Wikiposts
Search
Biz Jets, Ag Flying, GA etc. The place for discussion of issues related to corporate, Ag and GA aviation. If you're a professional pilot and don't fly for the airlines then try here.

Bombardier bailout.

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 29th Oct 2015, 20:15
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: MAN
Posts: 769
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Bombardier bailout.

Bombardier Inc. tumbled the most in two months amid concern that a Quebec government rescue of as much as $1.3 billion won’t be enough to end the financial drain.


Bombardier Falls on Concern $1.3 Billion Aid Isn't Enough - Bloomberg Business
cldrvr is offline  
Old 29th Oct 2015, 21:55
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: MCO (occasionally)
Posts: 387
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
They need to dump the family and all the good old boy idiots calling the shots.

What a joke that brand is.

FR
FrankR is offline  
Old 30th Oct 2015, 21:02
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Permanently lost
Posts: 1,785
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I think it was the development costs of the C-series that has caused the problem, especially coming on top of reduced sales in the bizjet market.
PLovett is offline  
Old 9th Nov 2015, 19:57
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Chicago
Posts: 79
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I think it was the development costs of the C-series that has caused the problem, especially coming on top of reduced sales in the bizjet market.
That and spending over a billion developing the Learjet 85, which they've now had to write off and completely cancel, because the market for such midsize planes has shriveled, and a lot of the demand thats there is satisfied by used models or new copies of all the old designs still being produced at huge discounts, and the small niche of the market willing to pay real prices for new models is going to go for the Embraer 500 which is much more plane for about the same money.

Bombardier is screwed. They'll never get large C Series orders. The bottom half of their business jet model lineup has been completely surpassed by newer models from competitors. Their CRJ models are going to increasingly lose out to Embaer's E-jets. Their turboprop models will increasingly lose out to ATR.

Their only saving grace is the Global 7000/8000 project. Even with this, they have pushed back launch of the global 7000 2 years. And who knows how it will sell. The 7000 is the first purpose built business jet to be built with over 100' of length, which might scare off buyers if it prevents them from getting into their airports. And even if the program ends up going pretty well, would it be enough to save them from the disasters of their C-Series and Learjet programs? Maybe not.
tuna hp is offline  
Old 10th Nov 2015, 07:28
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Far away from LA
Posts: 1,032
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Their kiss of Death was Netjet's order.. EVERY company that took an order from Netjets ( whatever the market) took a hit somehow, when they leave, the company breathes again. Bombardier is no exception. ( even if not immediately related it is really interesting to see)

Next move for Netjets will be to buy chinesee aircrafts..
CL300 is offline  
Old 10th Nov 2015, 07:37
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: schermoney and left front seat
Age: 57
Posts: 2,438
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
CL300, that might be the case. What I never understood is the reasoning beyond short term profits when a manufacturer sells to NJ. They will loose clients, thus sales and they are increasingly in the hand of a giant.

A market almost exclusively in the hand of one player aint much of a market...
His dudeness is offline  
Old 10th Nov 2015, 08:44
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2014
Location: Sky
Posts: 330
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Their kiss of Death was Netjet's order..
B*llsh!t.... The main problem was the "orders" from Vista which are simple buy and flip orders which Bombardier apparently financed as well... Vista buys an aircraft and sells it within 3 years destroying the new aircraft and the aftermarket... The NetJets aircraft dont show up for at least 10 years in the aftermarket.
Global_Global is offline  
Old 10th Nov 2015, 11:41
  #8 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Far away from LA
Posts: 1,032
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Tell Beechcraft, Dassault, Cessna, Gulfstream..... They all loved the NJ way....

Time for the remainder players Bombardier and Embraer to suck it up, then "once bitten, twice shy" approach will come up...Just a matter of time..

Vista at least is paying for the orders they take..
CL300 is offline  
Old 10th Nov 2015, 13:51
  #9 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2014
Location: Sky
Posts: 330
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Vista at least is paying for the orders they take..
Word in Dorval when I picked up our 5000 was that Vista was definitely not paying themselves... NJ are supposed to be cash buyers (which makes sense taking their shareholder into account..)

What I never understood is the reasoning beyond short term profits when a manufacturer sells to NJ.
Banks like long term buyers like NJ as it allows them to predict cash flow on future sales They tend not to like our business as it is hard to predict when my boss wants to upgrade..
Global_Global is offline  
Old 10th Nov 2015, 16:24
  #10 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Far away from LA
Posts: 1,032
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Nj never took more than 10% of what they ordered, never.. And NJ does not buy itself, only takes delivery when aircraft is sold..whatever, it does not matter, it is just a comment on the last 20 years trend in the market, and at dawn of collapse ( or like it) NJ is present 2 to 3 years before hand
CL300 is offline  
Old 10th Nov 2015, 22:20
  #11 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Europe
Posts: 453
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Not sure that last statement is correct. Pretty sure they took way more then 10% of the Citations and Phenoms they ordered. In fact close to 100% of the firm orders for the Phenoms and not too far off for the Bravos and Excels/XLSs. Not sure about the Hawkers 750/800 and Citation Ultras/Encores/Xs but should be similar. Options are just that.

