Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Other Aircrew Forums > Cabin Crew
Reload this Page >

British Airways - CC Industrial Relations & Negotiations

Cabin Crew Where professional flight attendants discuss matters that affect our jobs & lives.

British Airways - CC Industrial Relations & Negotiations

Old 26th Oct 2009, 21:30
  #2221 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Nice
Age: 74
Posts: 108
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
They cannot stop a ballot before it starts and will have to wait to see what the outcome is.
Jean-Lill is offline  
Old 26th Oct 2009, 22:06
  #2222 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: London
Age: 66
Posts: 58
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
They can only go to court if they can find a legal reason to do so.

It is not an automatic right that an employer has when their employees union gives them notice of strike.

They have to wait until the results of the ballot are known before they can do anything because it is not a foregone conclusion what the result will be.

Last edited by KitKat747; 26th Oct 2009 at 22:09. Reason: Missed something out
KitKat747 is offline  
Old 26th Oct 2009, 22:12
  #2223 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 1999
Location: UK
Posts: 1,691
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I'd imagine the pages upon pages of lies and half-truths BASSA has published throughout the negotiations might have caught the eye of BA's lawyers. If the union was misleading it's members about things it might make a strike ballot somewhat shakey.
Carnage Matey! is offline  
Old 26th Oct 2009, 22:53
  #2224 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: brighton
Posts: 31
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
sorry for being dense but it's just occurred to me... who will pilot the new fleet in the grand scheme of things? will it be a similar situation as to who will crew it? just thinking of the whole open skies thing, which as we all now see was an, er-error!
saintjoseph is offline  
Old 26th Oct 2009, 22:57
  #2225 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: House
Posts: 0
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Rather think you could be a BA pilot worried about your big fat pension or a management spy take note I'm closer to the facts than you think know what has taken place along the dirty road BA has led us along time for action not running like Balpa did for your boys. I'm not on the £60,000 touted in the press and never will be but will still fight for a fair wage something that you'll be unaware of. If we trusted BA we would all be begging for the minimal wage but that went back in Victorian times Bassa have good people and together we will fight to the end. Off to bed now some of us have to work tomorrow.
Watersidewonker is offline  
Old 26th Oct 2009, 23:03
  #2226 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: 35,000 ft
Posts: 468
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
WWW - if Cabin Crew strike, we probably will end up working for peanuts.

At the moment, we have a very good offer that does NOT REDUCE OUR SALARY BY ONE PENNY. How is that "working for peanuts"?

The only worry that we have now is New Fleet - but WW has written to Unite to meet their request to talk about new contracts for new crew. Why have they refused this and instead issued a ballot? Unite should be talking to WW and negotiating this in OUR best interests. WHY ARE THEY NOT DOING THIS.?

A very good offer is about to turn very sour due to people who are unable to read the EVIDENCE and blindly accept the utter tripe that BASSA are saying.

I remember in 2007 people virtually in tears the day before the strike was due, as they didn't expect to actually have to carry it out. I think this time WW is going to call their bluff.

W2P - many of us are talking about the need for new representation, not only on here but online. It's amazing when you admit that you don't support the union, the relief that people show and they actually reveal that they don't either. What can we do? This is appalling. Unite haven't even had the decency to inform us of the ballot yet - I had to hear it on the news
HiFlyer14 is offline  
Old 26th Oct 2009, 23:09
  #2227 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: brighton
Posts: 31
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
not a pilot or a management spy! though clearly my spiel was good enough to be either! actually i'm lgw crew, genuinely wanting to know who ww thinks will pilot the new fleet. unless i've missed something somewhere on this mammoth thread, it looks like gap year students, senior crewed by lgw seniors who live in slough, and ..... in the flight deck?
nb. no offence to any stereotypes!
why would any lgw crew move to newfleet on less t&c's unless it was for geographical reasons? so is it all to be made up from temps in the holding pool! and if so, what's to stop the same practice re pilots in the future? newsnight winding down, bedtime!
saintjoseph is offline  
Old 26th Oct 2009, 23:10
  #2228 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Sussex,UK
Posts: 469
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I suspect this will end up in court. And I suspect that any sane judge will take one look at the rather less than professional way that BASSA has conducted itself during these negotiations and side with BA all the way. BA will have been very careful during all this. Every move they have made will, undoubtedly, have been checked and counter checked by the company lawyers. I would even go so far as to say that they knew a ballot was inevitable from the outset and that this is the moment they have been waiting for. Underestimate them at your peril.
jetset lady is offline  
Old 26th Oct 2009, 23:30
  #2229 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: brighton
Posts: 31
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
jetset lady exactly what i've heard. shorthaul will be cancelled, and lgw crews will be bussed up to operate 777 lh out of lhr, working to lhr renumerations. and no one is going to turn down lhr wages/routes on a jolly. there's no loyalty when your monthly allowances are gonna jump a few hundred quid. which is why bassa should've seen what was happenning with gatwick way back! though to reiterate, who will be piloting the aircraft?
saintjoseph is offline  
Old 26th Oct 2009, 23:41
  #2230 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Nice
Age: 74
Posts: 108
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
With reference to possible court involvement in connection with industrial strike action.


