Chrissy present for Qantas
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 8
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
QF747 Nonstop flight between England and Australia
I was wondering whether anybody could provide me with some information relating to a flight that Qantas did many years ago when they flew a 747-400 nonstop between heathrow and sydney.
They information Im after would be along the lines of:
What speed would they have been doing enroute?
What route would they have taken? In terms of countries overflown/waypoints.
Thanks
They information Im after would be along the lines of:
What speed would they have been doing enroute?
What route would they have taken? In terms of countries overflown/waypoints.
Thanks
The Reverend
Join Date: Oct 1999
Location: Sydney,NSW,Australia
Posts: 2,020
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
On August 17 1989 the first Qantas 747- 400,VH-OSA City of Canberra, touched down at Sydney airport after a non-stop flight from London to Sydney. The 18,001 km flight took 20 hours nine minutes and five seconds. Routing would have been great circle, have a look at your map.
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Sydney
Posts: 152
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
As I remember it, Australian Aviation magazine did a couple of pages article on the flight covering all aspects including the route and special fuel needed (higher SG). Try them for a back issue.
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Tamarama beach
Posts: 148
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Yes it was eclipsed by an A340 Toulouse Auckland return with minimum stop in Auckland led by Pierre Baud head of Airbus flight Op's. The aircraft was stripped of about everything to make it lighter which is not what you expect from an airliner but hell, you have to attract media attention.
What a s...T of a flight it must have been !
What a s...T of a flight it must have been !
Join Date: May 2001
Location: AUS
Posts: 218
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Half Way Around The World Is Far Enough
This is a copy of some of the things that Capt Massey-Greene wrote after the flight. The whole thing is about 9 pages long and the initial part explains the early part of travel and so on and then goes into the guts of it...
...The idea for our long range flight came origionally from a suggestion that we should fly a 747SP non-stop from London to Perth. the SP was, until development of the 747-400, the longest range commercial aircraft in the world. The SP has been used for some years by QANTAS on non stop Pacific routes from the east coast of Australia to the west coast of the USA.
The 747SP held then the current non stop distance record for a commercial aircraft. This flight by a Pratt & Whitney JT9D-7F powered SPflew a great circle distance of 8, 872nm in 17hrs, 22min with the assistance of a 36kt tail wind. Increased takeoff gross weight and the use of a 2000 USG pillow fuel tank in the cargo hold were required to achieve the flight.
The 747SP was developed in 1976 to satisfy long, thin route requirements. It was a derivative of the basic 747 with a shorter fuselage and aerodynamic improvements in the wing/body fairing and engine strut area.
The 747-400 was a new aircraft incorporating some more aerodynamic improvements such as wing tip extensions and winglets, an improved wing/body strake fairing (erived from the SP) and a re-rigged elevator. With 3000USG of fuel in the horizontal stab, and engine improvements to the RR RB211-524G engines more than offset the larger size and extra weight. This resulted in the -400 having 14% more range capability than the SP. OF this 14%, approximately 4.5% came from the aerodynamic improvements and the rest from the improved engines.
The London to Perth non-stop did not happen.
During the early planning of the 747-400 introduction, it was suggested that we should fly this aircraft from London to Sydney non-stop to promote the image of QANTAS as a pioneering long haul carrier.
Initially the idea was regarded as crazy, for the aircraft did not have enough range. THe nominal range of the -400 is 7900nm and the proposal to fly it 9700nm non-stop. Surely someone was dyslexic!
Well, not really, that 7900nm was for an aircraft with a nominal full volumetric load. What was the aircraft capable of if it was flown empty? Just over 9000nm.
Was it really possible to fly London the Sydney non-stop? QANTAS traditional flag route had always been the Kangaroo route and what a coup if we could be the first to fly it non-stop.
Not only non-stop but almost halfway around the world and between two of the most distant city pairs on the globe.
The idea began to gather momentum, and as the project pilot for the aircraft I was charged with making it happen. The non-stop part of the project was continued now in great secrecy and on a strictly need to know basis.
