Wikiposts
Search
Biz Jets, Ag Flying, GA etc. The place for discussion of issues related to corporate, Ag and GA aviation. If you're a professional pilot and don't fly for the airlines then try here.

HondaJet pilot report?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 2nd Jun 2016, 07:09
  #21 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: cardiff
Posts: 61
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Reading that B&CA profile, they key pointers that stand out when pitched against the peers of the M2 and the Phenom 100 are that:

Cabin is O.K. size-wise, it's fast and its fuel efficient. Downsides are field performance - both take off distances and landing distance, payload with full fuel is poor, range with max payload is poor, watch the real Basic Operating Weight once you add the usual options - at least 300 lbs more than the 'brochure' figures. They're still waiting for known icing conditions approval and RVSM approval so not quite ticked all the boxes yet on the certification front.

So, I guess one could say it's similar in some respects to the older, smaller Lears, but without the range capability.
controlx is offline  
Old 2nd Jun 2016, 08:15
  #22 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: AZ, USA
Posts: 33
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by OFBSLF
AviationWeek just printed their pilot report:

HondaJet | Analysis and Pilot Report | Business Aviation content from Aviation Week


Quote:
The HondaJet interior fit, finish, and material quality is well behind a competitive Citation 525 series product or a EMB-500, with poor panel and cabinetry fitment.


Fred George of AviationWeek seemed to think differently:


Quote:
But the Profile only tells part of the story. The HondaJet raises the bar in entry-level light jets for passenger comfort, cabin quiet and baggage capacity. Optional luxury features, such as an externally serviced toilet and lavatory with running water, are not available in other light jets. The aircraft also has the best ride quality in turbulence of any entry-level light jet in production, in our opinion.

Fit and finish of this aircraft are unsurpassed in its class. Exterior surface tolerances are tight, all doors fit precisely and the paintwork is superb. The interior furnishings also are first rate, befitting of an aircraft that sells for more than $5.1 million with options.
I respect Fred's opinion. I would even agree that the interior "looks" nice. But when an interior specialist is picking apart deficiencies and making repairs on a HondaJet dealer's aircraft, that's much more telling than the relatively short period of time that Fred spent scrutinizing the aircraft for his report.
AZAV8R is offline  
Old 2nd Jun 2016, 20:03
  #23 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: Near Stuttgart, Germany
Posts: 1,095
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Downsides are field performance...
As much as I like the innovative (VFW 614 apart) concept of the aircraft, the takeoff distance of almost 4000ft quoted in that Aviation Week article for a light jet is a clear showstopper around here. What does anybody need a "lavatory sink with running water" for if he can't fly the aircraft in and out from the closest airfield? And 5+M$? Really?
what next is online now  
Old 3rd Jun 2016, 16:43
  #24 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: US
Posts: 604
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Honda has a good backlog of orders, so there seems to be a market for it.
OFBSLF is offline  
Old 3rd Jun 2016, 16:52
  #25 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Los Angeles, USA
Age: 52
Posts: 1,631
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
As much as I like the innovative (VFW 614 apart) concept of the aircraft, the takeoff distance of almost 4000ft quoted in that Aviation Week article for a light jet is a clear showstopper around here. What does anybody need a "lavatory sink with running water" for if he can't fly the aircraft in and out from the closest airfield? And 5+M$? Really?
A TBM is almost as much. Without a loo. What would you rather have?
AdamFrisch is offline  
Old 5th Jun 2016, 12:01
  #26 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: Near Stuttgart, Germany
Posts: 1,095
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Honda has a good backlog of orders, so there seems to be a market for it.
I believe that and I can understand that the HondaJet has a lot of appeal. In a country where 5000+ft long runways abound, it is certainly a good choice.
But not in my part of the world (which is why I wrote "around here"). We have lots of small regional airfields with runways between 3000 and 4000ft. Around here, a small jet must be capable to operate from those if you want to sell more than just a few. Dassault aircraft for example are specifically built with these runways in mind.

