Biz Jets, Ag Flying, GA etc. The place for discussion of issues related to corporate, Ag and GA aviation. If you're a professional pilot and don't fly for the airlines then try here.

Viability of G3 vs G4

Old 13th Aug 2018, 03:48
  #81 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: KSAN
Posts: 39
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by rickseeman
I love Gulfstreams but they (or any large jet) are maintenance hogs. It's a lot worse than you can imagine. One of the posters above put down $10,000 per year for the hangar. He must not be the one paying for hangar space. I pay hangar space and I say the cost would be at least 10 times that. Truthfully large cabin aircraft need their own hangar because the mechanic will be doing small inspections on a constant basis.The CMP on a large aircraft is nearly 400 pages if that gives you an idea how much there is to do. You are in the same situation my brother was in. Wondering if this large cabin jet thing is a good idea. In time you might end up with a Gulfstream but why not get your feet wet with a mid-size first. As you operate it you will learn about maintenance, hangars and mechanics. If you like how it goes you might buy yourself a Gulfstream size hangar, build a relationship with a part time mechanic on the field and get yourself in position. Now you are ready. For now Lear 55's are nearly free (I only recommend the 55 instead of the 60 because they are cheaper and there are a zillion Lear pilots around, Lear 60 is a different type rating) the maintenance is cheap (relatively speaking) and they are beautiful. Last year the most perfect 55C imaginable was for sale asking $895,000.

I pay for the hangar space. I put 10k down as a EXTREMELY conservative number based on your post stating how the "po boys" do it.
I assumed after that post/statement a hangar might not even be part of your budget or mindset. But thanks for proving me right and adding another 100k to your GIII fling bringing it to 24k a hour to operate. It also sounds like your tone is changing overall and aligning with what everyone stated from the start......ironic.
gbruton is offline  
Old 13th Aug 2018, 14:52
  #82 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2017
Location: Stuttgart, AR
Posts: 35
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by gbruton
I pay for the hangar space. I put 10k down as a EXTREMELY conservative number based on your post stating how the "po boys" do it.
I assumed after that post/statement a hangar might not even be part of your budget or mindset. But thanks for proving me right and adding another 100k to your GIII fling bringing it to 24k a hour to operate. It also sounds like your tone is changing overall and aligning with what everyone stated from the start......ironic.
All the numbers I posted were real. A hangar in California won't be cheap. We flew the GIII 40 hours. You said it cost us 24K an hour to operate, $960,000. No it didn't.
rickseeman is offline  
Old 13th Aug 2018, 17:01
  #83 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: schermoney and left front seat
Age: 57
Posts: 2,437
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by rickseeman
We flew the GIII 40 hours.
And you had only a nav light go broke, thus basically no mx cost. I´m so impressed...
His dudeness is offline  
Old 14th Aug 2018, 09:52
  #84 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Ormond Beach
Age: 48
Posts: 12
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by flyboyike
If my calculations are correct, that thing will run about $70,000 PER FILLUP. That's at US airline fuel rates, so probably more internationally and still more at bizjet rates. That's just the gas.

I understand the airplane was just purchased by a "leasing company". I hope they didn't buy it just to strip and scrap, but the fact that even the Qatari royals didn't want to run it anymore is not a good sign.
Bit of an update. It appears said "leasing company" has put VP-BAT back up for sale. It's on controller.com now at a much lower price than what the Qataris were reportedly asking for it. Supposedly the new buyer will get a fresh C check and new paint.
flyboyike is offline  
Old 14th Aug 2018, 14:18
  #85 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: KSAN
Posts: 39
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by rickseeman
All the numbers I posted were real. A hangar in California won't be cheap. We flew the GIII 40 hours. You said it cost us 24K an hour to operate, $960,000. No it didn't.
I said/guessed 24k a hour based off the limited information you have provided(which changes daily with you) and by providing a conservative number which you disagreed with only to say it was too low by $90,000. You first stated all the flights you did on the plane which would equal 20 - 26hrs of flight time. You now just stated you did nearly double that at 40hrs. Which is fine.

