Flight Training for a U.S. citizen in Canada
 

Might be posted to Vancouver as my firm wants to set up an office there. Still want to continue training (currently PPL, and some odd 200 hours).

Where can I find information about flight training in Canada for U.S. citizens? For those of you who have done it - any suggestions?

Thanks in advance for your replies.

shon7
 

Try www.prowings.bc.ca This is a flying school close to Vancouver. They should be able to give you some answers. Good Luck.:cool:

Lucky chap.

If you're in central Vancouver you'll probably find your nearest flight schools to be in Boundary Bay (www.czbb.com), which has a whole load of them. It's about a forty minute drive from downtown. It's also a short hop from there to Bellingham or Friday Harbour if you're in the mood for some N registered action.

A couple of schools I'm happy to recommend would be

Pacific Flying Club - www.pacificflying.com
Regency Express - www.regencyexpress.com

You also might like to look at

Pro IFR/VFR - www.proifr.com

I'm sure a quick call to any of the above would answer any questions you may have. Other local airfields with flying clubs are Pitt Meadows and Langley.

Good luck! SSS

re:I find information about flight training in Canada for U.S. citizens
 

There are several excellent places to obtain training here in Canada. And, our government won't treat you like a terrorist, demand a FBI security check, and make it nearly impossible for you to continue your career.

Have a nice day...

Prof,
There is a reason they do all that and given the results not unreasonable. Perhaps abit OTT right now but it will settle down with time.

Not justified
 

"There is a reason they do all that and given the results not unreasonable."

Sorry mate. The current US policy is COMPLETELY unreasonable. Addtionally, it will affect Canadian pilots for years.

Imagine this. You need a Type rating for your up-grade, but you can't go to training because you don't have a type rating! Have you figured this out yet?

And for those of us lucku enough to be carrying a few T/R's around...What will the next piece of US policy be?

Again mate, my appologies, but NOTHING the US does which pertains to policy is considered reasonable!

:eek:

More recommendations
 

My two cents worth:

Two thumbs DOWN for Regency Express...they have a bad reputation in the industry, regardless how nice they try to make it look. Bad words have been equated to that operation, sadly. :eek:

TWO thumbs UP - WAY UP - for Pro (Professional) IFR. Don't know their Boundary Bay phone number (or their main YVR one for that matter) but check on line for them. That's a great operation headed by a sincerely enthusiastic, excellent, and knowledgeable owner...ask for John.
:)


You've been posted to one of the nicest cities in the world. Good luck and have fun! Let us know how it goes!!
:D

Prof,
What would your suggestion be then, to avoid giving training to someone who will then try to murder as many people as possible? I was down in the US in last Dec to do my ATPL and had no problems at all.
Some type of screening is not unreasonable. If it was not done and another incident occurred what then would be the rammifications? Everyone would jump up and down shouting how the government failed to act.
Once you have the background check done I don't believe you need to do it again for subsequent training. Yes, it is a pain in the arse, but I for one am prepared to be patient for the better and protection of the masses.
Now if we could convince them to ban high powered sniper rifles;)

Prof:

Maybe you would prefeer that the USA become a haven for terrorists like Your beloved Canada huh?

Cat Driver:

Ray Darr:

I agree John is a real asset to the training industry, they don't come any better.

Cat Driver:

Chuck,
Canada is NOT a haven for terrorists. That is a rather silly thing to say. Given that you live on the island I am rather surprized you would say such a thing.

Saudipc-9:

I suggest you have a good look at Canadas immigration policies with regard to refugee claims, then check with the statements that are being made by top officials in the USA.

Canadas borders are considered as porious at best when it comes to undesireables entering Canada.

Maybe the heat has affected your thinking? I found that over 50 C thinking gets real fuzzy. :D :eek:

Cat Driver:

Chuck,
Well if the comments are made by top officials in the US then by golly they must be right!!!:rolleyes:
Canada's immigration policies are no great shakes but the US has alot of gaps too. This when they extend the visa of one of the terrorists two months after that person had flown one of the jets into the WTC. How many illegal immigrants are there in the US? Millions!!! I spent abit of time in Texas and know a porious border when I see one!!!! They have no right to criticize Canadian policies when their own are seriously lacking.
To be honest both countries need to revamp policies and procedures. We have allowed far to many immigrants in with very shady back grounds and we are paying the price for it now.

