Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Other Aircrew Forums > Cabin Crew
Reload this Page >

British Airways - CC Industrial Relations Mk VI

Cabin Crew Where professional flight attendants discuss matters that affect our jobs & lives.

British Airways - CC Industrial Relations Mk VI

Old 4th Mar 2010, 13:20
  #1861 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Hessle, UK
Posts: 3
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
so once again no posts between 0530 and 1320 what the f!
Something wrong with the clock Finnster - look at posts 1846 (11.18) and 1847 (03.50)
searbyb is offline  
Old 4th Mar 2010, 13:22
  #1862 (permalink)  
Moderator
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Feb 1998
Location: Europe
Posts: 3,051
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Finnster, please note that for the past few years, the PPRuNe clock has been out of whack more often than not. This issue has evaded the boffins at IB, PPRuNe“s owners, despite many attempts at fixing it.
FYI.

flapsforty
flapsforty is offline  
Old 4th Mar 2010, 14:30
  #1863 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Out and About
Posts: 268
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The following (which I note contains no denial of the 2.5hrs in 2.5weeks claim) is live on the cc89/amicus website:

4th March 2010

Joint Statement From Your Reps at the TUC


As you will have seen, yesterday our Chief Executive made a number of statements during his industrial relations update which was broadcast across our business.

At the time of the update your reps were present at the TUC attempting to negotiate with British Airways. The content of his speech was both surprising and disappointing to us both in its tone and content. A number of times Mr. Walsh made statements regarding the conduct of the negotiations which were blatantly untrue, and can have been designed solely as an attempt to undermine our solidarity. The assertion that the two committees are not united can be seen to be untrue - those present at the meeting at Kempton Park could plainly see that the committees are as united as ever.

Mr. Walsh claimed that 'internal disagreements have left us unable to maintain a common position'. This is a blatant LIE. We have been in constant session since January under the chairmanship of the TUC following the normal protocol of negotiations of this nature. We have made ourselves available at any time since then. Despite our offers to continue talks BA has chosen to leave the building at 6pm or earlier on numerous occasions. Various documents have been passed across the table for review by either side. Both branches of Unite have been sitting together and working jointly towards a mutually acceptable agreement in the best interests of the crew.

The constant press briefing, whispering campaign and overt spoiling coming out of the BA hierarchy is doing nothing less than moving any agreement further out of reach. It is blatantly apparent that Mr. Walsh is not being kept abreast of the developments at the TUC. In due course it will become clear how out of touch that he is.

The psychological warfare that the company is waging against the community is designed to cow you into submission and stop you standing up for yourself. Let the following statement give you strength when all you are hearing from the company are lies, half truths and threats:


Amicus and BASSA - United We Stand!

Lizanne Malone
Duncan Holley
Nigel Stott
Blair Veakins
Chris Harrison
Adam Marley
Adrian Smith
Marcel Devereux
Bob McCullum
Debbie Warren-Price
Garly Newley
Anna Roffey
Iain Tanner
Paul Taylor

Len Mc Clusky
Paul Talbot

Steve Turner
Brian Boyd

. COST SAVING TALKS PAGE 2
TorC is offline  
Old 4th Mar 2010, 14:37
  #1864 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: UK
Posts: 219
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Both branches of Unite have been sitting together and working jointly towards a mutually acceptable agreement in the best interests of the crew.
It doesn't actually say they were sitting together when negotiating with BA though, does it?
Papillon is offline  
Old 4th Mar 2010, 14:42
  #1865 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Hamptonne
Posts: 384
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Watersidewonker

You are playing a now you see me, now you don't game! You post then delete. For those of us that aren't online to PPRuNe 24/7 it is a little annoying that posters refer to your post that has miraculously disappeared. If you have something valid to say, say it and don't delete it so we can all see what you are saying so that we can respond as appropriate!
While I am not defending Watersidewonker, have you considered that it is not impossible that a moderator might have deleted his/her messages?

Just a thought.
Chuchinchow is offline  
Old 4th Mar 2010, 14:43
  #1866 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: London
Age: 53
Posts: 90
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Wascrew

Wascrew....sorry,things move along pretty fast here on Pprune!

You suggested that NewFleet as a seperate fleet was part of every BA offer...
Could I draw your attention to this quote from the BA's June 2009 offer to Unite..