Numbers I used that where in my first post -
Jet 400k
Crew 250k
Fuel 50k --------- > goes up because we where using 20 hours and you said 40hrs 100k (still low fyi)
Fees/crew hotel 5k --------------> This number should increase but we will assume they where day trips.
hangar 10k -----------------------> which you say was wrong and was 100k
Need to add insurance so another 50k.
Total on "basic" cost with the Jet purchase removed because you said yo sold it for what you bought it for 400k is $505,000 divided by 40 hours = $12,625 a hour to operate. (charter brand new at that cost with no headaches)
So based off this very limited information. Yes, you where able to operate a GIII for around 500k.... but at a extremely high hourly cost and high risk of a major cost coming down the line.
If that is what you are into and you understand the risk do it. It is your money.
I do not think anyone on the forum would argue with anyone who came on here saying I know/understand the risk/cost to buy a old aircraft but I really want to do it because I like old spey engines or some bs but I'm willing to spend the money.

The issue is when someone comes on asking how they can bend the rules/cost to justify a old aircraft purchase to work like it is a new aircraft.
gbruton is offline  
Old 15th Aug 2018, 15:47
  #86 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jul 2018
Location: San Juan Capistrano
Posts: 42
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
What do you all think of a Lear 55 as a less expensive US only alternative? I say less expensive as opposed to a GIV, naturally. Opinions? Please don't flame, give me opinions.
Catorce14 is offline  
Old 15th Aug 2018, 18:38
  #87 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2013
Location: South Alabama
Age: 74
Posts: 339
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Info

Originally Posted by Catorce14
What do you all think of a Lear 55 as a less expensive US only alternative? I say less expensive as opposed to a GIV, naturally. Opinions? Please don't flame, give me opinions.
In your original posts, you mentioned a purchase price of $2-3 million and an annual operations budget of $500K. Your research has shown you can purchase a lot of airplane in your buy range.

Your limiting factor is your annual proposed expenditure. Rickseeman was very fortunate in his purchases and operations, but if he had held and operated to planes for an annual+ period of time, his picture would be quite a bit different.

In very round calculations, corporate operators “generally” have budgets of about 60% fixed costs and 40% direct operating costs. The NBAA has some very good budget worksheets you may be able to obtain. Conklin & de Decker are well known for producing apples to apples comparisons for a good starting place. Based on these percentages, you would have about $300K for pilots, insurance, hangarage, etc, and $200K for fuel, maintenance catering, landing, parking, etc.

Therefore, what you really need is a plane with a relatively known DOC of roughly $1,300 to $2,000 per hour (150 or 100 hours per year)

Not recommending a specific type or direction you should take, but from experience, can tell you it will not be a Gulfstream or equivalent. For your 1 trip to Italy annually, go business/first. Hope this helps.
Old Boeing Driver is offline  
Old 15th Aug 2018, 19:37
  #88 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jul 2018
Location: San Juan Capistrano
Posts: 42
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Old Boeing Driver
In your original posts, you mentioned a purchase price of $2-3 million and an annual operations budget of $500K. Your research has shown you can purchase a lot of airplane in your buy range.

Your limiting factor is your annual proposed expenditure. Rickseeman was very fortunate in his purchases and operations, but if he had held and operated to planes for an annual+ period of time, his picture would be quite a bit different.

In very round calculations, corporate operators “generally” have budgets of about 60% fixed costs and 40% direct operating costs. The NBAA has some very good budget worksheets you may be able to obtain. Conklin & de Decker are well known for producing apples to apples comparisons for a good starting place. Based on these percentages, you would have about $300K for pilots, insurance, hangarage, etc, and $200K for fuel, maintenance catering, landing, parking, etc.