As with any project of this kind there will always be those who will tell you it cannot be done. I then had to adopt the approach of "Dont tell me it cant be done, tell me what we need to do."
Gradually over a period of months, we got closer and coser to this all starting to make sense. The parameters for the flight were set. It would be extremely desirable to carry some passengers (about 20), the aircraft should not be stripped, and the operational rules should not be grossly different from the norm. Impossible! "Dont strip the aircraft, add weight of passengers, that all costs fuel" said the doubters.
Boeing (only 3 people in Boeing knew of the attempt at this stage) produced some figures and charts that said it was theoretically possible. But only under ideal conditions. THe aircraft would need to be perfect and we needed a good set of engines and the winds had to be favourable.
The build of the aircraft was controllable and we could talk to RR about the engines, but the winds.........?
A study began of what winds we could expect at what perids of the year. Origionall, the first aircraft was due do be delivered in April, 1989 and that was statistically one of the better times of the year for an attempt.
RR were approached at a high level to talk about the need for a particularly good set of engines. They agreed to do whatever was possible.
A route study was done to plan the shortest possible ground miles for the flight. Numerous alternatives were also planned to allow for the best tracking on the day to take advantage of whatever winds would be blowing. Boeings origional study had been done using Great Circle distances between major city pairs along the route.
This had produced a total distance of 9505nm. We did not believe that we could obtain overflight clearances for GC tracking in todays busy skies. Utilising established airways our shortest route was 9624nm. Yet another 120nm to squeeze out of the aircraft.
Then the aircraft delivery was delayed. The further the delay, the worse the winds were likely to be. An August delivery was statistically the worst time of the year for winds.
How could we squeeze some more range out of the aircraft? We would reduce the bleed air demand from the engines for air-conditioning by operating the aircraft utilising only one of the three units. Air quality in the cabin was not a consideration with a maximum of 30 people planned to be on board. Using a single air-conditioning pack could theoretically gain us about 0.5% in range. But would the pressurisation hold at our maximum planned altitude of 45000ft wich such a low inflow? We would not know until we flew the aircraft.
We could use the fuel in the horizontal stabilizer tank to our advantage by not using it until we absolutely had to. We would run the trim in flight down to its maximum aft centre of gravity permissible. This would keep the aircraft in its most efficient trim condition and use less fuel, gaining another theoretical 0.4% in range until the tank was empty.
The weight of the aircraft had to be pared to an absolute minimum withing the bounds that had been established. The galley equipment would have to be kept to essentials only. No silver service for our VIP passengers on this flight! Water tank quantity should be the minimum required for the few on board. All non-essential equipment and the normal delivery flight stores would have to be transported to Sydney some other way - not on board as was our usual practice. Weight came down and the range edged up. Still not enough.
Fuel for the flight became the critical factor. Fuel weight is limited by tank volume, but if we could somehow make the fuel more dense then we could carry more weight of fuel and it is mass flow that affects the engines. We investigated the possibility of chilling fuel, as this would increase the density slightly. But how to chill 60000 USG and would the effect of cooling be enough? Where could we get some dense fuel? So the search began. Someone suggested we use JP10, an increadibly dense synthetic fuel used by military for some missile applications. That was no good, boeing advised, the wing structure is not designed to carry that kind of weight and besides, the winglets of this aircraft are not fitted with outrigger wheels. The search went on.
A slight increase in fuel quantity could be achieved by overfilling the fuel tanks. Normally the fuel tanks are never quite filled, to leave some airspace for expansion and prevent fuel spillage if it warmed after fuelling. By overriding the volumetric ****-off of the fuelling system, we could overfill the tanks by about 500 USG. We knew at least on airline used this procedure on a regular basis, provided fuelling was completed just prior to departure.
We kept paring weight out of the aircraft. Alll normal galley equipmet not required on the flight would be shipped to Sydney via Los Angeles. Safety equipment, except the amount required for the actual passengers on board would also be shipped. The same would apply to any cargo restraint equipment. The holds would be empty. The operating weight of the aircraft came down and the range capability edged up.
