majority of thrust is produced more inward.

Actually, there was an aircraft with a "supersonic" propeller. It is supposed to be the noisiest aircraft ever!
Republic XF-84H - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
CabinMaster is offline  
Old 4th Oct 2010, 09:36
  #9 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: UK
Age: 69
Posts: 158
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
A hopefully 'not too bad' picture of the props on the Bear-F at Kiev Aviation Museum.

Corsairoz is offline  
Old 4th Oct 2010, 20:07
  #10 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: United Kingdom
Age: 71
Posts: 713
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I once had the pleasure of arriving at the designated Lat/Long in a TriStar tanker to dispense fuel to the (chasing) Phantoms. Having broke cloud we spotted the Bear D and took chase. My skipper was an ex Phantom driver who had previous experience of chasing these mighty propliners; anyway, we caught up with the Bear and formated off his right wing. Whilst waiting for the 'interceptors' we crossed beneath the Bear to formate on the left wing-tip... the noise from those propellors were akin to someone throwing pebbles on top of our fuselage... shock-waves from those supersonic tips!

The Phantoms arrived some ten-minutes later; took a drink, and escorted the Bear well to the north of the Shetland Isles.

A great day out!

Sadly, the skipper who I flew with on that day is no longer with us; 'Bumps' Rowley... top bloke; RIP Bumps.
TheChitterneFlyer is offline  
Old 4th Oct 2010, 20:09
  #11 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: United Kingdom
Age: 71
Posts: 713
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
TriStar? Who mentioned the mighty TriStar?

Awaiting 411A...

TCF
TheChitterneFlyer is offline  
Old 5th Oct 2010, 17:04
  #12 (permalink)  
Per Ardua ad Astraeus
 
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: UK
Posts: 18,579
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Awaiting 411A.
- did you know he has supersonic tips?
BOAC is offline  
Old 5th Oct 2010, 18:00
  #13 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Just west of the North Sea
Age: 69
Posts: 48
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Re contra rotating props. Depending on tip speeds, wouldn't there be a fair amount of blade/vortex interaction contributing to the overall noise produced? Similar to helo 'blade slap' i.e. as with the Chinook.
Coffin Dodger is offline  
Old 5th Oct 2010, 18:34
  #14 (permalink)  
Per Ardua ad Astraeus
 
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: UK
Posts: 18,579
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I would reckon the shock patterns would be a challenge to model
BOAC is offline  
Old 5th Oct 2010, 18:47
  #15 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 1,780
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Regarding the efficiency question, I wonder whether this was part of the design brief?

Perhaps the props were designed so that they were relatively efficient for take-off and initial climb, using the full span of the blades, but once the aircraft was established in high level cruise, the tips were calculated to go supersonic and reduce the effective diameter of the props?
Trim Stab is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.