Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Other Aircrew Forums > Flight Testing
Reload this Page >

Tyres Creeping on Wheel Rims

Flight Testing A forum for test pilots, flight test engineers, observers, telemetry and instrumentation engineers and anybody else involved in the demanding and complex business of testing aeroplanes, helicopters and equipment.

Tyres Creeping on Wheel Rims

Old 6th Aug 2007, 11:59
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Canberra Australia
Posts: 1,300
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Tyres Creeping on Wheel Rims

Aircraft tyres creeping on the rims.
Does this ever happen?
An F-16 pilot recently remarked that he was limited to applying full max dry power on the brakes before take off with a light aircraft as there was a risk of the tyres creeping on the wheel rims. This necessitates applying progressive AB/reheat on the roll.
Cannot believe this as there would then be a risk of tyre failure when using max braking on the move.
Perhaps he was confused with the inability of braked wheels to hold without skidding against the high thrust of current engines.
What limitations apply to which high performance aircraft to prevent tyres skidding during brake hold before take off?
Has anyone experienced tyre creep on wheel rims and if so under what circumstances?

Last edited by Milt; 6th Aug 2007 at 12:01. Reason: error in spelling
Milt is offline  
Old 6th Aug 2007, 14:09
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 1999
Location: East side of OZ
Posts: 624
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
More likely that the a/c would skid rather than cause tyre creep on the rims.

If tyre creep was going to be a problem I believe landings would be more likely to cause it than setting full thrust on the brakes.

Regards,
BH.
Bullethead is offline  
Old 7th Aug 2007, 00:59
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Hanging off the end of a thread
Posts: 32,470
Received 2,595 Likes on 1,098 Posts
Believe the Phantom was the same
NutLoose is offline  
Old 12th Aug 2007, 21:43
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Herefordshire
Posts: 153
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
All aircraft tyres will creep, even the slow ones like a Tiger Moth. They creep on initial spin-up on touch-down. If the tyres have inner-tubes then a 'creep mark' will be painted on the wheel and tyre so that the creep can be monitored. Generally the creep mark is about one inch in legnth along the wheel rim, if the tyre creeps by half this amount then the tyre will be deflated and the wheel re-set. If this is not done the wheel can sheer off the inflation valve.
Larger aircraft generally have tubeless tyres and they can creep as much as they like, so they don't have creep marks since there is no danger of the valve being sheered off.
I have never known a wheel to creep by applying full power with the brakes on. When the tyre is under a dynamic load it will grip the wheel more tightly due to its fit on the rim. It is more likely to creep under staic conditions when the tyre is 'at rest' so to speak. It is in this condition when it hits the runway and thus is more prone to creep.
On-MarkBob is offline  
Old 15th Aug 2007, 08:52
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: not where I want to be
Posts: 516
Received 42 Likes on 29 Posts
Interesting thread - I recently replaced a tube on a light twin and didn't notice any 'creep marks' but will have another look. I would have thought that at 40psi there would not be any creep to speak of, perhaps with minimal inflation one might expect it (I well recall tyre clamps to prevent it on some of my early motorbikes!).

Also have seen a number of flat-spotted tyres where people have landed with brakes on (ouch!) or run off the end of the runway, certainly no ripped valves in any of these cases so if the tyres did creep then all that baby powder did its job!
First_Principal is offline  
Old 15th Aug 2007, 12:26
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: A oneworld lounge near you
Posts: 145
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
There can be some creep on first landing after a tyre change too. In addition, you should check the tyre pressures after the first landing as there can be a loss. This appears to be just a bedding in problem and second flights are usually ok.
discountinvestigator is offline  
Old 16th Aug 2007, 04:22
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: not where I want to be
Posts: 516
Received 42 Likes on 29 Posts
FYI I recalled that I had marked the valve position on the tyre I recently changed, so that would indicate if there was any tyre creep...

