Linux Corner
Official PPRuNe Chaplain
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Witnesham, Suffolk
Age: 80
Posts: 3,498
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Canon printers and Linux don't mix well.
My HP Laserjet works fine (via the network) from my Linux machine.
My Canon ip4000 will NOT. Mind you, its Windows drivers are over 50 MB so there's something odd about it.
There are some cobbled Linux drivers that will produce output from the Canon, but it's not to the standard the machine is capable of.
My HP Laserjet works fine (via the network) from my Linux machine.
My Canon ip4000 will NOT. Mind you, its Windows drivers are over 50 MB so there's something odd about it.
There are some cobbled Linux drivers that will produce output from the Canon, but it's not to the standard the machine is capable of.
Join Date: May 1999
Location: At Home
Posts: 67
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
My sincere thanks to all of you who have replied (wipe that smile off your face Wombat!). I have checked out all the links provided and have reluctantly decided not to continue the struggle until I need a new printer.
I still find it very strange that the OS effortlessly achieved what I thought would be problematic and then failed to cope with a printer produced in the tens of thousands by a major manufacturer.
As suggested by Mac The Knife I contacted Canon to point out the lack of a manufacturer's Linux driver and their reply was rather less than helpful.
So, Bill, it looks like the Wombat has the last laugh and I'm back with you.
Shaky
(W3.0 - WXP and still hating it)
I still find it very strange that the OS effortlessly achieved what I thought would be problematic and then failed to cope with a printer produced in the tens of thousands by a major manufacturer.
As suggested by Mac The Knife I contacted Canon to point out the lack of a manufacturer's Linux driver and their reply was rather less than helpful.
Thank you for your E-mail inquiry.
At his point Linux drivers are not available for Canon products.
There is no information available to indicate that plans exist to develop
Linux drivers.
Should you require further assistance, please feel free to email us or
visit our customer support website at http://www.canon.ca
Sincerely,
At his point Linux drivers are not available for Canon products.
There is no information available to indicate that plans exist to develop
Linux drivers.
Should you require further assistance, please feel free to email us or
visit our customer support website at http://www.canon.ca
Sincerely,
Shaky
(W3.0 - WXP and still hating it)
Official PPRuNe Chaplain
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Witnesham, Suffolk
Age: 80
Posts: 3,498
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I think, if the Windows driver is small, there's likely to be a Linux one. When you get to Canon, things are different.
"If anyone can, Canon can" is a bit of a two-edged sword.
If/when the senior folks hear that customers are complaining, something might happen - as Mac said.
"If anyone can, Canon can" is a bit of a two-edged sword.
If/when the senior folks hear that customers are complaining, something might happen - as Mac said.
Bludger extraordinaire
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: London/Frankfurt
Posts: 194
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
shaky
I am sorry that you have had bad luck.
We take it for granted now that printers will be compatible with a given OS. Unless you are using BGware, that will be the case for some time in the future.
That does not mean that they cannot be used. Before the Intarweb thing really came into being, people like I had to wade through Big Thick Manuals and ask friends how a Thai character set could be put through mumble-mumble systems and produce Thai at the other end. My lead programmer spent 36 hours straight on that baby.
The beauty is that this information is now shared. People whom you will never know have put countless hours' effort into breaking through. Even if it is fruitless, imagine how good you'll feel if did you crack it - and can tell every other MP700 user how it's done - and what you experienced?
You have nothing to lose but your BSODs
BOFH
I am sorry that you have had bad luck.
We take it for granted now that printers will be compatible with a given OS. Unless you are using BGware, that will be the case for some time in the future.
That does not mean that they cannot be used. Before the Intarweb thing really came into being, people like I had to wade through Big Thick Manuals and ask friends how a Thai character set could be put through mumble-mumble systems and produce Thai at the other end. My lead programmer spent 36 hours straight on that baby.
The beauty is that this information is now shared. People whom you will never know have put countless hours' effort into breaking through. Even if it is fruitless, imagine how good you'll feel if did you crack it - and can tell every other MP700 user how it's done - and what you experienced?
You have nothing to lose but your BSODs
BOFH
Plastic PPRuNer
Turboprint, which rotorcraig mentioned - http://www.turboprint.de/english.html - allegedly supports the MP700 - I don't know how good it is.
Canon give more Linux support than it seems, but only on their Japanese website.
Canon's Linux drivers page is at [3], if you can parse or guess your way through Japanese.
If you can't, there's some discussion at [4].
