Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Aircrew Forums > Biz Jets, Ag Flying, GA etc.
Reload this Page >

Great news for the Global 7500...

Wikiposts
Search
Biz Jets, Ag Flying, GA etc. The place for discussion of issues related to corporate, Ag and GA aviation. If you're a professional pilot and don't fly for the airlines then try here.

Great news for the Global 7500...

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 4th Mar 2019, 20:46
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: CYUL
Posts: 880
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Great news for the Global 7500...

Global 7500 Sets Bizjet Range Record...

Bombardier’s new Global 7500 this week achieved what the manufacturer is billing as the world’s longest flight by a purpose-built business jet. The aircraft logged 8,152 nm after taking off from Singapore at 7:12 a.m. local time on March 4 and landing in Tucson, Arizona, at 8:19 a.m.—setting a speed record for this sector in the process.

The aircraft landed with 4,300 pounds of fuel, falling well within NBAA requirements with nearly 90 additional minutes of flight time possible.

The Global 7500 entered service on December 20, 2018. Designed for long intercontinental flights, it boasts the industry’s largest business jet cabin and a maximum speed of Mach 0.925. This week’s flight exceeded the aircraft’s advertised range of 7,700 nm.

“The Global 7500 was built to break all the records,” commented Bombardier Business Aircraft president David Coleal. “It achieved the industry’s longest mission ever in business aviation after only two months in service. We’ve demonstrated its unequaled long-range and high-speed capabilities, but also its ability to break records confidently with healthy fuel reserves remaining, once again, confirming its unsurpassed performance to customers.”

Jet Jockey A4 is offline  
Old 5th Mar 2019, 19:24
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Only upon request
Posts: 871
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Curious to know about the other details.

My estimates:
16h07 flight with 506 KT average ground speed. Suppose a 20 KT tail wind that could have been achieved with M.84/85 cruise.

FLEXJET is offline  
Old 5th Mar 2019, 21:18
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: World
Posts: 2,563
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
How’s that a good news?

I can’t imagine any pilot happy to spend that much time in a pressurized aluminium tube.
dirk85 is offline  
Old 7th Mar 2019, 07:27
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2017
Location: europe
Posts: 156
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by dirk85
How’s that a good news?

I can’t imagine any pilot happy to spend that much time in a pressurized aluminium tube.
Well, first he said good news for the aircraft, not the pilot.

Then, fly 15 hours, spend 10 days on a beach, fly back...

And you can always chose a job on a smaller aircraft, Citation or other, and fly 2 hours 6 times a day ;-)
arketip is offline  
Old 7th Mar 2019, 08:25
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: The wrong time zone...
Posts: 843
Received 58 Likes on 23 Posts
Originally Posted by Humpmedumpme
As long as you can still sleep on the floor next to the toilet instead of the non, lie flat crewrest seat all will be good
My understanding is the crew-rest seat is much improved - proper lie flat!
josephfeatherweight is offline  
Old 26th Jun 2022, 03:06
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: England
Posts: 4
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Humpmedumpme
As long as you can still sleep on the floor next to the toilet instead of the non, lie flat crewrest seat all will be good
You clearly haven't been near one have you?
Birdlover is offline  
Old 20th Mar 2023, 14:57
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: England
Posts: 4
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Angel we speak of things we know not of!

Originally Posted by Humpmedumpme
Not sure how you can jump to that conclusion. But I can infer that your understanding of sarcasm is limited and the fact that the 7500 is a stretch version of the 6000 with its less than crew friendly rest arrangement is well documented, hence the sarcastic comment 🤦🤦🤦