50 C Yep and God I love A/C.:D

Sau...

I spent a lot of time in Jeddah and 50 C was brutal.:D
You are of course right about the immigration thing, they both have problems.

C.D.

Pretty ignorant post, Chuck. Shame on you! :(

To get back to the question posed by shon7: take a look at this Transport Canada website: http://www.tc.gc.ca/civilaviation/ge...onnel/fore.htm

Also, here is where you can find a list of flight schools:
http://www.atac.ca/Learn_To_Fly/scho...x.html#western

Hope this helps. B.C. is a beautiful place, enjoy! :)

P.S. For what it's worth, I too have heard bad things about Regency. No firsthand experience and I don't know the specifics, so take this comment with a grain of salt.

Now look at the mess I've created
 

I agree that some form of screening is acceptable. But, the current policy is WAY overboard.

Simply, a professional pilot (Which are the one's I was talking about) attending a COMPANY sponsored training event, should not have to be subjected to this requirement.

In answer to the original question - A big thumbs up for PRO IFR. You can now do an FAA commercail there as well. Email them for information - [email protected] They have a excellent reputation.

MLS-12D:

Ignorant?

Why would you call me ignorant for stating a well known fact.

Canada's immigration policies are porous to say the least, maybe you could have a look at how some of the other countries around the world screen anyone who show up at their immigration check points.

Try Saudi Arabia for a start.

You take care now. :D

Cat Driver:
.........
:D The hardest thing about flying is knowing when to say no. :D

Hello Chuck,

Your comment that the USA needs its current visa regime in order "(not to) become a haven for terrorists like (our) beloved Canada" assumes the following: (1) that Canada is a haven for terrorists; (2) that the USA is not; and (3) that the USA will not experience any problems if it tightens its borders.

There is little doubt that Canada has a considerable number of undesirables who are left more or less unmolested by the authorities (RCMP and CSIS asleep at the switch once again). However, we're nowhere near as bad as the UK. Further, we don't seem to have people sending letterbombs, or carrying out ramdom sniping, or blowing up federal buildings, etc.: all of which activities have been perpetrated by US citizens in the last few years (note that I didn't mention the anthrax thing, because we still don't know who is behind that).

While I am no supporter of our ridiculous immigration laws, I can't agree that any of your premises are valid. They are particularly objectionable because they implicitly support the common American belief that Sept. 11th was carried out by terrorists who came into the country undetected from Canada: a theory that was carefully investigated by the authorities and was found not the case.

OK MLS-12D:

I agree, Canada has not slipped down to the level of the UK immigration problem, but does that change the slack policies that Canada has?

How about the guy the US immigration caught crossing on the Washington ferry from Canada with explosives on his way to LAX to blow up part of the airport?

Seems to me he is a radical Islamic terrorist who was part of a cell operating in Canada, in fact seems he made his explosives in Vancouver before crossing into the US. So what exactly is wrong with my premises?

You still have not convinced me that I am in fact " ignorant "

How about you and your views? Surley you must know Canada is a good entry point for anyone wishing to escape into the general population while our innefficient Government bureaucrats check them out as to validity of their regugee claims.

But of course we must not violate their "rights" hell no we just let them get back to work making weapons to kill us.

We just see things through a different perspective MLS-12D.

P.S.

Every time I arrive Heathrow or Gatwick I look around and think I have arrived in the wrong country. :D

Cat Driver:

Chuck,

I gave up on the UK a long time ago, after they joined the EC and cast off their economic links to Canada, Oz, S. Africa and NZ (that's our thanks for standing by them in two world wars). Who knows why they prefer to chum up to the former Axis powers? :rolleyes:

Certainly there is the notorious example of that psycho on the ferry; but surely that solitary case does not mean that we are a haven for terrorists. I don't believe it justifies tightening the border between the two best neighbours in the word, which costs both Canada and the USA a lot of money.

MLS-12D

P.S. It is HUGHLY ironic that I'm put in the position of having to defend our crazy immigration situation. :D Personally I'm quite reactionary, and I have little sympathy for all of these people that we seem hell-bent on admitting to Canada.