Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Ground & Other Ops Forums > Engineers & Technicians
Reload this Page >

Hard to turn prop when engine is hot (O-235)

Wikiposts
Search
Engineers & Technicians In this day and age of increased CRM and safety awareness, a forum for the guys and girls who keep our a/c serviceable.

Hard to turn prop when engine is hot (O-235)

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 9th Jun 2010, 06:51
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Europe
Posts: 24
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Hard to turn prop when engine is hot (O-235)

Hello !

Recently we borrowed C152 from another club . After few flights one pilot reported that it takes effort of both hands and some weight to turn prop after the flight. When engine is cool the is no problem with turning the prop by hand.

Engine is 800 hrs after overhaul that was done in 2007, TT for engine is 6000 hrs. Overhaul shop owner says that there was a series of Lycoming O-235 with limited clearance on crankshaft and there is Service Letter or something to cover that topic. When asked "please give me the number of this letter" he could not remember but he says that engine is airworthy.

We made oil analysis and compression check - no problems.

Anyone of you heard something about such series of O-235 ?

thanks
Ericson is offline  
Old 9th Jun 2010, 08:34
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: By the sea
Posts: 7
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Try this

If there is a SB it should be on this: Service Bulletins - Lycoming

Rgds
glug is offline  
Old 9th Jun 2010, 23:17
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Europe
Posts: 1,416
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I was taught to give a hot prop a very wide berth. Getting both hands on it to turn one sounds dangerous to me. It might get caught in my gray beard if a cylinder fires, is how I see it.

I was grounded for a week for trying to move a nosewheel aircraft by heaving on its prop when hot.

Does that piece of ancient wisdom no longer apply?
Capot is offline  
Old 12th Jun 2010, 08:32
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Midlands
Posts: 12
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
This engine is about to fail - do not fly it & take all steps necessary to prevent it from flying - it could hurt someone.

Tightness when hot is caused by a fretted crankcase. ie the two halfes of the case have been wearing (usually at the centre main bearing), have lost material and is starting to squeeze the main bearings and crankshaft. This repidly gets worse, and what happens next? The main bearings start to rotate, oil supply to the crank is interupted - engine gets very hot - engine seizes. Game over. This will happen, and I have known this to happen from first signs to engine stoppage in less than 2hours in service.
It is fairly common and very dangerous. If your engineer says its OK - then sack him - he is wrong and being negligent.

Get the engine to an overhaul shop & tell them - fretted crankcase!
(This effects all Lycomings, but is more common on the O-235 as the design of the through studs is different to the bigger engines & is more prone to severe fretting).
Aviator1512 is offline  
Old 12th Jun 2010, 09:07
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 1999
Location: UK
Posts: 2,584
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Clearly something severely wrong, isn't there? It indicates that something inside is binding (could be any number of things), and friction like that can only produce vast amounts of localised excess heat when the engine is running. A siezure or major failure is clearly imminent.

Agree entirely with the view "don't fly it" under any circumstances. Don't even let the club you borrowed it from fly it home. Ground it.
Get it stripped down and examined!
Agaricus bisporus is offline  
Old 12th Jun 2010, 09:20
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: England
Posts: 1,459
Received 34 Likes on 20 Posts
Had a similar problem with an O-320, ended up in the overhaul shop.

What you don't do is ground it!!!!!

You will lay yourself open to a damages claim for loss of revenue e.t.c. It is the operators responsibility to deal with the problem and yours to advise them of it.

Depends on their response and attitude as to how far you go. If necessary report it to the local airworthiness authority.
ericferret is offline  
Old 12th Jun 2010, 10:01
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 1999
Location: UK
Posts: 2,584
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Eric, are you suggesting that you lay yourself open to a claim if you write an aircraft unserviceable? I've never heard such cobblers. It is your duty to declare unserviceabilities as YOU are the operator, and the scenario described above is very definately in that category. If we're going down the road of imagining unlikely legal actions what about the dependants' claims against you when you allowed them to take away an aircraft that you believed was not airworthy? That one would be far more likely to succeed.

They'd have to prove negligence, incompetence or malicious intent in your scenario which is all but impossible, and the case would cost far, far more to bring than the loss incurred. Ain't gonna happen outside the movies or an overactive imagination.
Agaricus bisporus is offline  
Old 12th Jun 2010, 11:13
  #8 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: very west
Age: 65
Posts: 262
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
"Anyone of you heard something about such series of O-235 ?"

For what ir is worth, yes I have. Came across this a number of years ago on a 235 in a Traumahawk. Aviator1512 has given you the cause far more clearly and lucidly than I could have.

If the aircraft was your own, I would support Aviator1512's statement in its entirety.

However, as you have 'borrowed' it, I would recommend in the strongest terms possible you do as Aviator 1512 says and DO NOT FLY IT. Do your very best to ensure the owner(s) actually understands this point and why. Make your point in writing to ensure your back is covered if the engine should fail when someone else is flying it (a sad reflection of our present-day litigious society).

As to the overhaul shop, could you please PM me who it is.

camlobe
camlobe is offline  
Old 14th Jun 2010, 07:29
  #9 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Europe
Posts: 24
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Thank you all for replies.

Plane is on the ground since dicovery of the problem and will be utill we know what's going on. Problem was discovered by pilot after ladning and shutdown because starter could not crank the engine due to internal friction.

Overhaul shop owner that made OH says that this engine showed such behavior before and after overhaul and it's 800 hrs past overhaul

Last edited by Ericson; 14th Jun 2010 at 07:56.
Ericson is offline  
Old 16th Jun 2010, 08:04
  #10 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: SE England
Posts: 88
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
When newer engineers than me asked me about a defect found on inspection and what should they do about it my answer would be to write it up and then we would work out if it it servicable or not and give the answer in the paperwork.
Desk Jockey is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.