I've just been down to check it and, after a dozen landings or so, there has been no creep. If I remember, and the mark stays there, I'll check it again in a few weeks
First_Principal is offline  
Old 16th Aug 2007, 05:50
  #8 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Oz
Posts: 67
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I have heard of this problem, but been cautioned about it being a problem if brakes are applied after take-off on aircraft with large, high-profile tyres. On touchdown you have the runway surface applying a change in angular momentum to the tyre (at the outside of the diameter) and the tyre bead transmitting a lesser change in angular momentum to the rim. If you apply the brakes after take-off, the opposite applies; you have a rapid change in angular momentum of the braked rim, and an even larger change in angular momentum of the high profile tyre being absorbed by the bead. Thus, we did not apply brakes before retracting gear after take-off.

The tyres had creep marks. I never saw anything written in the manuals about it.

I accept that where landing gear retracts across the lateral axis, the gyroscopic effect may be worse that the tyre creep issue. But then I've never seen an aircraft with large, high profile (high flotation) tyres that are retracted laterally. All pure speculation on my part in the absence of published warnings/cautions.
Barry Bernoulli is offline  
Old 16th Aug 2007, 07:10
  #9 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 1999
Location: East side of OZ
Posts: 624
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Back in a previous life it was standard procedure after take off to apply the brakes before the landging gear was retracted, the aircraft a Macchi MB326 jet trainer.
On the Boeings I have flown the brakes are automatically applied when the gear is retracted and if you have a brake capped due to a malfunction then there is a time limit after takeoff before the gear can be retracted.
Main gear liftoff speed, in a max weight aeroplane, is around 170kts/310kph so the gyroscopic effect would be considerable if the wheels were not braked.
Regards,
BH
Bullethead is offline  
Old 27th Aug 2007, 03:34
  #10 (permalink)  
Moderator
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Ontario, Canada
Age: 63
Posts: 5,609
Received 57 Likes on 41 Posts
The main wheels of the deHavilland Canada DHC-5 Buffalo had rather small diameter rims relative to the large, high floatation tires. As I recall, to prevent tire creep, teeth were moulded into the tire bead, and wheel rim so as to interlock upon assembly of the rims. I rode trough a number of very STOL landings and takeoffs, and was never aware of tire creep. I guess it worked!

Pilot DAR
Pilot DAR is offline  
Old 27th Aug 2007, 22:45
  #11 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: planet earth
Posts: 417
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Milt,
I have heard of tyre creep due to high power with brakes applied relating to Grumman SNJ6 type especially during carrier operations on HMAS Melbourne.
desmotronic is offline  
Old 28th Aug 2007, 02:53
  #12 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: home
Posts: 3
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Milt,
In previous life, commanded the F-16 Combined Test Force. Your F-16 friend was correct, Max AB is not allowed due to tire rotation on the stationary wheel when the brakes are set. At brake release, max AB is available immediately, all the way up to segment 5, as far as the wheels are concerned. The progression to segment 5 AB is a function of engine stall margin, not wheel/tire limits from that point on.
Cheers,
Stump
stump2 is offline  
Old 8th Oct 2007, 00:15
  #13 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Canberra Australia
Posts: 1,300
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
stump2

As an experimental TP I can hardly believe that tyre creep on an F-16's wheel rims could be assessed as acceptable.
Obvious follow on restrictions would need to be applied to max braking approaching skidding when one could expect the forces to cause tyre creep to be at a maximum.
An efficient anti skid system could hardly be trusted so close to the max braking envelope.
Also a touch of the brakes after lift off could be a hazard.

Did you know Jim Rider?
Milt is offline  
Old 8th Oct 2007, 11:01
  #14 (permalink)  

Do a Hover - it avoids G
 
Join Date: Oct 1999
Location: Chichester West Sussex UK
Age: 90
Posts: 2,206
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Milt

Sorry to be thick but I don't see why you are bothered by tyre creep (however caused) if there is no tube

JF
John Farley is offline  
Old 9th Oct 2007, 10:00
  #15 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: England
Posts: 1,075
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
I don't see why you are bothered by tyre creep (however caused) if there is no tube
If the aircraft actually starts to move forward before the pilot remembers to release the brakes, the tyres and rims will get very hot, very quickly, won't they?
ZeBedie is offline  
Old 11th Oct 2007, 11:10
  #16 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Canberra Australia
Posts: 1,300
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
ZeBedie

JF raises a good point but being tubeless then very soon after the tyre moves on the rim I reckon that the high pressure nitrogen will find ways to escape. Potential results - either a failure during the take off roll or a flat on landing.