We started to run actual plans through our flight planning computer. We were tantalizingly close. The fuel for the flight was critical. The search went on......
...to be continued...
...The idea for our long range flight came origionally from a suggestion that we should fly a 747SP non-stop from London to Perth. the SP was, until development of the 747-400, the longest range commercial aircraft in the world. The SP has been used for some years by QANTAS on non stop Pacific routes from the east coast of Australia to the west coast of the USA.
The 747SP held then the current non stop distance record for a commercial aircraft. This flight by a Pratt & Whitney JT9D-7F powered SPflew a great circle distance of 8, 872nm in 17hrs, 22min with the assistance of a 36kt tail wind. Increased takeoff gross weight and the use of a 2000 USG pillow fuel tank in the cargo hold were required to achieve the flight.
The 747SP was developed in 1976 to satisfy long, thin route requirements. It was a derivative of the basic 747 with a shorter fuselage and aerodynamic improvements in the wing/body fairing and engine strut area.
The 747-400 was a new aircraft incorporating some more aerodynamic improvements such as wing tip extensions and winglets, an improved wing/body strake fairing (erived from the SP) and a re-rigged elevator. With 3000USG of fuel in the horizontal stab, and engine improvements to the RR RB211-524G engines more than offset the larger size and extra weight. This resulted in the -400 having 14% more range capability than the SP. OF this 14%, approximately 4.5% came from the aerodynamic improvements and the rest from the improved engines.
The London to Perth non-stop did not happen.
During the early planning of the 747-400 introduction, it was suggested that we should fly this aircraft from London to Sydney non-stop to promote the image of QANTAS as a pioneering long haul carrier.
Initially the idea was regarded as crazy, for the aircraft did not have enough range. THe nominal range of the -400 is 7900nm and the proposal to fly it 9700nm non-stop. Surely someone was dyslexic!
Well, not really, that 7900nm was for an aircraft with a nominal full volumetric load. What was the aircraft capable of if it was flown empty? Just over 9000nm.
Was it really possible to fly London the Sydney non-stop? QANTAS traditional flag route had always been the Kangaroo route and what a coup if we could be the first to fly it non-stop.
Not only non-stop but almost halfway around the world and between two of the most distant city pairs on the globe.
The idea began to gather momentum, and as the project pilot for the aircraft I was charged with making it happen. The non-stop part of the project was continued now in great secrecy and on a strictly need to know basis.
As with any project of this kind there will always be those who will tell you it cannot be done. I then had to adopt the approach of "Dont tell me it cant be done, tell me what we need to do."
Gradually over a period of months, we got closer and coser to this all starting to make sense. The parameters for the flight were set. It would be extremely desirable to carry some passengers (about 20), the aircraft should not be stripped, and the operational rules should not be grossly different from the norm. Impossible! "Dont strip the aircraft, add weight of passengers, that all costs fuel" said the doubters.
Boeing (only 3 people in Boeing knew of the attempt at this stage) produced some figures and charts that said it was theoretically possible. But only under ideal conditions. THe aircraft would need to be perfect and we needed a good set of engines and the winds had to be favourable.
The build of the aircraft was controllable and we could talk to RR about the engines, but the winds.........?
A study began of what winds we could expect at what perids of the year. Origionall, the first aircraft was due do be delivered in April, 1989 and that was statistically one of the better times of the year for an attempt.
RR were approached at a high level to talk about the need for a particularly good set of engines. They agreed to do whatever was possible.
A route study was done to plan the shortest possible ground miles for the flight. Numerous alternatives were also planned to allow for the best tracking on the day to take advantage of whatever winds would be blowing. Boeings origional study had been done using Great Circle distances between major city pairs along the route.
This had produced a total distance of 9505nm. We did not believe that we could obtain overflight clearances for GC tracking in todays busy skies. Utilising established airways our shortest route was 9624nm. Yet another 120nm to squeeze out of the aircraft.
Then the aircraft delivery was delayed. The further the delay, the worse the winds were likely to be. An August delivery was statistically the worst time of the year for winds.