A TBM is almost as much. Without a loo. What would you rather have?
If my owner, employer or customer needs to fly to his holiday home on a mediterranean island which only has 3114ft of runway, there is not much choice, is there? As much as I would rather have that little jet, the TBM it's going to be... But if we make "unfair" comparisons (twin jet vs. turboprop single), how about this one: 5M$ buys you two freshly painted and upholstered Citation Bravos or Ultras with good engine times. Push one in the corner of your hangar and keep it for spares. The other one can fly in and out of "our" 3000ft runways with 8 people on board over more distance than the the Honda with just the pilots. And there is a toilet (no flowing water though). And the deal will leave you with a million $ of cash to buy the (little) extra fuel the Bravo needs for years and years to come.
what next is online now  
Old 4th Apr 2017, 10:36
  #27 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Newcastle
Posts: 76
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
All very quiet on the Hondajet front?

Strikes me that there is next to no buzz in the market about the Hondajet now it's in service. Presumably they've sorted by now RVSM, flights into known icing etc. etc. - a few handicaps still around after initial deliveries.

New sales must be ever so slow in the current market for this kind of baby jet at that price point? At this rate, the £1 Billion-plus development costs look like a 50+ year ROI!

Have they improved landing performance at all post-certification?

How many outside of the USA now with end-users, not the dealers?

Super little jet, just a decade or more late, perhaps.

When is the Hondajet II to be revealed? Might be a much better value beast, rather like the Phenom 300 when compared to the Phenom 100, lesson's learn't and all that.
Winniebago is offline  
Old 6th Apr 2017, 10:59
  #28 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Middle Earth
Posts: 899
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Winniebago
How many outside of the USA now with end-users, not the dealers?
There are four in Europe, two with dealers (Marshalls and Rheinland AS) and two with customers (one N reg & one F- reg)

FC
Fried_Chicken is offline  
Old 12th Apr 2017, 09:38
  #29 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Planet in Aldeberan System
Age: 54
Posts: 40
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
HondaJet Owner Tells his story

This video features a Honda Jet owner telling his story:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EQhLY8zdNCk
bizjetway is offline  
Old 12th Apr 2017, 21:36
  #30 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Deep inth Norhtern Hills
Posts: 264
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Honda Jet

Spoke to one of their sales staff at The GA show on Lake Constance last week, was full of the sales pitch stuff of exceeding all the performance predictions!
My owner got sick of the 6 year wait and got his deposit back last year.
It was nice to see it in the flesh rather than all the mock ups over the years. Hope it is better than the F1 project!
PENNINE BOY is offline  
Old 13th Apr 2017, 01:28
  #31 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: scotland
Age: 43
Posts: 132
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Did anyone see Top gear a few weeks back, it had Matt Ml Blanc do part of his race in a hondajet, he seems to like it as a passenger.

Fats
fatmanmedia is offline  
Old 14th Apr 2017, 12:07
  #32 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2014
Location: Village of Santo Poco
Posts: 869
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Winniebago

New sales must be ever so slow in the current market for this kind of baby jet at that price point? At this rate, the £1 Billion-plus development costs look like a 50+ year ROI!
I don't think Honda did this for the ROI, they did it to prove they could. I won't comment on the wisdom of such a thought process.
Amadis of Gaul is offline  
Old 19th Apr 2017, 14:48
  #33 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Newcastle
Posts: 76
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Amadis of Gaul
I don't think Honda did this for the ROI, they did it to prove they could. I won't comment on the wisdom of such a thought process.
You're probably right there. Still, even for a mega-corporation like Honda, the numbers are frightening. It's never going to be another Embraer who enter the biz jet market and within 10 years have a pretty significant market share.