Debian and Ubuntu (Mepis is Ubuntu based) repackaging of the CUPs drivers by Takushi Miyoshi is at [7]. He's even rewritten the pstocanon[bi]j program and PPDs supplied by Canon, since the supplied ones crashed for him and the source was apparently awful.
[1] http://lists.freestandards.org/piper...04/001528.html
[2] ftp://download.canon.jp/pub/driver/bj/linux/
[3] http://cweb.canon.jp/drv-upd/bj/other.html#linux
[4] http://www.suseforums.net/lofiversio...hp/t16956.html
[5] http://download.canon.jp/pub/driver/...2.2-1.i386.rpm
[6] http://download.canon.jp/pub/driver/...2.2-1.i386.rpm
[7] http://mambo.kuhp.kyoto-u.ac.jp/~takushi/
You might even try emailing Takushi at the address given in [7]
That's based on half-an-hour of Googling. The long and the short of it seems to be that if you spend a few days hunting and farting around trying various drivers you should get at least basic functionality working and maybe more. Whether you've got the time for that is another matter.
If I had an equivalent Canon printer I'd do it for you, if only to wipe the glee off Gertie's face.
Microsoft's monopoly and their pressure on manufacturers not to support other OSes is the real problem, so Windows isn't much of a solution.
Canon give more Linux support than it seems, but only on their Japanese website.
Canon's Linux drivers page is at [3], if you can parse or guess your way through Japanese.
If you can't, there's some discussion at [4].
Debian and Ubuntu (Mepis is Ubuntu based) repackaging of the CUPs drivers by Takushi Miyoshi is at [7]. He's even rewritten the pstocanon[bi]j program and PPDs supplied by Canon, since the supplied ones crashed for him and the source was apparently awful.
[1] http://lists.freestandards.org/piper...04/001528.html
[2] ftp://download.canon.jp/pub/driver/bj/linux/
[3] http://cweb.canon.jp/drv-upd/bj/other.html#linux
[4] http://www.suseforums.net/lofiversio...hp/t16956.html
[5] http://download.canon.jp/pub/driver/...2.2-1.i386.rpm
[6] http://download.canon.jp/pub/driver/...2.2-1.i386.rpm
[7] http://mambo.kuhp.kyoto-u.ac.jp/~takushi/
You might even try emailing Takushi at the address given in [7]
That's based on half-an-hour of Googling. The long and the short of it seems to be that if you spend a few days hunting and farting around trying various drivers you should get at least basic functionality working and maybe more. Whether you've got the time for that is another matter.
If I had an equivalent Canon printer I'd do it for you, if only to wipe the glee off Gertie's face.
Microsoft's monopoly and their pressure on manufacturers not to support other OSes is the real problem, so Windows isn't much of a solution.
Official PPRuNe Chaplain
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Witnesham, Suffolk
Age: 80
Posts: 3,498
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
While I sit and do the mail, the Linux machine the other side of the study is updating its software and installing a dozen or so packages for me to try out - including Audacity (which I use a lot on the PC), WinAmp, and Bluetooth networking.
All free (sorry, but the authors made them that way), and all automatically downloaded and installed from a single menu listing all the software available from a list of sources.
Not bad, I reckon.
All free (sorry, but the authors made them that way), and all automatically downloaded and installed from a single menu listing all the software available from a list of sources.
Not bad, I reckon.
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: France
Posts: 69
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I use SimplyMEPIS 6.0 almost exclusively (except for updating the TomTom). Linux is not meant to be a rival to Windows, but an alternative OS.
If Windows does what you want, or you don't like getting your fingers dirty, or PCs leave you cold, then stick to Windows.
If you want control of your computer back, are fed up with viruses, malware, spyware, BSOD, lack of control, costs et al., then seriously investigate the many distributions of Linux.
And it's all comprehensive and free.
PS - Look at all the OS queries on this forum. What are virtually all connected with? Windows?
If Windows does what you want, or you don't like getting your fingers dirty, or PCs leave you cold, then stick to Windows.
If you want control of your computer back, are fed up with viruses, malware, spyware, BSOD, lack of control, costs et al., then seriously investigate the many distributions of Linux.
And it's all comprehensive and free.
PS - Look at all the OS queries on this forum. What are virtually all connected with? Windows?
Oh Shazbat!
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Leeds, UK
Age: 64
Posts: 239
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Tiggermoth
Use search and you'll find several threads about Linux & Windows and how the differences manifest themselves.
The big thing I would say is that it down to how much you want to use your PC quickly and how much you want to support it yourself. Try Mepis or Ubuntu, you can load off the CD and try it out without having to install on your hard drive to see if you like it.