How could we squeeze some more range out of the aircraft? We would reduce the bleed air demand from the engines for air-conditioning by operating the aircraft utilising only one of the three units. Air quality in the cabin was not a consideration with a maximum of 30 people planned to be on board. Using a single air-conditioning pack could theoretically gain us about 0.5% in range. But would the pressurisation hold at our maximum planned altitude of 45000ft wich such a low inflow? We would not know until we flew the aircraft.
We could use the fuel in the horizontal stabilizer tank to our advantage by not using it until we absolutely had to. We would run the trim in flight down to its maximum aft centre of gravity permissible. This would keep the aircraft in its most efficient trim condition and use less fuel, gaining another theoretical 0.4% in range until the tank was empty.
The weight of the aircraft had to be pared to an absolute minimum withing the bounds that had been established. The galley equipment would have to be kept to essentials only. No silver service for our VIP passengers on this flight! Water tank quantity should be the minimum required for the few on board. All non-essential equipment and the normal delivery flight stores would have to be transported to Sydney some other way - not on board as was our usual practice. Weight came down and the range edged up. Still not enough.
Fuel for the flight became the critical factor. Fuel weight is limited by tank volume, but if we could somehow make the fuel more dense then we could carry more weight of fuel and it is mass flow that affects the engines. We investigated the possibility of chilling fuel, as this would increase the density slightly. But how to chill 60000 USG and would the effect of cooling be enough? Where could we get some dense fuel? So the search began. Someone suggested we use JP10, an increadibly dense synthetic fuel used by military for some missile applications. That was no good, boeing advised, the wing structure is not designed to carry that kind of weight and besides, the winglets of this aircraft are not fitted with outrigger wheels. The search went on.
A slight increase in fuel quantity could be achieved by overfilling the fuel tanks. Normally the fuel tanks are never quite filled, to leave some airspace for expansion and prevent fuel spillage if it warmed after fuelling. By overriding the volumetric ****-off of the fuelling system, we could overfill the tanks by about 500 USG. We knew at least on airline used this procedure on a regular basis, provided fuelling was completed just prior to departure.
We kept paring weight out of the aircraft. Alll normal galley equipmet not required on the flight would be shipped to Sydney via Los Angeles. Safety equipment, except the amount required for the actual passengers on board would also be shipped. The same would apply to any cargo restraint equipment. The holds would be empty. The operating weight of the aircraft came down and the range capability edged up.
We started to run actual plans through our flight planning computer. We were tantalizingly close. The fuel for the flight was critical. The search went on......
...to be continued...
Join Date: May 2001
Location: AUS
Posts: 218
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
...continued...
Approaches were made, quietly, to various oil companies in Europe to see if they could produce the fuel we needed. One after another they said no. Even if they had the deed stock they would need to crack such an exotic brew, the 60000 USG we wanted was either too small or too large an order, and the price would be horrendous.
The fuel was all we need now to make this flight theoretically possible, but time was running out. The aircraft delivery date had now been fixed for the 9th of August. We would soon have to announce our intention and to seek the cooperation of ATC over Europe to expedite the flight and ensure we would be able to get our required route and altitude. Lower than normal altitudes would cause excessive fuel consumption and that could terminate out attempt in the very early stages of the flight. The achieved altitudes in the first two or three hours of the flight would be critical.
Because the flight was one off, we also had to obtain everflight clearances from all the countries over which we would fly, and that can take around 30 days. We needed that fuel. ***** *******, our fuel director felt his telephone bill would keep OTC going for many years.
Behind all this was some doubt about how the aircraft would actually perform. We would not know until we flew it across to London and actually measured its performance. One percent in fuel mileage could make the difference, and that kind of variation from aircraft to aircraft was not unusual.
Finally Shell said they could make the fuel. At last! We could now announce the flight and start real preparations. Shell then said they would move to make the fuel in West Germany because that was where the feed stock was. How would we transport the fuel to London? Tankers we said. Not that easy they said, we dont have them to spare. Another hurdle. Then we found some tankers, not the usual behemoths, small ones, but tankers nonetheless. Nine would be required.
