PPRuNe Forums

PPRuNe Forums (https://www.pprune.org/)
-   Computer/Internet Issues & Troubleshooting (https://www.pprune.org/computer-internet-issues-troubleshooting-46/)
-   -   Another Windows oddity? (https://www.pprune.org/computer-internet-issues-troubleshooting/298517-another-windows-oddity.html)

frostbite 31st October 2007 21:00

Another Windows oddity?
 
My desktop has six USB ports, 2 front, 4 rear, all designated as USB2.0.

Because the rear ones are inconvenient and because I'm lazy I've put a 4-way hub in one of the front ones. Nearly every time I connect anything there's a message telling me that I will do better connecting to a 2.0 port.

The list of ports then presented totals 8, so obviously including the hub, which is rated 2.0.

Something else to just live with?

unclenelli 31st October 2007 21:20

Your hub is USB 1.1

frostbite 31st October 2007 22:28

No, as I said, the hub is rated 2.0.

BOAC 31st October 2007 22:43

Should that not be 9 ports?

bnt 31st October 2007 23:01

I've had this kind of setup before, and it worked as USB2... but it was only temporary. I won't put a USB2 disk behind a hub if it can be avoided - why put an extra device in the chain if you don't have to?

Saab Dastard 31st October 2007 23:52

Is the hub powered independently or via the USB port it's plugged into?

SD

reynoldsno1 1st November 2007 00:13

I have a Seagate external HDD, and the installation requires it to be connected to the rear USB ports ONLY - all my ports are 2.0, but perhaps some are more equal then others....

Bushfiva 1st November 2007 01:37


rear USB ports ONLY
Physically, the rear ports tend to be sat on the motherboard and so are known to be 2.0-compliant. The front ports are generally connected to the motherboard header by wiring which can sometimes fall out of spec.

Seagate specifies "rear ports" because on some older systems the front ports are 1.1 and the customer doesn't realise this, and on some systems they're 2.0 but cause problems with fast devices (see above). Finally, on some motherboards only the rear ports are root hubs, so anything sensitive to not being connected to a root hub will have problems with the front ports anyway. Finally finally, since the rear ports are root hubs, they are not sharing bandwidth so the external drive can perform as advertised.

reynoldsno1 1st November 2007 03:20

Tks for that Bf - now I know....:ok:

Saab Dastard 1st November 2007 09:39

I have one of these 2-port USB extenders to present 2 of the the 4 rear USB ports to the front:

http://www.maplin.co.uk/module.aspx?...=1m11#overview

It works fine with USB 2 devices (hard disks & removable storage devices).

SD

frostbite 1st November 2007 12:44

Thanks for all the replies.

The hub is powered from the USB port (front) and it sounds as if moving it to the rear port might produce better results.

Certainly plenty of useful info there to consider.

Saab Dastard 1st November 2007 13:14


The hub is powered from the USB port
That can often be the problem, as the one port has to power all the devices on the hub, resulting in insufficient voltage to devices. USB devices are sensitive to the voltage available when they negotiate with the port at start. A powered hub might cure the problem, but extending the ports from the rear is a sure-fire fix.

SD


All times are GMT. The time now is 12:17.


Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.