Pilots Attitude To Engineering
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: London nr EGKB
Age: 32
Posts: 106
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
As a student pilot, I have a lot of respect for engineers - I can't say that engineering the aircraft is something that rocks my boat but the guys who maintain the a/c I train on are amazing > Its easy to see how long and hard they have worked to be as good as they are!
Pilots and engineers' should work and communicate hand in hand infact pilots should communicate with everyone they work with in a professional manor
Pilots and engineers' should work and communicate hand in hand infact pilots should communicate with everyone they work with in a professional manor
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: mobile
Posts: 241
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Who on earth would let a greenie go near an aircraft with a sharp object? Good God! I wouldn't let one slice bread.
As regards engineers and pilots, after 48 years in aviation I can honestly say that some of my best friends are pilots and engineers but would you let your daighter marry one ?
As regards engineers and pilots, after 48 years in aviation I can honestly say that some of my best friends are pilots and engineers but would you let your daighter marry one ?
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: belgium
Posts: 236
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
As engineer I saw and heard several things from pilots that really were not professional toward engineers. To the extend I really didn't bother fixing things properly for them. Fortunately, I changed habit in this by getting to know some pilots (I fly myself), and my view on it changed. Most pilots are good chaps but rotten apples exist, just leave them alone when they are in maintenance trouble.
On the other hand, the same goes for engineers. I've heard engineers telling the most incorrect things to pilots just to get the aircraft away. And I sometimes also am stunned by the technical knowledge some pilots have about underlying systems.
So indeed, work as a team
On the other hand, the same goes for engineers. I've heard engineers telling the most incorrect things to pilots just to get the aircraft away. And I sometimes also am stunned by the technical knowledge some pilots have about underlying systems.
So indeed, work as a team
Join Date: Sep 1999
Location: The Deep South (Sussex)
Posts: 783
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I can still remember being a young RAF pilot and having it pointed out to me that you need "O" levels to be an officer and a pilot but "A" levels to make an airman in many engineering trades.
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Wichita, USA
Age: 61
Posts: 127
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
With Tongue Firmly in Cheek
The military is taking pilots out of the cockpit and making their aircraft automated, there are however no plans to do likewise with the maintenance of the same aircraft!
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Utrecht, The Netherlands
Age: 41
Posts: 35
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I completely agree with all the posts about pilots needing engineers and vice versa, aviation is a team sport and people who don't understand that have no place in it in my honest opinion.
Also, Engineers make me laugh. At my company we have a lot to do with the engineers as the aircraft I fly are nearly (and some as) as old as I am. Usually they come up the stairs to ask us if the aircraft is good and if there weren't any major faults. As I know this I usually already say that directly after saying hello
Only last week it turned out I was mistaken...
Me: Hello! Aircraft is good!
Engineer: No it isn't...
Me: No really it's fine, no major problems (me thinking, engineer might have mixed up the aircraft)
Engineer: No really, it's f*cked
Me: Are you sure?
Engineer: Well.... it depends...
Me: On what...
Engineer: if you qualify a massive puddle of hydraulic fluid under the #1 engine and it still leaking out as no problem...
Me: *quiet and humbled again*
Also, Engineers make me laugh. At my company we have a lot to do with the engineers as the aircraft I fly are nearly (and some as) as old as I am. Usually they come up the stairs to ask us if the aircraft is good and if there weren't any major faults. As I know this I usually already say that directly after saying hello
Only last week it turned out I was mistaken...
Me: Hello! Aircraft is good!
Engineer: No it isn't...
Me: No really it's fine, no major problems (me thinking, engineer might have mixed up the aircraft)
Engineer: No really, it's f*cked
Me: Are you sure?
Engineer: Well.... it depends...
Me: On what...
Engineer: if you qualify a massive puddle of hydraulic fluid under the #1 engine and it still leaking out as no problem...
Me: *quiet and humbled again*
Join Date: May 2001
Posts: 10,815
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I am glad your peers have taken exception to that post piper19.
Rise above not sink to the level of the arseholes we all have to deal with day in day out. You will be a happier person for it.