To give an example the PC I use has Windows XP & Ubuntu 6.10. Win XP loads & I can get the driver support for my Wireless card loaded - time to get it up and running and ready to go was about 2 hours.
Ubuntu took a lot of work to get the wireless adaptor in place, including loading source code and compiling the code. Similarly getting media working took a long time - so time to get it up & running at the same level as Windows was probably abut 10 hours plus I had to have access to the internet in order to get access to the internet.
I've said it before & I'll say it again - if you want an easy life, it can't be guaranteed with Linux to the same extent as it can with Windows. But if you have patience, and want to learn something about computers & software then Linux is a much better place to learn - just be prepared for it to take time.
Use search and you'll find several threads about Linux & Windows and how the differences manifest themselves.
The big thing I would say is that it down to how much you want to use your PC quickly and how much you want to support it yourself. Try Mepis or Ubuntu, you can load off the CD and try it out without having to install on your hard drive to see if you like it.
To give an example the PC I use has Windows XP & Ubuntu 6.10. Win XP loads & I can get the driver support for my Wireless card loaded - time to get it up and running and ready to go was about 2 hours.
Ubuntu took a lot of work to get the wireless adaptor in place, including loading source code and compiling the code. Similarly getting media working took a long time - so time to get it up & running at the same level as Windows was probably abut 10 hours plus I had to have access to the internet in order to get access to the internet.
I've said it before & I'll say it again - if you want an easy life, it can't be guaranteed with Linux to the same extent as it can with Windows. But if you have patience, and want to learn something about computers & software then Linux is a much better place to learn - just be prepared for it to take time.
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Cambridge, England, EU
Posts: 3,443
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
Yes, I've got a Linux box on my desk at work.
I use it to run various servers that are written for Linux. It doesn't have a keyboard, mouse or screen - when I want to talk to it directly (rather than through the various proprietory protocols to the servers in question) I open up a telnet window on my Windows box, when I want to edit files on the Linux box I use a Windows editor (to be sure, it helps to pick one that knows about Unix line endings).
Actually I do sometimes connect a screen to it, to see why it won't boot, which it doesn't about three times out of four (but the opinion of the IT guys is that that's down to a hardware issue rather than Linux). As it's starting up thousands of lines of incomprehensible gobbledegook scroll up the screen, mostly containing the words "fatal error" ... but once it's started doing that I know it's booting OK so unplug the monitor again.
It works reasonably well (execpt for the booting problem which is probably hardware). Every few weeks something breaks in the networking software, and I have to get the IT guys to fix it (something to do with domain trusts, it needs a network admin password so I can't do it myself), but no big deal.
I use it to run various servers that are written for Linux. It doesn't have a keyboard, mouse or screen - when I want to talk to it directly (rather than through the various proprietory protocols to the servers in question) I open up a telnet window on my Windows box, when I want to edit files on the Linux box I use a Windows editor (to be sure, it helps to pick one that knows about Unix line endings).
Actually I do sometimes connect a screen to it, to see why it won't boot, which it doesn't about three times out of four (but the opinion of the IT guys is that that's down to a hardware issue rather than Linux). As it's starting up thousands of lines of incomprehensible gobbledegook scroll up the screen, mostly containing the words "fatal error" ... but once it's started doing that I know it's booting OK so unplug the monitor again.
It works reasonably well (execpt for the booting problem which is probably hardware). Every few weeks something breaks in the networking software, and I have to get the IT guys to fix it (something to do with domain trusts, it needs a network admin password so I can't do it myself), but no big deal.
Official PPRuNe Chaplain
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Witnesham, Suffolk
Age: 80
Posts: 3,498
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I've got a machine running Linux in my study. It's my previous desktop machine, now relegated to Linux tinkering box and fileserver. It's never switched off, hasn't crashed or misbehaved since I set it up, and works flawlessly.
It runs Fedora core 5, which seems to be totally stable - certainly far more stable and reliable than Windows on the main PC - and a lot faster, too.
It does have a keyboard and a (very old LCD) monitor, although the monitor is usually in standby mode and blank.
Linux is a bit harder to set up than Windows (or was for me, anyway, although there are those who will tell you I did it all wrong). Once done, it's excellent.
It runs Fedora core 5, which seems to be totally stable - certainly far more stable and reliable than Windows on the main PC - and a lot faster, too.
It does have a keyboard and a (very old LCD) monitor, although the monitor is usually in standby mode and blank.