You have also no doubt seen all the possible layouts of the galley in the 7500, in your infinite knowledge, and think that a bench seat with 5 crew on a 16 hour flight is a great idea.
Interesting since I spent 8 years of my life designing the very elements you speak of! you speak with forked tongue and no experience my friend. please forgive me if I call you a FOUR LETTER WORD beginning with C and ending with Tee - and the four letter word is of course, Cute
Birdlover is offline  
Old 20th Mar 2023, 17:20
  #8 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2014
Location: Europe
Age: 33
Posts: 141
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I'm honestly interested in learning how the crew rest facilities of a long-range bizjet are. Could you elaborate? Some photos maybe?
Central Scrutinizer is offline  
Old 20th Mar 2023, 18:39
  #9 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Germany
Posts: 702
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
For starters you can search the internet for photos like "Global 6000 crew rest", you'll find a bunch of photos.
EatMyShorts! is offline  
Old 21st Mar 2023, 02:25
  #10 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: .
Posts: 190
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I've know of several operators of the 6000 and 7500 that opted for the standard crew rest seat that fully reclines flat with a bunk above it so 2 crew can lie flat, or 1 can sit while the top lies flat. I've also seen the first 2 club seats on a 7500 sectioned off for crew rest.

When 2 fa's and 3 pilots are onboard a 7500 I would imagine those with only 1 lie flat crew rest seat must also occupy a cabin seat for rest?

I find the VJ config very strange unless galley divan turns into a bed.


Standard:

falcon10 is offline  
Old 21st Mar 2023, 19:23
  #11 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Canada
Posts: 1,746
Received 151 Likes on 75 Posts
https://robbreport.com/motors/aviati...ip-1234681116/

“ Martel said during the press conference that current Global 7500 owners would be able to “retrofit” their aircraft to obtain the same speed and range as the Global 8000. The 7500 would also be phased out when the 8000, which has a base price of $78 million, enters service in 2025.”

I wonder how much the “Retrofit” for the 7500 will cost? I bet it will not be cheap.
Except for the small added range and “Bragging Rights” about the speed, of Mach .94 up from Mach .925 probably not worth the price.
8000
  • Top speed0.94
  • Ultra-high speed cruise0.92
  • High-speed cruise0.90
  • Typical cruise speed0.85

7500
  • Top speed0.925
  • High-speed cruise0.90
  • Typical cruise speed0.85
albatross is offline  
Old 21st Mar 2023, 19:37
  #12 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Geneva, Switzerland
Age: 58
Posts: 1,907
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
May 22 ?

More seriously can't seem to find the range at M 0.94 ?
atakacs is offline  
Old 22nd Mar 2023, 05:09
  #13 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: The wrong time zone...
Posts: 843
Received 58 Likes on 23 Posts
Originally Posted by albatross
https://robbreport.com/motors/aviati...ip-1234681116/

“ Martel said during the press conference that current Global 7500 owners would be able to “retrofit” their aircraft to obtain the same speed and range as the Global 8000. The 7500 would also be phased out when the 8000, which has a base price of $78 million, enters service in 2025.”

I wonder how much the “Retrofit” for the 7500 will cost? I bet it will not be cheap.
Except for the small added range and “Bragging Rights” about the speed, of Mach .94 up from Mach .925 probably not worth the price.
8000
  • Top speed0.94
  • Ultra-high speed cruise0.92
  • High-speed cruise0.90
  • Typical cruise speed0.85

7500
  • Top speed0.925
  • High-speed cruise0.90
  • Typical cruise speed0.85
You are not wrong about the "bragging rights", however the other factor will be ease of resale.
The typical cruise speed of the 7500 (from the operators I know) is 0.88.
0.85 is (pretty much) equivalent to LRC

Last edited by josephfeatherweight; 22nd Mar 2023 at 07:56.
josephfeatherweight is offline  
Old 22nd Mar 2023, 09:00
  #14 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2014
Location: Europe
Age: 33
Posts: 141
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by atakacs
May 22 ?

More seriously can't seem to find the range at M 0.94 ?
Maybe not M 0.94 but these might give an idea:
  • 7,700 n miles (14,260 km; 8,861 miles) (est) (NBAA reserves, at M0.85, with four crew and eight passengers, Global 7500)
  • 7,900 n miles (14,630 km; 9,091 miles) (est) (NBAA reserves, at M0.85, with four crew and eight passengers, Global 8000)
  • 5,650 n miles (10,463 km; 6,501 miles) (est) (NBAA reserves, at M0.90, with four crew and eight passengers, Global 8000)
Central Scrutinizer is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.