Rise above not sink to the level of the arseholes we all have to deal with day in day out. You will be a happier person for it.
Cunning Artificer
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: The spiritual home of DeHavilland
Age: 76
Posts: 3,127
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
...if you're happy to take it we can one flight only it!'
Its OK Cap'n, it has three landings left.
(For those who don't understand, thats one landing at the destination, one for the return and a spare in case of diversion.)
Folks,
All this remind me of a long since retired BOAC/BA engineer, many years at Heathrow, always worked on contract customer's aircraft (was also a motorbike maniac, some of you may remember him) because he was so good at diplomatically handling "contract customer's crews".
He wasn't a bad AME, either.
Anyway, we arrived late one morning, having had a rudder defect in Bangkok, where BA's chaps swapped some boxes, and the defect "disappeared".
By Heathrow, now we had a another rudder defect.
On the ground, said chap, very patiently (as he always did) explained to the "engineeringly challenged Captain", ie; me, all about the defect, and what "they" had done wrong in Bangkok.
In the middle of the explanation, he realised that what he had said was a complete explanation of why what he had said could NOT be the "new" problem, and changed gears so smoothly in doing a 180, that even I was impressed. Not even a momentary pause in the flow of "explanation".
As a matter of interest, the real problem all along was not electrical/electronic/hydraulic, but a mechanical failure in a PCU, where they had never failed before, as I found out after a big delay 36 hours later.
Amazing what you find, when you get up and actually have a look. But it took an increasing less diplomatic Captain quite a while to convince "the chappies" that they were going to have to get the cherrypicker and have that look see.
Tootle pip!!
All this remind me of a long since retired BOAC/BA engineer, many years at Heathrow, always worked on contract customer's aircraft (was also a motorbike maniac, some of you may remember him) because he was so good at diplomatically handling "contract customer's crews".
He wasn't a bad AME, either.
Anyway, we arrived late one morning, having had a rudder defect in Bangkok, where BA's chaps swapped some boxes, and the defect "disappeared".
By Heathrow, now we had a another rudder defect.
On the ground, said chap, very patiently (as he always did) explained to the "engineeringly challenged Captain", ie; me, all about the defect, and what "they" had done wrong in Bangkok.
In the middle of the explanation, he realised that what he had said was a complete explanation of why what he had said could NOT be the "new" problem, and changed gears so smoothly in doing a 180, that even I was impressed. Not even a momentary pause in the flow of "explanation".
As a matter of interest, the real problem all along was not electrical/electronic/hydraulic, but a mechanical failure in a PCU, where they had never failed before, as I found out after a big delay 36 hours later.
Amazing what you find, when you get up and actually have a look. But it took an increasing less diplomatic Captain quite a while to convince "the chappies" that they were going to have to get the cherrypicker and have that look see.
Tootle pip!!
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Europe
Posts: 3,039
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I dont want this to turn into a slagging match but I am interested in how much pilots actually know about how engineering is set up and the various levels of qualifications involved.
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Somwhere with girls, wine and cars that shine..
Posts: 60
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Design Side
Design side of Engineering (Qualifications):
MINIMUM at entry-level career.
Engineer: Full-Time 3 Yrs Degree (or 3+x yrs part-time)
Pilot: Full-Time 1.5 Yrs practical flying and multiple choice box ticking.
'nuff said.
MINIMUM at entry-level career.
Engineer: Full-Time 3 Yrs Degree (or 3+x yrs part-time)
Pilot: Full-Time 1.5 Yrs practical flying and multiple choice box ticking.
'nuff said.
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Oxford, UK
Posts: 1,546
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
As the owner of a PA18 that lives a hard life as a glider tug, we could not go very far without the TLC of my engineer, a man of great experience, incredible ingenuity, absolute integrity, and all the engineering qualifications.
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: belgium
Posts: 236
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Faz1989, I meant that their comments made me feel bad at that time, not that I would have send an unsafe airplane in the air. Pwew, I hope I saved my day here. Sometimes difficult to express yourself in a foreign language.