Sure, 2000LX and 7X are a different story.

Edited to say, they also took many 400XPs. Pretty sure it was at least all the firm orders. On the Phenom side of things they have recently converted options into firm orders.

Last edited by 733driver; 12th Nov 2015 at 20:24.
733driver is offline  
Old 12th Nov 2015, 20:15
  #12 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Up north
Posts: 1,657
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Yea how many 7Xs did they take in the end? 3? 5?

CP
CaptainProp is offline  
Old 13th Nov 2015, 06:25
  #13 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Far away from LA
Posts: 1,032
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
3 out of 60 ordered
2000 Exy the same, plus cancellation of all orders of LX's

Same with Raytheon, Cessna,Gulfstream...( ratio a bit better)
CL300 is offline  
Old 13th Nov 2015, 07:49
  #14 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2014
Location: Sky
Posts: 330
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Nj never took more than 10% of what they ordered, never..
So let's see: JetNet says they have 500 aircraft now so that means they ordered 5000 Oh but I think that is a lie too

The main order that was cancelled is the one from Dassault as they moved over to Bombardier. The only other main one was the Horizon, err H4000....
Global_Global is offline  
Old 13th Nov 2015, 10:39
  #15 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Far away from LA
Posts: 1,032
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
i am for another six months under confidential agreement, data are from the date Executive Jet was rebranded Netjets, and so forth around the world. Strangely enough one of my first company incorporated in Delaware in 1984 was doing Time sharing, we all saw NJ arriving, and i have a file with all the orders/cancelation/ lies and so on.. They are so bad in telling the truth that do not remember in their ad when they got created..

All good fun from outside..


https://youtu.be/KcYSnIf1V8k?list=PL593666ABA7A9BAD6


00:40 is a laugh..

Last edited by CL300; 13th Nov 2015 at 10:52. Reason: word missing
CL300 is offline  
Old 13th Nov 2015, 14:22
  #16 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2014
Location: Sky
Posts: 330
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Good look forward to your secret list of 5000 aircraft orders!
Global_Global is offline  
Old 13th Nov 2015, 14:29
  #17 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2014
Location: Sky
Posts: 330
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Oh and while you uncover the next Roswell: this is the what they say on their website https://www.netjets.com/ascend/artic...h-anniversary/ But I guess you know better
Global_Global is offline  
Old 13th Nov 2015, 15:28
  #18 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Far away from LA
Posts: 1,032
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
50 years... what a joke mate... Netjets was created out of Executive Jet in Boston in 1986..At the time of Santulli said the very famous sentence : " no Learjet ever over my dead body " Santulli gone here is Bombardier in the game. But If they count the wright brothers netjets is even older. When you have only a very fuzzy past, you can try to dilute the truth into a brainwashing machine hoping to have a better future.
With the internal memos , you would be surprised on how many aircrafts plus options plus plus plus, NJ totalized , But it does not matter, subject being that when Netjets touches a company, the stress put onto this company, suppliers, market is such that this brand is doomed for a period of time, except if this brand is kicking them out ( some did, even some Fbo did it).

It is not about Netjets bashing, it is just about correct recall of events.

But Netjets in 1965... I doubt, FAR 91.501 was not ever written...( this is NOT subchapter K)
CL300 is offline  
Old 13th Nov 2015, 19:57
  #19 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Europe
Posts: 453
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
I agree that NetJets has "only" been around (as a fractional operator) since 1986. That whole 50 year anniversary is a load of marketing bull in my opinion.

However, the order/vs. delivery ratio is not nearly as as bad as CL300 wants to make us believe.

It doesn't take internal memos to know how many planes were ordered/optioned. All involved were usually eager to get those press releases out.

It's true that the cancellations were usually not advertised but it's easy enough to google past orders and compare against publicly available information regarding past and current fleet size.

Of some types NetJets have taken more than the initial orders and of other types less.

NetJets have bought so many Citations and Hawker for example that I don't see how the manufacturers would have suffered from those deals. On the Phenom side of things they have already taken delivery of more than the initial 50 firm orders.
733driver is offline  
Old 14th Nov 2015, 11:38
  #20 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: schermoney and left front seat
Age: 57
Posts: 2,438
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
that I don't see how the manufacturers would have suffered from those deals.
Cause there are certainly a lot of people who gave up their flying or never started an ops of their own, but bought a FRACTION of an airplane.
Granted, there might be some who would never bought their own, still I think the ratio is more likely to be unfavorable for the manufacturers. Certainly NJ will not pay the same than a one or two airplane customer. So if you have to sell 10 aircraft to make the same margin that you could make on, say, 2 to individual clients... and as I said before, having to rely on one more or less giant operator instead of dozens of one time clients would give me sleepless nights.
I could be totally wrong btw.
His dudeness is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.