Bill Francis, in an ESS offer sent to all Cabin Crew stated:
I accepted Unite’s informal proposal of an integrated approach for all main crew recruited at Heathrow
May I refer you to my post #1833 which contains the whole text.

For the whole of the period between June & October 6th 2009, BA offered a deal with no seperate New Fleet.

How many crew even know this?
dave747436 is offline  
Old 4th Mar 2010, 15:02
  #1867 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: The Basque Country
Age: 75
Posts: 87
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by baggersup
Well, the piccie of Mr. Walsh on the link "cost saving talks.." is a very professional and mature image.

A picture of the CEO with his eyes colored in red, presumably a reference to his being Satan?

Heading a document about negotiations that you wish people to take seriously?

Sad. Just so very sad.
So, if BASSA and WW strike a deal does that mean a pact with the Devil?
PaddyMiguel is offline  
Old 4th Mar 2010, 15:04
  #1868 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Reading
Posts: 142
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
BASSA

other than having the standing of the Cabin Crew ridiculed across the country, and reduced passenger confidence in our employer, what have you actually achieved in the last year.

Nothing!
Andyismyname is offline  
Old 4th Mar 2010, 15:16
  #1869 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 1998
Location: Europe
Age: 53
Posts: 97
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Mr. Walsh claimed that 'internal disagreements have left us unable to maintain a common position'. This is a blatant LIE. We have been in constant session since January under the chairmanship of the TUC following the normal protocol of negotiations of this nature. We have made ourselves available at any time since then.
Would now be a good time to mention, again, that the deadline for this particular negotiation was June 30th 2009?
spin_doctor is offline  
Old 4th Mar 2010, 15:21
  #1870 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: Blighty
Posts: 568
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
For the few of you that are in any doubt, there will be no last minute deal, the Unions are in a corner that they cant get out of, the exact corner that WW wanted them in but more importantly the corner that he was employed to put them in in the first place.

The only problem for the members is that your leaders Mr L McWhateverhisname et all underestimated WW stance...

I feel for you all as you were very badly led and severely misguided...
springbok449 is offline  
Old 4th Mar 2010, 16:52
  #1871 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: brighton
Posts: 136
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
next move

Springbok whats the next move from WW then in your opinion, or even BASSA and what time frame?Surely the strike threat can not be left to linger?
wascrew is offline  
Old 4th Mar 2010, 17:03
  #1872 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: on the golf course (Covid permitting)
Posts: 2,131
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
wascrew

In my opinion yesterdays move by WW firmly put the ball in the court of BASSA as far as the next move is concerned. They have a backstop of 15th March to announce IA, so there is no immediate rush for them to respond. Personally I'd expect something early next week (that is something more than the posturing all happy bunnies claptrap issued today). I expect nothing from BA until BASSA respond, after all he's said there will be no going back come hell or high water - what more is there for him to say. What is required of BASSA is the realisation that the game is up.
TopBunk is offline  
Old 4th Mar 2010, 17:24
  #1873 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Deep in the barrel
Posts: 13
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
What an exciting time to work at BA.

To finally get rid of the BASSA hardcore militants who think BA owe them a lifestyle as they cower beneath a blanket of hardcore industrial protectionism.

Hoping that WW stands firm and while the moderate crew members come in and break the strike, the militants are left out in the cold fumbling with the wording of the terms and conditions of the New Fleet which will be the next contract these militants end up working under.

Shame on BASSA leadership for distorting the representation of the majority of crew, sacrificing the needs of the masses for the selfish needs of those at the top. I hope they enjoy their next holiday in Maritius, oh no without staff travel better make that Margate!
Dr Stoke is offline  
Old 4th Mar 2010, 17:25
  #1874 (permalink)  
cheerful pessimist
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Fenland
Posts: 70
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Will Unite appeal the February court judgement?