Once did a max braking test in a heavy Valiant imparting design limiting energy to the brake units. Something like 140 million ft pnds. Two tyre failures and brake fires towards the end of the roll out. The stripped brake units looked terrible after being doused in dry powder extinguishent. The tyre carcasses seemed to be intact with failures apparently occurring at the rims or perhaps the wheel blow out plugs let go. Cannot recall the detail in the test results.
Milt is offline  
Old 20th Oct 2007, 20:54
  #17 (permalink)  
JetBlast member 2005.
JetBlast member 2006.
Banned 2007
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: The US of A - sort of
Posts: 10
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I remember reading a biography where the author mentioned that his SOP (on something large) was no braking after takeoff for this very reason, and in another book, where the author mentioned that it was the opposite (on something small) because the wheel wells were so snug that the extra diameter of the spinning tyre caused chafing.

Then I looked at my car and saw red dots which I thought must be creep marks, but the logical place would be next to the valve. I finally figured out they were marking the heaviest point so they could be mounted opposite the valve. (Why don't they mark the lightest point?)
Aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaargh! is offline  
Old 20th Oct 2007, 23:04
  #18 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Canberra Australia
Posts: 1,300
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Aaaaaaaaaa

The early Victors had a park brake lever covering the gear up button. One had to twist the park brake lever to park before retraction to ensure that the wheels would retract when not rotating. The designers had not allowed for the extra diameter of the spinning tyres or for out of balance movement.

Of course this led to the inevitable. A TP was flying a few circuits and changed his mind about gear retraction after a touch and go but after the park brake had been applied. The resultant landing spoiled his day and a multitude of tyres.

Does anyone remember how that problem was solved?
Milt is offline  
Old 21st Oct 2007, 13:07
  #19 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: England
Posts: 1,459
Received 34 Likes on 20 Posts
An underinflated tyre on a large jet is almost impossible to detect by eye and it is likely to creep so the marks might give you an early warning of a soft tyre.

Wheel braking during retraction serves a couple of functions. Firstly it stops any vibration as the gear goes into the well as this tends to scare the punters.

Most importantly if a tyre has failed on the takeoff roll it might well have long strips of tyre carcase spinning at high speed going into a wheel well lined with hydraulic reservoirs, valves, pipelines.

As a back up the Boeing 737 NG has small shear off fittings protruding below the wheel wells. If a spinning carcase hits one, it shears off dumping the hydraulic fluid from the gear retract line, the retract sequence stops keeping the damaged wheel out of the bay.

On the 737 there are no wheel doors and the wheels push up through rubberised blade seals. A spinning wheel would damage the seals as well as scaring the punters.

I believe that if you advance the throttles on a 737 with the parking brake set you trigger an audible configuration warning.

Last edited by ericferret; 21st Oct 2007 at 13:20.
ericferret is offline  
Old 22nd Oct 2007, 11:01
  #20 (permalink)  
Moderator
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Ontario, Canada
Age: 63
Posts: 5,609
Received 57 Likes on 41 Posts
I was always taught that a pilot should not jump on the brakes after takeoff, becasue the rapidly spinning tire, which had increased diameter a bit due to centrafugal force, would be a bit more loose on the bead, and could turn on a suddenly stopped rim. I take the side that even a tubeless tire should not be sliding on the rim. Something's going to get damaged, and it will be less safe.

I've seen lots of tube tires (both aircraft and otherwise) where the tire (or at least tube) has turned on the rim, and the valve stem is projecting at an odd angle.

Of course, my comment is withdrawn, if the aircraft manufacturer specifies this procedure.

Pilot DAR
Pilot DAR is offline  

Thread Tools
Search this Thread

Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.