Linux is a bit harder to set up than Windows (or was for me, anyway, although there are those who will tell you I did it all wrong). Once done, it's excellent.
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Deepest Europe...
Age: 39
Posts: 224
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Not a regular user, but I've used Knoppix to save files to a USB drive on more than one occasion when the OS on the primary hard disk has got corrupted, won't boot and needs reformatting... does this count? I don't know much about Linux and needed help when using the command prompt but I loved the Knoppix GUI. When I reformat my other computer soon I'll look at dual-booting it with WinXP and Linux.
Join Date: Dec 1997
Location: Suffolk UK
Posts: 4,927
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I'd like to have a play with Linux. I even have a spare laptop to do it on, and a copy of MepisLite. Trouble is, the laptop - which used to be a W98SE machine - was experimentally upgraded to XP, and now it won't complete the boot-up procedure! It is a bit weedy - 400Mhz Celeron, 256mb RAM and 4 Gb HDD. I'd like - if I can just work out how - to strip Windows off the machine and try Linux just for a bit of fun. But can I format the bloody thing? I probably can, but I haven't worked out how....
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Northampton UK
Posts: 537
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I've got an Ubuntu Unix server at home to hold my mail, photos, music etc.
The wife & kids access it from their Windows PC, I rebuilt my PC as a Unix machine months ago and have had no reason go back to Windows since.
As others have said, it may take you time to get wireless drivers, graphics accelerators, etc. working and if you're not a hands on PC techy then you will probably need to find a friend who is to help you.
But once it's all up and working you will find it to be very reliable.
RC
The wife & kids access it from their Windows PC, I rebuilt my PC as a Unix machine months ago and have had no reason go back to Windows since.
As others have said, it may take you time to get wireless drivers, graphics accelerators, etc. working and if you're not a hands on PC techy then you will probably need to find a friend who is to help you.
But once it's all up and working you will find it to be very reliable.
RC
Bludger extraordinaire
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: London/Frankfurt
Posts: 194
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Linux tries me every day - but that's my job. 
Having Exploder run at 20% on a dual CPU machine all day today is also my job.
There will be frustrations whichever route you choose, If you care to pay for them, so be it.
BOFH
Having Exploder run at 20% on a dual CPU machine all day today is also my job.
There will be frustrations whichever route you choose, If you care to pay for them, so be it.
BOFH
Official PPRuNe Chaplain
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Witnesham, Suffolk
Age: 80
Posts: 3,498
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by scroggs
But can I format the bloody thing? I probably can, but I haven't worked out how....
Once I'd deleted the existing partition, I set the machine to boot first from CDROM (Press F1 or whatever at boot-up) and installed from a Linux CD.
I told it to configure for multiple boot, using GRUB. There are now 3 hard drives in there, and nine partitions with various stuff on them. Default boot is Fedora Core 5, but there are several other Linuxes. It's a 600MHz Pentium, and runs about as fast in Fedora as the main desktop running XP - that's a 3.2GHz. Such is the Windows "overhead".
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Euroville
Posts: 455
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Dell gives the go-ahead for Linux
I found this interesting. I am a fairly average home computer user. I have never received any formal training, self taught. Use the computer for home use, photography, music, bit of video editing.
I am becoming more and more disillusioned with Microsoft products. It seems hard to believe that a company with this much of the market share, amount of money, amount of resources still puts out products with poor security and loads of bugs like Vista.
I am now certain after recent developments with Vista, and the huge expense of purchasing it along with extremely high system requirements required to run it, and my experiences with Apple after owning two iPods is that my next computer purchase will not be running on Windows.
I feel that it will probably be a Mac but now there is a very real chance of it being a Linux box.
I wonder how many other home users are thinking the same? Is the tide beginning to turn against Microsoft?
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/technology/6506027.stm
Dell gives the go-ahead for Linux
Larry Ellison of Oracle stands in front of a linux poster
Large firms like Oracle use open source Linux software
Computer giant Dell will start to sell PCs preinstalled with open source Linux operating systems, the firm has said.
The second largest computer maker in the world said it had chosen to offer Linux in response to customer demand.
Earlier this year, 100,000 people took part in a Dell survey. More than 70% of respondents said they would use Linux.
Dell has not released details of which versions of Linux it will use or which computers it will run on, but promised an update in the coming weeks.
"Dell has heard you," said a statement on the firm's website. "Our first step in this effort is offering Linux preinstalled on select desktop and notebook systems."
Currently the company only offers Microsoft Windows on its computers, but sells servers running Linux.
