Wikiposts
Search
Biz Jets, Ag Flying, GA etc. The place for discussion of issues related to corporate, Ag and GA aviation. If you're a professional pilot and don't fly for the airlines then try here.

supersonic no more

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 29th Nov 2015, 09:30
  #61 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2014
Location: Montenegro
Age: 41
Posts: 339
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
ah right
AreOut is offline  
Old 29th Nov 2015, 09:38
  #62 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: schermoney and left front seat
Age: 57
Posts: 2,438
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
For all business jet owners, the money is not a problem, simply because it's the most expensive and inefficient way of traveling

"My" businessjet is owned by a corporation and "they" (the board) consider it very efficient. We do things you simply can´t with airlines in a certain time frame. We go places where no airline flies to. And our our homebase has 2 daily connections to the capital and thats it.

They consider it also as expensive.
His dudeness is offline  
Old 29th Nov 2015, 10:45
  #63 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Japan
Posts: 1,955
Received 144 Likes on 87 Posts
Just been watching the tail-end of a Japanese TV programme explaining the most recent results of tests they did on their joint JAXA/Swedish supersonic plane.
The Japanese Space Agency Tested a Supersonic Plane With Less Sonic Boom | Motherboard


Their main discovery was the sonic boom created by the aircraft's profile is roughly 1/4 that of Concorde.


To get the public to understand this concept, they said, imagine the clap of thunder that accompanies a very close flash of lightning. That would be the Concorde sonic boom. Then imagine the same flash of lightning some distance away and the resultant rumble of thunder, approximating the relative sound from JAXA's test frame.


Some footage of their testing concepts here, but no sound?
http://www.bing.com/videos/search?q=...9879D939AD2767

Last edited by jolihokistix; 29th Nov 2015 at 10:58.
jolihokistix is offline  
Old 29th Nov 2015, 11:11
  #64 (permalink)  
Resident insomniac
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: N54 58 34 W02 01 21
Age: 79
Posts: 1,873
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Their main discovery was the sonic boom created by the aircraft's profile is roughly 1/4 that of Concorde.
But, isn't their test vehicle much, much, smaller?
G-CPTN is offline  
Old 29th Nov 2015, 11:20
  #65 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Japan
Posts: 1,955
Received 144 Likes on 87 Posts
For the equivalent size, perhaps?
jolihokistix is offline  
Old 29th Nov 2015, 16:58
  #66 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Aberdeen
Posts: 56
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Since this is made by Airbus and not an American company, you can expect a repeat of Concorde and Boeing et al to prevent its entry to America.
Quartz-1 is offline  
Old 29th Nov 2015, 17:47
  #67 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Sep 2014
Location: Canada
Posts: 1,257
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Aerion is an American company, led by a Texas billionaire, and based in Reno, Nevada. The AS2 final assembly will be in a new US manufacturing facility (location to be announced next year).

Airbus is collaborating via its US-based subsidiary, Airbus Group Inc., headquartered in McNair, Virginia.
peekay4 is offline  
Old 29th Nov 2015, 17:58
  #68 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: California
Posts: 14
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Since this is made by Airbus and not an American company, you can expect a repeat of Concorde and Boeing et al to prevent its entry to America.
That's right, blame the lack of sales to conspiracy by it's intended customers. Not on it's most obvious commercial faults.

This is what most people around the world don't want to hear first thing in the morning:


PS: Once this thing starts waking up those nice people in Orange County, California, this plane can forget about using John Wayne Airport.
DH_call is offline  
Old 29th Nov 2015, 18:05
  #69 (permalink)  

Aviator Extraordinaire
 
Join Date: May 2000
Location: Oklahoma City, Oklahoma USA
Age: 76
Posts: 2,394
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Since this is made by Airbus and not an American company, you can expect a repeat of Concorde and Boeing et al to prevent its entry to America.
A repeat of exactly what?

The Concorde was never prevented entry into the United States.
con-pilot is offline  
Old 30th Nov 2015, 13:28
  #70 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: New Braunfels, TX
Age: 70
Posts: 1,954
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Since this is made by Airbus and not an American company....
And now crass parochialism raises its ugly head.

you can expect a repeat of Concorde and Boeing et al to prevent its entry to America.
Wait, what? Concorde was prevented entry into America? New York, New Jersey, Washington, Las Vegas, Lexington, Atlanta, Oshkosh, Pittsburgh, Dallas, Las Vegas, Honolulu, Colorado Springs, Waco, Miami, Seattle, Oakland, Boston, Fort Worth, etc etc etc are not in America? Who knew?
KenV is offline  
Old 30th Nov 2015, 13:53
  #71 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: KUL
Posts: 431
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Well - it was banned for a couple of years

Why Was Concorde Not Allowed In The US? — Civil Aviation Forum | Airliners.net
MrMachfivepointfive is offline  
Old 30th Nov 2015, 15:50
  #72 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: Everett, WA
Age: 68
Posts: 4,407
Received 180 Likes on 88 Posts
Except that post is wrong - Concorde service to Dulles started in May 1976, only a few months after Concorde entered commercial service. It was banned from JFK for a couple years (primarily due to noise concerns), but not from the US.
And the opposition to Concorde had nothing to do with Boeing - it was pretty much the same environmentalists that helped kill the Boeing 2707 that were against it serving JFK.
tdracer is online now  
Old 30th Nov 2015, 15:58
  #73 (permalink)  
AR1
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Nottinghamshire
Age: 63
Posts: 710
Received 4 Likes on 1 Post
This is what most people around the world don't want to hear first thing in the morning:
And most wont
AR1 is offline  
Old 22nd May 2021, 14:35
  #74 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: the hills of halton
Age: 71
Posts: 809
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
supersonic no more

https://www.cnbc.com/2021/05/21/aeri...ness-jets.html

widgeon is offline  
Old 22nd May 2021, 21:12
  #75 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Canada/Malaysia
Age: 83
Posts: 272
Received 18 Likes on 12 Posts
...poof...
https://www.theverge.com/2021/5/22/2...ial-air-travel

BlankBox is online now  
Old 23rd May 2021, 22:47
  #76 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2016
Location: UK
Posts: 132
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I'm shocked I tell you, shocked.

Right Hand Thread is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.