By this stage I was in Seattle preparing for the aircraft acceptance and delivery. Weekly conference calls and other ad hoc calls were keeping the telephone lines warm smoothing out the final details
The pieces were starting to fall into place. An enormous effort by what was now a fairly large team of people, all experts in their own speciality. But how would the aircraft perform? The las unknown. Were our calcualtions correct? We would not know for sure until we flew the aircraft to London from Seattle. That would be the final test.
The aircraft delivery was going to be delayedabout a week because of some late part supplies to Boeing. Reorganise the schedule, use up the pads I had built in and reschedule the departure date from London a couple of days back. Could we ahcieve the necessary crew training in one day instead of three? Yes, it could all be done and the overflight clearances were still valid. We could still achieve a weekday departure from London (necessary because of congestion over europe during weekends caused by the incredible number of charter flights taking tourists to and from holiday resorts in the height of summer) and a weekday arrival into Sydney.
Shell announced another small hitch with that all essential fuel. It had been prepared in two bathces and they would not mix. Soulution, put it all in a rail tanker and shunt it up and down a sliding to shake it up. A gigantic cocktail shaker! It worked. The resultant fuel was analyzed and thei final master stroke - this special brew not only complied with the civil Jet A1 specification, but it also had some very special characteristics. It was as dense as that specification allowed and it had an extraordinary freeze point. I told shell it had to have a freeze point of at least -50*c to stop the fuel freezing in the tanks during a very long flight at the expected cold temperatures. Shell said they had tested it to -70*c and would that do, or did i want them to test it further. Since the coldest OAT temperature that I had ever seen was -69*c and the fuel should not get much colder than -40*c i said that -70*c was probably about enough. They shipped the fuel to London.
The delivery of the aircraft came and went with a few hitches, but nothing serious. We completed our training and set off to London with one of the most experienced and high level crews that QANTAS had ever assembled. With me now for the flight to London and for the non-stop were:-
Ray Heiniger - then - Flight Operations Training Director
Rob Greenop - then - Flight Standards and Safety Director
George Lindeman - then - Manager Flight Simulators
We also had Captain Chet Chester from Boeing as an additional pilot for the long flight. Also on board were Jim Clarke, Manager Performance Engineering and a performance engineer from Boeing and one from RR.
The aircraft performed flawlessly during that flight. Once the performance engineers had processed their observations through a lap-top computer in London, they announced that it was that critical one percent better than we had expected.
The London to Sydney non-stop was now GO!
On the strength of the positive news about the performance, i agreed to allow one mroe passenger on the flight. The total on board would now be 23, comprising 5 pilots, 2 cabin crew and 16 passengers. I was to wonder about adding that extra passenger about half way throught he flight.
On the day of the flight the wind forecast was teh worst that we had seen for some weeks the overall component was only +14kts and we had been seeing upwards of +20. However, the forecast for Sydney was good and we still had adequate reserves of fuel.
The fuelling which had been substatially carried out the day before was completed. Each tank was filled until it overflowed out the wing tip vents with a fire truck standing by to wash away any spilt fuel.
My feeling of relief was substantial when the first engine started normally. Although there was no reason to doubt that they would start this was the first time this fuel had been used.
The cooperations we recieved from ATC and the authorities generally was absolutely superb. It all started with our departure from London when ATC allowed us to be towed out to the runway which saved us about 1/2 tonne of fuel. They also made our slot for departure on the arrival runway so our departure wouldnot be delayed. We recieved all the route and altitude clearances that were needed even across the incredibly busy skies of central europe. ATC in all countries displayed interest in our flight, wished us well with a couple passing official greetings from their government.