The only thing that matters is what is written on the piece of paper that is in the envelope with the ballot paper.
Jean-Lill is offline  
Old 27th Oct 2009, 00:04
  #2231 (permalink)  

PPRuNe Person
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: see roster
Posts: 1,268
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
who will be piloting the aircraft?
What kind of a question is that?
overstress is offline  
Old 27th Oct 2009, 00:11
  #2232 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: London
Posts: 276
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The only thing that matters is what is written on the piece of paper that is in the envelope with the ballot paper.
I'm sure with BASSA's writing skills it will go straight to court.
nuigini is offline  
Old 27th Oct 2009, 00:15
  #2233 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: London
Posts: 276
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
who will be piloting the aircraft?
Of course WW and BF with their secretaries.

The pilots of course... is it a rhetorical question?
nuigini is offline  
Old 27th Oct 2009, 02:22
  #2234 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: LGW
Posts: 595
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Saintjoseph,

Due to the SCOPE agreement (mentioned a few pages ago), the aircraft will be manned by BA pilots. Not "new fleet pilots".

Thanks to the rest of you for answering my question about the courts. Reading my question again, it's blatantly obvious that we have to wait for the ballot results before any court action. I was having a blond-ish moment...

I agree with Highflyer's last post. No news from unions about the ballot. Refusal to negotiate and spewing out numerous lies. Not exactly responsible behaviour in anyone's eyes, if only more people could open theirs.

Right, back to the brandy....

Gg
Glamgirl is offline  
Old 27th Oct 2009, 04:41
  #2235 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: worthing
Age: 57
Posts: 11
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I've been lurking here for, well a while now and finally decided to sign up.

Whilst I do not take the sycophantic approach of Glamgirl, I will not be supporting a strike either. I'm not a huge fan of WW but I do think it's a mistake to underestimate him as so many seem to. I think the time for a change of contracts and Ts&Cs is long overdue and the deal offered isn't a bad one at all.

I am however disappointed that so many take the "I'm alright Jack" approach and are all for solidarity yet think nothing of crew coming in on lesser terms and conditions.

On a personal level I'm getting sick and tired of pilot bashing. They're pilots, they get paid more than us. Get over it. In the same vein I'm also a little tired of the pilots constant bashing of cabin crew. I think when the dust has settled we'll see a more streamlined and cost effective BA with more industy standard terms and conditions for both flightdeck and cabin crew.
oldbird is offline  
Old 27th Oct 2009, 06:48
  #2236 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: West Sussex
Posts: 4
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Daisy1

I agree with you Oldbird. I've flown for over 20years and seen this all before. The only losers will be US! BA have very very good lawyers in the City (I know I worked for a city lawfirm years ago). These guys will be on the case.
Daisy1 is offline  
Old 27th Oct 2009, 08:04
  #2237 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: sussex
Posts: 613
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From a passengers point of view, my concern is that i cannot see in 5 years BA offering the same standard of cabin service when the pay for new crew is less than the 'waste operatives' emptying my Bins and working at my local dump.
stormin norman is offline  
Old 27th Oct 2009, 08:14
  #2238 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: worthing
Age: 57
Posts: 11
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Stormin I'm going to disagree with you on that. If you employ the right people, train them the right way, provide them with the right product and get the right corporate culture there's no reason for a deterioration in service.

Turnover can be a good thing. It keeps labour costs low, keeps fresh blood coming in who are usually more enthusiatic and want to do the job because they want to do it and not because they make too much £ to even think about leaving when they're past their "best before" date.
oldbird is offline  
Old 27th Oct 2009, 08:39
  #2239 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Hants
Posts: 21
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Rather see the company fail than work for peanuts.
Do you mind moving over and letting someone else do the job then? I imagine there are plenty of applicants at the moment. I don't think it's your right to determine the future of the company unless you happen to be a majority shareholder.
PeetD is offline  
Old 27th Oct 2009, 08:47
  #2240 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: London
Posts: 207
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From a passengers point of view, my concern is that i cannot see in 5 years BA offering the same standard of cabin service when the pay for new crew is less than the 'waste operatives' emptying my Bins and working at my local dump.
This would be a concern if service from LGW was significantly worse than from LHR. It's not because it isn't. In fact, IME, service from LGW can be much better than from LHR for the reasons oldbird suggests.
Lord Bracken is offline  

Thread Tools
Search this Thread

Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.