Is there a cut-off date that any appeal has to be lodged by?
eticket is offline  
Old 4th Mar 2010, 17:26
  #1875 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Catalunya
Posts: 58
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I have just flown two sectors with BA across the Atlantic, and I have this to say; that I have never flown with such professional and considerate cabin crew. Yes, many of them had their sell by date in roman numerals, but boy oh boy did they know their job, and did it very well. You will never get such service from someone 'trained' to do the job. You train dogs, not humans.
What BA senior management have done wrong in this dispute is to attempt to demonise all cabin crew, including those that do an excellent job; as with all things in life this will rebound. That has been a very wrong thing to do.
It has been an utter disgrace to publish crews allowances in the red top press, and has blatantly shown how low the management of the company is prepared to sink.
BA management will win this dispute, of that I have no doubt. But, I do wonder what worth they will be afterwards; who will trust them?
Things have a nasty and inevitable habit of coming around and going around, and this will happen, absolutely and for dead sure.
sussex2 is offline  
Old 4th Mar 2010, 17:37
  #1876 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Hants
Posts: 2,295
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
It has been an utter disgrace to publish crews allowances in the red top press
Why?

It was BASSA themselves (and some CC via various interviews/YouTube videos etc) who claimed that CC only earned £12-£14k. They neglected to mention that this was a basic wage and that you get allowances on top.

Being economical with the truth will always come back and bite you especially when, as in the case of BASSA, you are not clever enough to pull the wool over peoples eyes.

If BASSA want to try to make mileage out of factually incorrect claims, they have to accept that it is wholly apporpriate for the truth to be told.

Your beef should be with your useless union leadership... have you not worked this out yet?
anotherthing is offline  
Old 4th Mar 2010, 17:37
  #1877 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: London
Posts: 166
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
They may have had their sell by date in roman numerals, but remember BA hire the old as well as the young, and those crew were 'trained' to do the job too, possibly quite recently.
Timothy Claypole is offline  
Old 4th Mar 2010, 17:47
  #1878 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 1999
Location: UK
Posts: 145
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by sussex2
I have just flown two sectors with BA across the Atlantic, and I have this to say; that I have never flown with such professional and considerate cabin crew. You will never get such service from someone 'trained' to do the job. You train dogs, not humans.
No-one who regularly posts here suggests that BA cabin crew aren't professional and considerate.
And of course they were trained in their role. Any volunteers will be equally professional and considerate, if not quite so slick in the first couple of trips.

Originally Posted by sussex2
BA senior management have done wrong in this dispute is to attempt to demonise all cabin crew,
Please quote where they have done that.

Originally Posted by sussex2
It has been an utter disgrace to publish crews allowances in the red top press, and has blatantly shown how low the management of the company is prepared to sink.
The 'leaked' pay scales are, for a start, in the public domain (see CAA website), and demonstrated BA's legitimate need to reduce cabin crew costs when compared to our competitors. That's not sinking low, that's stating your case.
Originally Posted by sussex2
BA management will win this dispute, of that I have no doubt.
Glad you agree, so what's the point in destroying your union by going on strike then?

Originally Posted by sussex2
, I do wonder what worth they will be afterwards; who will trust them?
Things have a nasty and inevitable habit of coming around and going around, and this will happen, absolutely and for dead sure.
What's that supposed to mean? What would possibly concern BA on an industrial basis after winning this?

Or are you simply relying on 'Fate'?
Classic is offline  
Old 4th Mar 2010, 17:47
  #1879 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: UK
Posts: 103
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Hi Sussex 2,

I'm delighted you had such a positive experience with BA - people are always eager to find fault, but not so quick to give praise where it's due.

I would dispute your premise that BA have demonized crew. At no time have I heard anything other than praise for crew from the company. The problem IMHO is BASSA demonizing BA, to the point that they are truly considered demons by crew.

I think the real devils in all of this are BASSA themselves. They have spouted poison for years and years, and created the stupid situation we all fins ourselves in now.

Hopefully within a few short weeks, this will all be over, and nobody will have cause to put the great service BA and it's employees offer in the context of industrial unrest.
BlueUpGood is offline  
Old 4th Mar 2010, 17:51
  #1880 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: UK
Posts: 219
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
You will never get such service from someone 'trained' to do the job.
Like those at Singapore, Emirates, Virgin, Qatar? I think you'll find that their service standards tend to compare favourably with those of BA. BA are a good airline, but the idea that BA crew are of a higher standard than anyone else just doesn't coincide with customer surveys. If BA were repeatedly head and shoulders above everyone else, this argument would work. But sadly, it just isn't so. I really do wish it was.
Papillon is offline  

Thread Tools
Search this Thread

Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.