All went totally according to Hoyle, until we passed over Muscat. About then we climbed to 37000 ft and the winds, already forecast to be headwinds proved to be much stronger than we had expected. Which just goes to prove that weather forcasting is not yet an exact science. These adverse winds persisted for about 3 hours until we passed Colombo. During this time we could do nothing but watch as our fuel reserve started to diminish
Then over the Cocus Island and now at 41000 ft we were passed a revised forecast for Sydney. It was not the sort of news I wanted to hear at that stage of the flight with our already reduced fuel reserve. The forecast was for INTER TS about the time of our arrival. That meant that we had to have an additional thirty minutes of reserve fuel above our minimum reserve of 30 min. Simply, at that stage, we did not have even 30 minutes of reserve fuel let alone 60.
Fortunately, the winds had already swung around to the tail and started to become stronger than forecast. We began to make up lost time and our fuel situation started to improve.
We flew on knowing that the weather in Adelaide and Melbourne was good incase the weather in Sydney turned really foul but, it would be a real dissapointment not to make our objective. To say nothing of the fact that I had been told not to expect to fly home on the aircraft if we did divert. Our director of Flight Operations had made it known that he considered a bus much more appropriate form of transport if we did not make Sydney.
Overhead Adleaide and now flying at 45000 ft (or nearly 14km high) the winds continued to be more favourable than forecast and we recieved a revised forecast for Sydney which changed the TS to heavy showers. The import of this was that we no longer needed that extra 30 min of reserve fuel. Sydney was now assured!
I was to discover later, that some negotiation had been going on between our Director of FLight Operations and the weather forecasters to see if they would consider removing the mention of TS from that earlier forecast. They agreed to do this, and at about the time this converstaion was finishing there was an enourmous thunderclap at Mascot. This was heard over the phone by the weather man who exclaimed "What the **** was that?" Legend has it that the response was somehting to the effect that no-one at Mascot heard anything, and the weather man must be hearing things.
The rest is history, except to say that our welcome in Sydney exceeded anything I had expected. To see so many people waiting for us as we turned the corner around the hangar onto the QANTAS maintenance area was a very humbling experience.
We arrived in Sydney with 5.6 tonnes (or just over 45 min) of fuel remaining of the 183.5 tonnes we had on borad out of London.
20 hrs 9 min and 5 sec after liftoff at London and almost half a world away, we ahcieved that which we set out to achieve many months before. Two world records and two Australian records were set in the process. It was an enourmous sense of achievement for me and the whole team who had worked on this project....
....That for the most part is all of what he wrote. Hope it was intersting for you all - took bloody long enough to type it out
Twin
The fuel was all we need now to make this flight theoretically possible, but time was running out. The aircraft delivery date had now been fixed for the 9th of August. We would soon have to announce our intention and to seek the cooperation of ATC over Europe to expedite the flight and ensure we would be able to get our required route and altitude. Lower than normal altitudes would cause excessive fuel consumption and that could terminate out attempt in the very early stages of the flight. The achieved altitudes in the first two or three hours of the flight would be critical.
Because the flight was one off, we also had to obtain everflight clearances from all the countries over which we would fly, and that can take around 30 days. We needed that fuel. ***** *******, our fuel director felt his telephone bill would keep OTC going for many years.
Behind all this was some doubt about how the aircraft would actually perform. We would not know until we flew it across to London and actually measured its performance. One percent in fuel mileage could make the difference, and that kind of variation from aircraft to aircraft was not unusual.
Finally Shell said they could make the fuel. At last! We could now announce the flight and start real preparations. Shell then said they would move to make the fuel in West Germany because that was where the feed stock was. How would we transport the fuel to London? Tankers we said. Not that easy they said, we dont have them to spare. Another hurdle. Then we found some tankers, not the usual behemoths, small ones, but tankers nonetheless. Nine would be required.
By this stage I was in Seattle preparing for the aircraft acceptance and delivery. Weekly conference calls and other ad hoc calls were keeping the telephone lines warm smoothing out the final details
The pieces were starting to fall into place. An enormous effort by what was now a fairly large team of people, all experts in their own speciality. But how would the aircraft perform? The las unknown. Were our calcualtions correct? We would not know for sure until we flew the aircraft to London from Seattle. That would be the final test.