Members of the Linux community welcomed the move.
The fact that Dell is offering a desktop with Linux is no surprise
Nick Veitch
Nick Veitch, senior editor of Linux Format magazine, described it as "significant".
"I think it sends a message in two ways," he said.
"One is that a major company is confident enough to be able to offer Linux preinstalled on a desktop - that sends a signal that Linux is usable to the average user - and I think it shows that there is a growing demand for an alternative to Windows."
'No surprise'
Microsoft is the world's largest software maker and its proprietary Windows operating system is found on nine out of every 10 personal computers.
Dell laptop, Getty
Dell currently only offers Windows software on its laptops
While companies such as Microsoft earn money by licensing and charging for use of their products, Linux code is freely available.
That means anyone can modify it or develop applications for it. As a result, there are many different types, or distributions, of Linux operating systems that offer different functionality.
As Linux is free to download and distribute, the exact numbers of users is difficult to quantify.
However, analysts believe that approximately 6% of computers users run Linux, similar to the numbers choosing Apple Macs.
Big business and governments, particularly in the developing world, are also starting to exploit the flexibility of open source code.
The UK Cabinet Office recently evaluated the operating system and approved it as a viable alternative to proprietary systems. Car manufacturer Peugeot has also rolled it out across its employees' desktop computers.
But until now there has not been a major computer manufacturer willing to preinstall Linux on consumer computers.
"The fact that Dell is offering a desktop with Linux is no surprise," said Mr Veitch.
"The surprise is that it has taken them this long."
I am becoming more and more disillusioned with Microsoft products. It seems hard to believe that a company with this much of the market share, amount of money, amount of resources still puts out products with poor security and loads of bugs like Vista.
I am now certain after recent developments with Vista, and the huge expense of purchasing it along with extremely high system requirements required to run it, and my experiences with Apple after owning two iPods is that my next computer purchase will not be running on Windows.
I feel that it will probably be a Mac but now there is a very real chance of it being a Linux box.
I wonder how many other home users are thinking the same? Is the tide beginning to turn against Microsoft?
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/technology/6506027.stm
Dell gives the go-ahead for Linux
Larry Ellison of Oracle stands in front of a linux poster
Large firms like Oracle use open source Linux software
Computer giant Dell will start to sell PCs preinstalled with open source Linux operating systems, the firm has said.
The second largest computer maker in the world said it had chosen to offer Linux in response to customer demand.
Earlier this year, 100,000 people took part in a Dell survey. More than 70% of respondents said they would use Linux.
Dell has not released details of which versions of Linux it will use or which computers it will run on, but promised an update in the coming weeks.
"Dell has heard you," said a statement on the firm's website. "Our first step in this effort is offering Linux preinstalled on select desktop and notebook systems."
Currently the company only offers Microsoft Windows on its computers, but sells servers running Linux.
Members of the Linux community welcomed the move.
The fact that Dell is offering a desktop with Linux is no surprise
Nick Veitch
Nick Veitch, senior editor of Linux Format magazine, described it as "significant".
"I think it sends a message in two ways," he said.
"One is that a major company is confident enough to be able to offer Linux preinstalled on a desktop - that sends a signal that Linux is usable to the average user - and I think it shows that there is a growing demand for an alternative to Windows."
'No surprise'
Microsoft is the world's largest software maker and its proprietary Windows operating system is found on nine out of every 10 personal computers.
Dell laptop, Getty
Dell currently only offers Windows software on its laptops
While companies such as Microsoft earn money by licensing and charging for use of their products, Linux code is freely available.
That means anyone can modify it or develop applications for it. As a result, there are many different types, or distributions, of Linux operating systems that offer different functionality.
As Linux is free to download and distribute, the exact numbers of users is difficult to quantify.
However, analysts believe that approximately 6% of computers users run Linux, similar to the numbers choosing Apple Macs.
Big business and governments, particularly in the developing world, are also starting to exploit the flexibility of open source code.
The UK Cabinet Office recently evaluated the operating system and approved it as a viable alternative to proprietary systems. Car manufacturer Peugeot has also rolled it out across its employees' desktop computers.
But until now there has not been a major computer manufacturer willing to preinstall Linux on consumer computers.
"The fact that Dell is offering a desktop with Linux is no surprise," said Mr Veitch.
"The surprise is that it has taken them this long."
Plastic PPRuNer
Some of us switched quite a while ago......
I don't really have much of a quarrel with XP, despite its insecurities and quirks - my own installations, with a bit of care and feeding, have been very stable - but I really do have a problem with Microsoft's greed, arrogance and truly unpleasant and antisocial business practices.
arcniz put it very well in a previous thread.