Therefore, what you really need is a plane with a relatively known DOC of roughly $1,300 to $2,000 per hour (150 or 100 hours per year)

Not recommending a specific type or direction you should take, but from experience, can tell you it will not be a Gulfstream or equivalent. For your 1 trip to Italy annually, go business/first. Hope this helps.
Yep, I have arrived at the same conclusion. I have also talked to Spectra Jet which services Lear and heard some good things about the 55 from a maintenance standpoint. The question is whether this plain is suitable for my domestic only operations.
Catorce14 is offline  
Old 15th Aug 2018, 20:52
  #89 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2013
Location: South Alabama
Age: 74
Posts: 339
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
One other thing

Originally Posted by Catorce14
Yep, I have arrived at the same conclusion. I have also talked to Spectra Jet which services Lear and heard some good things about the 55 from a maintenance standpoint. The question is whether this plain is suitable for my domestic only operations.
$500K per year will buy you quite a bit of charter time on some nice jets and/or turboprops (for your short haul trips)

There are a lot of reputable operators in your area of the country. Their safety records and training can easily be reviewed. Also references.

You would not risk purchase money, or have the "headaches" of ownership.

One thing that was mentioned earlier is what kind of pilot/s will you find in your price range, and how do you keep his/her skills up at even 150 HPY. Forget about 135. It will cost you more than you make.

All this just opinions, but from experience.
Old Boeing Driver is offline  
Old 15th Aug 2018, 21:50
  #90 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jul 2018
Location: San Juan Capistrano
Posts: 42
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
For the short and infrequent trips I would make, it seems like contract pilots would be the way to go. One one directory, for the Lear 55 for example, there are literally pages and pages of them with their day rates posted. I'd probably build up a stable of trusted ones and use them as required. I really don't see the point of annually hiring a pilot and copilot - it would probably be a very unrewarding gig for them based upon my frequency of travel.

And it's not like I have to leave "this minute". I would gave days, even weeks of notice. My life is just not that rapidly evolving that I need to have a pilot in the cockpit keeping the engines warm.
Catorce14 is offline  
Old 16th Aug 2018, 00:46
  #91 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Ormond Beach
Age: 48
Posts: 12
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Catorce14
And it's not like I have to leave "this minute". I would gave days, even weeks of notice. My life is just not that rapidly evolving that I need to have a pilot in the cockpit keeping the engines warm.
Originally Posted by catorce14
I also want to go when I want to go, and to wherever.
Which is it?
flyboyike is offline  
Old 16th Aug 2018, 01:19
  #92 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2013
Location: South Alabama
Age: 74
Posts: 339
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Well now....

Originally Posted by Catorce14
For the short and infrequent trips I would make, it seems like contract pilots would be the way to go. One one directory, for the Lear 55 for example, there are literally pages and pages of them with their day rates posted. I'd probably build up a stable of trusted ones and use them as required. I really don't see the point of annually hiring a pilot and copilot - it would probably be a very unrewarding gig for them based upon my frequency of travel.

And it's not like I have to leave "this minute". I would gave days, even weeks of notice. My life is just not that rapidly evolving that I need to have a pilot in the cockpit keeping the engines warm.
You are really opening up a can of worms now.

How would you determine which pilots to trust with your life and your family's lives. Do you have the knowledge to know which one to pick?

I realize it would be a similar situation as chartering, but a company that employs, trains, and evaluates its pilots on a regular basis is far more likely to have quality pilots.

Not saying there aren't some quality contract guys out there.

The quality guys are usually high in demand and hard to get even with several days or weeks notice.

For a really good outfit in SOCAL, look at Clay Lacy as an example. Maybe do a sample charter with them, or some other reputable company there.

If you think that owning and operating a plane on your own is really for you, then go for it.
Old Boeing Driver is offline  
Old 16th Aug 2018, 02:38
  #93 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jul 2018
Location: San Juan Capistrano
Posts: 42
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by flyboyike
Which is it?
I'm not seeing a difference. I want to go when I feel like it subject to pilot availability but also other factors as well, weather being one of them. Generally speaking I would never need to go anywhere on a moment's notice as in my 45 years I have never had to. So yeah, whenever I want within reason .
Catorce14 is offline  
Old 16th Aug 2018, 02:41
  #94 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jul 2018
Location: San Juan Capistrano
Posts: 42
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Old Boeing Driver
You are really opening up a can of worms now.

How would you determine which pilots to trust with your life and your family's lives. Do you have the knowledge to know which one to pick?

I realize it would be a similar situation as chartering, but a company that employs, trains, and evaluates its pilots on a regular basis is far more likely to have quality pilots.