The aircraft delivery was going to be delayedabout a week because of some late part supplies to Boeing. Reorganise the schedule, use up the pads I had built in and reschedule the departure date from London a couple of days back. Could we ahcieve the necessary crew training in one day instead of three? Yes, it could all be done and the overflight clearances were still valid. We could still achieve a weekday departure from London (necessary because of congestion over europe during weekends caused by the incredible number of charter flights taking tourists to and from holiday resorts in the height of summer) and a weekday arrival into Sydney.
Shell announced another small hitch with that all essential fuel. It had been prepared in two bathces and they would not mix. Soulution, put it all in a rail tanker and shunt it up and down a sliding to shake it up. A gigantic cocktail shaker! It worked. The resultant fuel was analyzed and thei final master stroke - this special brew not only complied with the civil Jet A1 specification, but it also had some very special characteristics. It was as dense as that specification allowed and it had an extraordinary freeze point. I told shell it had to have a freeze point of at least -50*c to stop the fuel freezing in the tanks during a very long flight at the expected cold temperatures. Shell said they had tested it to -70*c and would that do, or did i want them to test it further. Since the coldest OAT temperature that I had ever seen was -69*c and the fuel should not get much colder than -40*c i said that -70*c was probably about enough. They shipped the fuel to London.
The delivery of the aircraft came and went with a few hitches, but nothing serious. We completed our training and set off to London with one of the most experienced and high level crews that QANTAS had ever assembled. With me now for the flight to London and for the non-stop were:-
Ray Heiniger - then - Flight Operations Training Director
Rob Greenop - then - Flight Standards and Safety Director
George Lindeman - then - Manager Flight Simulators
We also had Captain Chet Chester from Boeing as an additional pilot for the long flight. Also on board were Jim Clarke, Manager Performance Engineering and a performance engineer from Boeing and one from RR.
The aircraft performed flawlessly during that flight. Once the performance engineers had processed their observations through a lap-top computer in London, they announced that it was that critical one percent better than we had expected.
The London to Sydney non-stop was now GO!
On the strength of the positive news about the performance, i agreed to allow one mroe passenger on the flight. The total on board would now be 23, comprising 5 pilots, 2 cabin crew and 16 passengers. I was to wonder about adding that extra passenger about half way throught he flight.
On the day of the flight the wind forecast was teh worst that we had seen for some weeks the overall component was only +14kts and we had been seeing upwards of +20. However, the forecast for Sydney was good and we still had adequate reserves of fuel.
The fuelling which had been substatially carried out the day before was completed. Each tank was filled until it overflowed out the wing tip vents with a fire truck standing by to wash away any spilt fuel.
My feeling of relief was substantial when the first engine started normally. Although there was no reason to doubt that they would start this was the first time this fuel had been used.
The cooperations we recieved from ATC and the authorities generally was absolutely superb. It all started with our departure from London when ATC allowed us to be towed out to the runway which saved us about 1/2 tonne of fuel. They also made our slot for departure on the arrival runway so our departure wouldnot be delayed. We recieved all the route and altitude clearances that were needed even across the incredibly busy skies of central europe. ATC in all countries displayed interest in our flight, wished us well with a couple passing official greetings from their government.
All went totally according to Hoyle, until we passed over Muscat. About then we climbed to 37000 ft and the winds, already forecast to be headwinds proved to be much stronger than we had expected. Which just goes to prove that weather forcasting is not yet an exact science. These adverse winds persisted for about 3 hours until we passed Colombo. During this time we could do nothing but watch as our fuel reserve started to diminish
Then over the Cocus Island and now at 41000 ft we were passed a revised forecast for Sydney. It was not the sort of news I wanted to hear at that stage of the flight with our already reduced fuel reserve. The forecast was for INTER TS about the time of our arrival. That meant that we had to have an additional thirty minutes of reserve fuel above our minimum reserve of 30 min. Simply, at that stage, we did not have even 30 minutes of reserve fuel let alone 60.
Fortunately, the winds had already swung around to the tail and started to become stronger than forecast. We began to make up lost time and our fuel situation started to improve.