<snip> "The net-net-net reason that history will not remember Bill Gates fondly is... that he used the early success of his company to capture and hijack the entire destiny of computing for a period of decades.. the echos will continue into the next century, for sure. In the process he directed a program of obfuscation, disruption and proprietisation of the whole of computing technology - for no purpose other than the financial and commercial benefit of Microsoft. This continues into the present day.
Of all the profit taken in by MSFT, only a tiny fraction - say ten or fifteen percent (of the net profit) has been used to actually make software more productive, more reliable, and more useful. The remainder of those vast profits applied to development have been directed to creating and amplifying methods for making present and future computer programs more dependent on technology owned or controlled by Microsoft. This leads to greatly inferior software, but software that makes its customers totally and perpetually dependent on MSFT for tools, methods, and applications that can only be used under the intellectual property rights controlled by MSFT. One can say much about why this is bad, but in the interests of brevity I will just sum up as follows:
Bill Gates did not single-handedly invent modern computing. In fact, he waged business warfare on other innovators and companies in the early days of computing to the extent that most were effectively prevented from operating in markets that Gates sought to control. The business practices of Microsoft, guided by Bill Gates, have deliberately, methodically, and unnecessarily wasted the time and diminished the efforts of every one touched by them. The social and economic cost of his self-serving (and largely unnecessary) actions has been to deprive humanity of (at least) hundreds of billions of productive work hours, expended for totally unnecessary and wasteful work by the planet's best educated and potentially most productive citizens... for no purpose except to serve the greed of Gates and his cohort. The effect is equivalent, in economic and social cost around the globe, to exterminating millions of people. No small beans. To make recompense for that He'll have to feed a great many orphans."
By all means get a Mac (they're brilliant), but with every passing day Linux (my machines run either Kubuntu or Mepis as "best of breed" distros) becomes an increasingly compelling (and significantly cheaper) alternative.
I don't really have much of a quarrel with XP, despite its insecurities and quirks - my own installations, with a bit of care and feeding, have been very stable - but I really do have a problem with Microsoft's greed, arrogance and truly unpleasant and antisocial business practices.
arcniz put it very well in a previous thread.
<snip> "The net-net-net reason that history will not remember Bill Gates fondly is... that he used the early success of his company to capture and hijack the entire destiny of computing for a period of decades.. the echos will continue into the next century, for sure. In the process he directed a program of obfuscation, disruption and proprietisation of the whole of computing technology - for no purpose other than the financial and commercial benefit of Microsoft. This continues into the present day.
Of all the profit taken in by MSFT, only a tiny fraction - say ten or fifteen percent (of the net profit) has been used to actually make software more productive, more reliable, and more useful. The remainder of those vast profits applied to development have been directed to creating and amplifying methods for making present and future computer programs more dependent on technology owned or controlled by Microsoft. This leads to greatly inferior software, but software that makes its customers totally and perpetually dependent on MSFT for tools, methods, and applications that can only be used under the intellectual property rights controlled by MSFT. One can say much about why this is bad, but in the interests of brevity I will just sum up as follows:
Bill Gates did not single-handedly invent modern computing. In fact, he waged business warfare on other innovators and companies in the early days of computing to the extent that most were effectively prevented from operating in markets that Gates sought to control. The business practices of Microsoft, guided by Bill Gates, have deliberately, methodically, and unnecessarily wasted the time and diminished the efforts of every one touched by them. The social and economic cost of his self-serving (and largely unnecessary) actions has been to deprive humanity of (at least) hundreds of billions of productive work hours, expended for totally unnecessary and wasteful work by the planet's best educated and potentially most productive citizens... for no purpose except to serve the greed of Gates and his cohort. The effect is equivalent, in economic and social cost around the globe, to exterminating millions of people. No small beans. To make recompense for that He'll have to feed a great many orphans."
By all means get a Mac (they're brilliant), but with every passing day Linux (my machines run either Kubuntu or Mepis as "best of breed" distros) becomes an increasingly compelling (and significantly cheaper) alternative.
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Norwich, UK
Posts: 496
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I run a Dell 9400 lappie...
If i'm honest i'd probably swap to Linux...
...if I knew how and wasnt scared of ballsing up the set up I have now!
Anything not MS must be good though.
If i'm honest i'd probably swap to Linux...
...if I knew how and wasnt scared of ballsing up the set up I have now!
Anything not MS must be good though.