I hope they do come up with follow-on models with lots of hindsight and lessons learn't and expedite the development and certification process such that by the time it hits the market, it's not effectively ten years too late for that particular niche. They need a pretty good crystal ball to know what the market will want by the time Hondajet II finally emerges.
Winniebago is offline  
Old 20th Apr 2017, 18:34
  #34 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Chobham
Posts: 116
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Amadis of Gaul
I don't think Honda did this for the ROI, they did it to prove they could. I won't comment on the wisdom of such a thought process.
You make it sound like the pursuit of developing the Bugatti Veyron for Volkswagen, ridiculously expensive vanity project, but ultimately a showcase of their technical capabilities. Arguably though, that genuinely ups the status of VW group overall, increasing car sales, whilst I doubt a similar effect could be seen to have crossed over into stronger brand and therefore sales for other Honda products. Yes, they're a very clever lot, those Honda guys, but will they have sold any more Civics or lawn mowers because they can make a clever little jet too - and the jet engine that goes in it? Would like to see a University study on that and brand value from doing crazy, clever, hideously expensive stuff! I wonder if someone really thought once, say fifteen years ago, they could sell a thousand Hondajets in several years? Or, it was just a technical showcase primarily and if they sold a few hundred over a few years, that would be a bonus?
fairflyer is offline  
Old 29th Apr 2017, 10:25
  #35 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2014
Location: Village of Santo Poco
Posts: 869
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by fairflyer
You make it sound like the pursuit of developing the Bugatti Veyron for Volkswagen, ridiculously expensive vanity project, but ultimately a showcase of their technical capabilities. Arguably though, that genuinely ups the status of VW group overall, increasing car sales, whilst I doubt a similar effect could be seen to have crossed over into stronger brand and therefore sales for other Honda products. Yes, they're a very clever lot, those Honda guys, but will they have sold any more Civics or lawn mowers because they can make a clever little jet too - and the jet engine that goes in it? Would like to see a University study on that and brand value from doing crazy, clever, hideously expensive stuff! I wonder if someone really thought once, say fifteen years ago, they could sell a thousand Hondajets in several years? Or, it was just a technical showcase primarily and if they sold a few hundred over a few years, that would be a bonus?
I have a hunch that it's a combination of all of the above. One perk of being a "mega-corporation" is that you can afford to experiment with things while looking decades down the road. Only Honda knows what their end game with all this is, and they're not really saying. Besides, "hideously expensive" is in the eyes of the beholder...
Amadis of Gaul is offline  
Old 30th Apr 2017, 07:05
  #36 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 1998
Location: Escapee from Ultima Thule
Posts: 4,273
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
I'm supposed to be off to N.Carolina for a type rating on the HondaJet in June. Provided it happens I'll let you know what it's like.
Tinstaafl is offline  
Old 15th May 2017, 12:08
  #37 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: United Kingdom
Posts: 5
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
As regards magazine etc articles, there are a good few now. I heard the latest issue of Car magazine had a piece and that there was a good one in Flying too...

https://www.topgear.com/car-news/top...mph-hondajet#1

https://www.topgear.com/car-news/top...mph-hondajet#1

Driver tests out firm's new £4m 'Civic of the Skies' plane | Daily Mail Online

Seems to be mostly positive feedback
gurumike is offline  
Old 15th May 2017, 23:19
  #38 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: United Kingdom
Posts: 5
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Sorry - posting fail, meant to post link to the Robb Report piece but doubled on the Top Gear...

The 500mph Honda | Robb Report
gurumike is offline  
Old 22nd May 2017, 07:14
  #39 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 1998
Location: UK
Posts: 74
Received 2 Likes on 1 Post
There's a review in this month's Pilot magazine in the UK.

The big thing that struck me was that it has a limiting crosswind of just 20 knots, said in the article to be down to the increase in keel area from the engine configuration.

20 knots is going to hamper sales, surely?
osbo is offline  
Old 22nd May 2017, 09:10
  #40 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Scotland
Posts: 891
Received 6 Likes on 2 Posts
Is it a hard limit of 20kts or is it similar to the Lear where they only quote a demonstrated crosswind of 25kts in the manuals and under Private Ops you are free to test your cohones above that should you wish?

I would imagine it would have a larger rudder than similar types with tail mounted engines since the asymmetric forces in engine failure are greater given the mounting position. Does the article mention the asymmetric handling qualities at all.?
Jwscud is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.