Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Other Aircrew Forums > Cabin Crew
Reload this Page >

BA CC industrial relations (current airline staff only)

Wikiposts
Search
Cabin Crew Where professional flight attendants discuss matters that affect our jobs & lives.

BA CC industrial relations (current airline staff only)

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 7th Mar 2011, 11:14
  #3381 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: essex
Posts: 178
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Licence

Sorry to butt in.

CC are licensed to work on aircraft after undergoing the required training. (verb - permitted or allowed)

As such they have licence to do so.(noun - figurative - permission)

What they don't possess is a piece of paper that says e.g. 'Crew Operating Licence for Fokker Friendship' on it.(noun - tangible - self-explanatory)

Hope that helps.

PS a private messager even more pedantic than I points out that training and attestation to it is the only requirement by law for CC to operate. So, CC definitely never possess a Licence as such, as opposed to pilots who are required to.

Hope that helps more.

Last edited by mrpony; 7th Mar 2011 at 12:04.
mrpony is offline  
Old 7th Mar 2011, 19:03
  #3382 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: motorway services
Posts: 118
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Mrpony: I too am confused when I hear BA cabin crew refer to their licence. (Ask to see it!)

I had to refer to the GCSE English website when I read MissM's post:

Licence is a noun, license is a verb. Before learning to drive, you apply for a provisional driving licence, but the DVLA must license you to drive.
Apologies to our friends in the USA where they use "license" as a noun.

Enough thread creep perhaps, how is the ballot going?
strikemaster82 is offline  
Old 7th Mar 2011, 21:26
  #3383 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: M3 usually!
Posts: 491
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The concept of a "license" has been introduced as part of the "bigging up" process.
Deep sigh - When I started flying a quarter of a century ago, it was a licence and it was a little yellow cardboard booklet which stated 'CAA cabin crew licence' on it and the name of the airline, in my case British Caledonian, within its covers was a list of all aircraft types you were qualified to operate on. I still have it together with a nice navy blue OAA licence which was issued to me on completion of my Gulf Air SEP exams. So while I'm sure you are correct in that they are no longer considered to be licences, they certainly were once! Should you feel you really need to see it to believe it, then pm me and I will e-mail a photocopy of it. When we refer to licences then, it is due to historical terms of reference.

What I fail to understand is why it upsets you all so much? What can it possibly matter what qualification we have to operate an aircraft or what name we give it? It is just a name - get over it because we have this same discussion every couple of thousand posts! It really does appear to be petty and small minded.
ottergirl is offline  
Old 7th Mar 2011, 21:36
  #3384 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Planet Moo Moo
Posts: 1,279
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Ottergirl,

To be honest, as flight crew, I don't really care, most of us don't really care infact no-one apart from the most pedantic care.

As long as you are qualified to operate the hardware you are on then that is good enough for me. I have to have a smelly green folder in the rare case the CAA/Local Authorities wish to see it, you need only to be certified by the company to operate. That is all.

So, can we now get on with the discussion? Where does the recent court ruling on non eligible ballots leave BASSA/Unite as the majority of injunctions were based on that premise?
Wirbelsturm is offline  
Old 7th Mar 2011, 21:37
  #3385 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: essex
Posts: 178
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
ottergirl

I think the wording of the legislation must have made it confusing for people. Agreed it doesn't matter a jot.
mrpony is offline  
Old 8th Mar 2011, 08:32
  #3386 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: UK
Age: 64
Posts: 3,586
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Well thank God we've resolved that one at last! Moving on...
TightSlot is offline  
Old 8th Mar 2011, 11:54
  #3387 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: UK
Posts: 15
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
What is the timescale for the current ballot, please? Also, does anyone have an indication of which way the ballot will go?
Thanks.
Barbosa
CaptainBarbosa is offline  
Old 8th Mar 2011, 13:24
  #3388 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: UK
Posts: 458
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
does anyone have an indication of which way the ballot will go?
I have a view….

I think that voting for a strike that your leader has already said probably won’t result in a strike and even if it does most likely won’t result in you actually striking, will generate a yes majority of those that are still in the union and bother to vote.

I personally don’t think there is much doubt about that. I also think that any result generated under such circumstances has absolutely no meaning whatsoever.
Snas is offline  
Old 8th Mar 2011, 15:06
  #3389 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: in a house
Posts: 131
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
What is the timescale for the current ballot, please? Also, does anyone have an indication of which way the ballot will go?
The ballot closes 28 march. I'm with Snas. Glorious leader says that it wont go to a strike - majority vote for strike - Glorious leader calls for a strike - Majority come to work
essessdeedee is offline  
Old 8th Mar 2011, 17:56
  #3390 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: UK
Posts: 15
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Thank you.
CaptainBarbosa is offline  
Old 8th Mar 2011, 18:06
  #3391 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Somewhere in between
Posts: 108
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
So what's happening with the accounts saga? Anyone any further with the 28 day legal time span to see the books?