We flew on knowing that the weather in Adelaide and Melbourne was good incase the weather in Sydney turned really foul but, it would be a real dissapointment not to make our objective. To say nothing of the fact that I had been told not to expect to fly home on the aircraft if we did divert. Our director of Flight Operations had made it known that he considered a bus much more appropriate form of transport if we did not make Sydney.
Overhead Adleaide and now flying at 45000 ft (or nearly 14km high) the winds continued to be more favourable than forecast and we recieved a revised forecast for Sydney which changed the TS to heavy showers. The import of this was that we no longer needed that extra 30 min of reserve fuel. Sydney was now assured!
I was to discover later, that some negotiation had been going on between our Director of FLight Operations and the weather forecasters to see if they would consider removing the mention of TS from that earlier forecast. They agreed to do this, and at about the time this converstaion was finishing there was an enourmous thunderclap at Mascot. This was heard over the phone by the weather man who exclaimed "What the **** was that?" Legend has it that the response was somehting to the effect that no-one at Mascot heard anything, and the weather man must be hearing things.
The rest is history, except to say that our welcome in Sydney exceeded anything I had expected. To see so many people waiting for us as we turned the corner around the hangar onto the QANTAS maintenance area was a very humbling experience.
We arrived in Sydney with 5.6 tonnes (or just over 45 min) of fuel remaining of the 183.5 tonnes we had on borad out of London.
20 hrs 9 min and 5 sec after liftoff at London and almost half a world away, we ahcieved that which we set out to achieve many months before. Two world records and two Australian records were set in the process. It was an enourmous sense of achievement for me and the whole team who had worked on this project....
....That for the most part is all of what he wrote. Hope it was intersting for you all - took bloody long enough to type it out
Twin
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: They seek him here, they seek him there
Posts: 141
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Ever Again?
It is a fascinating story no matter which way, or how many times, it is told.
Given Qantas' transformation from Government Enterprise to Public Company in the intervening period, are we likely to see them attempt a record flight again?
The cynical side of me thinks not. In the eyes of the bean counters, the cost(s) of such a venture would probably not be worth the benefits.
Of course I would be delighted to be proven wrong, particularly on the delivery flight of any 737 NG aircraft.
Given Qantas' transformation from Government Enterprise to Public Company in the intervening period, are we likely to see them attempt a record flight again?
The cynical side of me thinks not. In the eyes of the bean counters, the cost(s) of such a venture would probably not be worth the benefits.
Of course I would be delighted to be proven wrong, particularly on the delivery flight of any 737 NG aircraft.
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: The Burrow, N53:48:02 W1:48:57, The Tin Tent - EGBS, EGBO
Posts: 2,297
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
As someone who has more than once been a passenger on OJA I too am delighted to have more than the bare bones of the story. Thank you very much!
Nunc est bibendum
Gary, considering our CEOs ability to dress up 707s, 744s, classics and 738s in different colour schemes and a few other things along the way, I'd be surprised if he WASN'T interested in something like this again.
Thanks Twin, see your Private messages.
Thanks Twin, see your Private messages.
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 8
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
That was awesome reading, thanks for that!
So I suppose it wouldnt have done a great circle route? if it went over colomobo and the cocos islands?
Anyone wouldnt have a listening of the countries it overflew would they?
So I suppose it wouldnt have done a great circle route? if it went over colomobo and the cocos islands?
Anyone wouldnt have a listening of the countries it overflew would they?
Join Date: May 2001
Location: AUS
Posts: 218
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From the route map that I've got -
London - Frankfurt - Istanbul - Ankara - Tehran - Oman - Colombo - Cocos Islands - Carnarvon - Sydney
There are no doubt some other points along the way but dont have those anywhere.....anyone else out there with them???
Twin
London - Frankfurt - Istanbul - Ankara - Tehran - Oman - Colombo - Cocos Islands - Carnarvon - Sydney
There are no doubt some other points along the way but dont have those anywhere.....anyone else out there with them???
Twin