Not saying there aren't some quality contract guys out there.

The quality guys are usually high in demand and hard to get even with several days or weeks notice.

For a really good outfit in SOCAL, look at Clay Lacy as an example. Maybe do a sample charter with them, or some other reputable company there.

If you think that owning and operating a plane on your own is really for you, then go for it.
Great minds think alike. I was going to say you don't get to pick your charter pilot, you certainly don't get to pick your airline pilot or train conductor .at least I can interview these people who are type rated for the plane I would buy and evaluate their risk tolerance and personality.

No different than in the military .you get handed a detachment or squad that aren't your people that you need to do an important mission with. At some point you need to trust their training and make it work.

Last edited by Catorce14; 16th Aug 2018 at 02:51.
Catorce14 is offline  
Old 16th Aug 2018, 02:58
  #95 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jul 2018
Location: San Juan Capistrano
Posts: 42
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Hit submit too soon.

On a commerical flight I could get either sullenberger or that germanwings pilot who flew everyone into the mountain because he was depressed. I did background investigations for my unit for a couple years; we would use them to determine who was fit to be armed. I became real good at looking at a guys references, driving record, interview, and general data to get a picture of what kind of person we were dealing with. I would use those same skills to evaluate a contract pilot.

​​​​​​
Catorce14 is offline  
Old 16th Aug 2018, 06:23
  #96 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2013
Location: Equatorial
Age: 51
Posts: 1,056
Received 115 Likes on 57 Posts
You certainly can pick your charter pilot if your using the same company on a semi regular basis.

You are the client, you can stipulate minimum pilot qualifications, you can request reference checks and you can meet pilots prior if you want. This is rare but acceptable.

If it’s not then pick another charter company.

Global Aviator is online now  
Old 16th Aug 2018, 14:12
  #97 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: California
Posts: 282
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Just to add... many years ago the FAA lumped several different a/c models into the same pilot type rating. Learjet got away with this early on. The Lear 55 type rating is the same rating as the much different Lear 20 series and Lear 30 series type ratings so you might find most guys claiming to be Lear 55 “rated” have never actually flown a Lear 55. Just a heads up.
ksjc is offline  
Old 16th Aug 2018, 15:01
  #98 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jul 2018
Location: San Juan Capistrano
Posts: 42
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by ksjc
Just to add... many years ago the FAA lumped several different a/c models into the same pilot type rating. Learjet got away with this early on. The Lear 55 type rating is the same rating as the much different Lear 20 series and Lear 30 series type ratings so you might find most guys claiming to be Lear 55 “rated” have never actually flown a Lear 55. Just a heads up.
Good Point. Here is what I am seeing. I have cropped out the guy's personal info, but here is one I thought was good as an example. You tell me.

Catorce14 is offline  
Old 16th Aug 2018, 19:06
  #99 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: schermoney and left front seat
Age: 57
Posts: 2,437
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Catorce14
Hit submit too soon.

On a commerical flight I could get either sullenberger or that germanwings pilot who flew everyone into the mountain because he was depressed. I did background investigations for my unit for a couple years; we would use them to determine who was fit to be armed. I became real good at looking at a guys references, driving record, interview, and general data to get a picture of what kind of person we were dealing with. I would use those same skills to evaluate a contract pilot.

​​​​​​
You do realize, that Lubitz (that Germanwings-Killer), was evaluated several times by psychologists ? Just sayin.
His dudeness is offline  
Old 16th Aug 2018, 19:28
  #100 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2013
Location: South Alabama
Age: 74
Posts: 339
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
How?

Originally Posted by Catorce14
Hit submit too soon.

On a commerical flight I could get either sullenberger or that germanwings pilot who flew everyone into the mountain because he was depressed. I did background investigations for my unit for a couple years; we would use them to determine who was fit to be armed. I became real good at looking at a guys references, driving record, interview, and general data to get a picture of what kind of person we were dealing with. I would use those same skills to evaluate a contract pilot.

​​​​​​
How will you evaluate if he/she can actually fly, and do it safely? Rely on the psychological review?
Old Boeing Driver is offline  

Thread Tools
Search this Thread

Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.