Show me the money!
Dutchjock is offline  
Old 8th Mar 2011, 21:04
  #3392 (permalink)  
Couldonlyaffordafiver
 
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: The Twilight Zone near 30W
Posts: 1,934
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I vote for Snas. Suffice to say, the numbers of those who vote and the numbers of those who walk are likely to be very different.
Human Factor is offline  
Old 8th Mar 2011, 21:52
  #3393 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: sussex
Posts: 613
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Interesting to note that the company is latching on to all things Conservative at the moment

Having shafted everyones pensions by switching from RPI to CPI the talk from Mp's today on the police is 'why should anyone get a yearly pay scale rise for doing the same job'

What betting 'pay scales at BA to be reviewed'
stormin norman is offline  
Old 9th Mar 2011, 00:12
  #3394 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: LHR
Posts: 170
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Stormin' - it's definitely on the agenda. If you can get on the intranet, the People dept's Inform newsletter for January 2010 mentions moving from an entitlement culture to a culture where pay is earned. This was in relation to the A-scales but you can be sure other areas would have been in the frame eventually. However, this was during Tony McCarthy's tenure and it remains to be seen if this has changed at all. I suspect not.
BikerMark is offline  
Old 9th Mar 2011, 10:25
  #3395 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Uk
Posts: 109
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
With every thing else going on in the "Bassa V's BA fight" have Bassa informed the membership of the flight time limitation changes that are being pushed forward by EASA supported by ALL european airlines NOT JUST BA.
If these changes happen we can all say goodbye to our lives as we know it today.

Our agreements WILL BE CHANGED BY IMPOSITION


Crews I have spoken to have no idea its on its way, I hope they do not represent the majority of the work force, but if they are then the union has really let its members down..
ltn and beyond is offline  
Old 9th Mar 2011, 10:58
  #3396 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: LHR
Posts: 111
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
EASA Proposals

Spot on Ltn & Beyond.

The changes being proposed by EASA are going to change all of our lives if they are implemented..... 7Hr 30 Minimum Rest anybody?

BALPA have thoroughly briefed the membership about the proposed changes and how we can formally object. Has BASSA been so thorough?

Ignore this at your peril, the HMRC debacle should not be allowed to repeat itself - the unions have a responsibilty to keep their membership informed of all matters that affect the members.

Tunnel vision?????
Flap33 is offline  
Old 9th Mar 2011, 14:46
  #3397 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: the edge of reason
Posts: 214
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Too late, consultation finishes on 20th March 2011.

Whilst BASSA has been fiddling around at Bedfont and dreaming up squalid campaigns for their members whilst simultaneously lying to them, the Elephant in the room is going to have far more impact on the working lives of their members than taking the CSD out of the office ever did.

Members should be sueing them for wilful neglect!
Bengerman is offline  
Old 9th Mar 2011, 17:02
  #3398 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: St. John's Wood
Posts: 322
Received 24 Likes on 4 Posts
EASA FTL proposals will never have been on BASSA or Unite's radars. Lets face it, DH, LM & Co can't spell EASA, never mind know whats coming. They are too busy attempting to push their trite and irrelevant agenda.
Abbey Road is offline  
Old 9th Mar 2011, 17:42
  #3399 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 1999
Location: UK
Posts: 285
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I've even heard some CC welcoming the idea of doing extra hours so they can earn more money!!
fruitbat is offline  
Old 10th Mar 2011, 07:48
  #3400 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: maidenhead
Posts: 941
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Angel

I would just like to make a point that some of you seem to be forgetting with regards to WW and E/F cabin crew.

We work to separate agreements to scheme which can only be altered with the agreement of our representatives (Bassa and Amicus at present). Although we work within scheme rules, sometimes our own agreements are more restrictive, such as how much rest we get after a flight and how many total hours we can work in a 5, 6 or 7 day period for example on E/F and days off after trips ( Minimum base turnarounds) for WW etc.

So unlike Mixed Fleet and our pilot colleagues who work to scheme rules, the only thing affecting WW and E/F crew will be the total number of hours per year of 900 at present and in the past there was no limit and we functioned fine then.

I have not been happy with Bassa's performance during this strike but I am sure they are aware of the changes of this legislation and have been looking at how this will affect cabin crew. They are not completely useless!

I have myself signed the offer and it specifically says that BA will honour my current working agreements and they will remain the same unless amended through negotiation.

Just my take on the situation, not the views of BA.
Betty girl is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.