The latest one...
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: germany
Age: 52
Posts: 265
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
The latest one...
A (so far at least) reputable operator in southern Germany now obliges its new freelance pilots to pay the overnights themselves and...the yearly checkride has to be done in the simulator and paid by...you guessed it...the pilots.
Makes me wonder if we end up paying the fuel as well...???
Cecco
Makes me wonder if we end up paying the fuel as well...???
Cecco
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Up north
Posts: 1,657
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Is there not a note somewhere in OM A Chapter 7 "Definitions" along the lines of "Home base - Company needs to assign each crew member a home base..."? Further down under "Rest", "when away from home base.....company will provide suitable accommodation for ALL crew members..."
On the other hand, what to expect from companies hiring pilots with ratings they never completed proper training for. Not only that, also heard that one of the companies mentioned in the fake typerating rumours over past couple of months actually sent a post holder for "training" on the Gobal with one of "those" TRTOs.
Companies and managers setting the standard right?
CP
On the other hand, what to expect from companies hiring pilots with ratings they never completed proper training for. Not only that, also heard that one of the companies mentioned in the fake typerating rumours over past couple of months actually sent a post holder for "training" on the Gobal with one of "those" TRTOs.
Companies and managers setting the standard right?
CP
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: germany
Age: 52
Posts: 265
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Reputable by anybody's Standard. It's not FAI but you were close...
Of course, sim Training is a huge asset for safety improvement but if you have to pay it yourself each year...???
Cecco
Of course, sim Training is a huge asset for safety improvement but if you have to pay it yourself each year...???
Cecco
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: NE Europe
Age: 45
Posts: 104
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Its NOT only the managers .. sadly. I have done a small bit of contract work by myself. Usually our normal rate for short term contract is about 800 euros per day (plus per diems, accom and flight tickets in business). But last time I have had couple of refusals, because couple older TRI/TREs in midsize bizjet have did exactly the same work for 500 euros per day! Outrageous... I'm absolutely sure, that they KNEW the current market rate, but due their personal abilities they only can find lousy contract job and their only sale argument is cheap price.. And thats the point, whats actually worriyng me.
If managers find that it's ok to go for the cheapest, then I think, that it's more correct to blame our colleagues, who do whatever it takes, to get the position.
And I'm quite happy, that in current economic climate, I have generous permanent contract which allowes me to do occassional contract work.. And I dont have to sell myself cheap to get food on my table
If managers find that it's ok to go for the cheapest, then I think, that it's more correct to blame our colleagues, who do whatever it takes, to get the position.
And I'm quite happy, that in current economic climate, I have generous permanent contract which allowes me to do occassional contract work.. And I dont have to sell myself cheap to get food on my table
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: If this is Tuesday, it must be?
Posts: 651
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I'm a bit confused here. Training should always be paid for by your employer - but if you're freelance then you are the employer, therefore you pay for it yourself. As others have said, this should then be reflected in the rate you charge.
Similarly, as a freelance I don't have a company credit card so have often paid for overnights myself - but again this is added to the invoice so there is no problem in the long term.
And since the advent of EASA Part-FCL, all training must be done in a sim if it is available. AFAIK all the NAA's are interpreting "available" as meaning existing anywhere in the world, regardless of cost. So it's hardly fair to blame the company for that one!
All in all, someone complaining about a non existent problem.
People undercutting the market with unrealistic rates, on the other hand, is a major issue
Similarly, as a freelance I don't have a company credit card so have often paid for overnights myself - but again this is added to the invoice so there is no problem in the long term.
And since the advent of EASA Part-FCL, all training must be done in a sim if it is available. AFAIK all the NAA's are interpreting "available" as meaning existing anywhere in the world, regardless of cost. So it's hardly fair to blame the company for that one!
All in all, someone complaining about a non existent problem.
People undercutting the market with unrealistic rates, on the other hand, is a major issue
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Up north
Posts: 1,657
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
And since the advent of EASA Part-FCL, all training must be done in a sim if it is available. AFAIK all the NAA's are interpreting "available" as meaning existing anywhere in the world, regardless of cost. So it's hardly fair to blame the company for that one!
CP
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: If this is Tuesday, it must be?
Posts: 651
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I agree simulator training done properly is superior to training in the aircraft; however, training in the aircraft done properly is superior to simulator training done poorly.
Training in the aircraft is in no way "unsafe" (again with the caveat of being done properly), but it is now against the regulations.
The implication of the OP was that having to do training in the sim was a requirement of the company. I was just pointing out that this is not the case.
Training in the aircraft is in no way "unsafe" (again with the caveat of being done properly), but it is now against the regulations.
The implication of the OP was that having to do training in the sim was a requirement of the company. I was just pointing out that this is not the case.
who is it?
They pay for the overnights themselves and donīt get it back, thatīs the point...
Cecco
Cecco
I previously worked for a company like that. They tore up my contract and put me on "freelance", with abysmal rates. I didn't have much choice at first but to accept the rates and carry on, but then one day the Chief Pilot rang me to tell me that there was a flight booked for the next day, and that I should report at 6am to the airfield. I told him - "sorry, I am flying for another company tomorrow - can't make it!". He had to cancel the flight - which was with a regular client. He soon realised that you can't actually run a reliable operation using freelance pilots.
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: germany
Age: 52
Posts: 265
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
The freelance aircrew being offered the "new" contract have the pay-it-yourself clause in their contract. Freelance people, who have been longer with this company get their overnights paid/reimbursed. However, I imagine that their contract is subject to change for the worse soon. People who have a fix job there get their overnights/flight training paid.
Cecco
Cecco
From the Aero-Dienst website:
Can't possibly be them then....
Jobs
Our highly trained and highly motivated employees are the core of our success.
Jobs
Last edited by Trim Stab; 16th Sep 2013 at 09:03.
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Up north
Posts: 1,657
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
The freelance aircrew being offered the "new" contract have the pay-it-yourself clause in their contract.
How do these companies get around ESET, CRM and other company linked training requirements when using freelancers? Fake training documents here as well?
CP
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: Near Stuttgart, Germany
Posts: 1,095
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
How do these companies get around ESET, CRM and other company linked training requirements when using freelancers? Fake training documents here as well?
And regarding the self-paid overnights: When I was freelancing back then I actually preferred to pay for my own hotel (of my own choice) and claim the official per-diem allowance. Because I could deduct the hotel cost from my taxes and the per-diem is tax-free, so overall it was better. As long as we don't know the exact contract terms of these guys it is a bit difficult to judge what's going on. Too much hearsay and twittering as far as I am concerned.
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Up north
Posts: 1,657
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
So as a freelance pilot, on top of paying for hotels and simulator training, which is ok as long as the daily rate reflects that, you also fly around to perhaps 3-4 companies every year doing company training, all out of your own pocket? Right.
My guess is that the majority of freelance pilots out there are not completing the required training. Even if they wanted to, these companies would just tell them to wind their neck in and take the job or they'll get other pilots to do the job. For less money. Lets not even get started on insurance coverage when doing freelance jobs...... This is a can of worms that has been discussed here before. In my opinion proper insurance coverage can be ensured, the problem is that many pilots forget to check this, not with the operator, but directly with the insurance company.
CP
My guess is that the majority of freelance pilots out there are not completing the required training. Even if they wanted to, these companies would just tell them to wind their neck in and take the job or they'll get other pilots to do the job. For less money. Lets not even get started on insurance coverage when doing freelance jobs...... This is a can of worms that has been discussed here before. In my opinion proper insurance coverage can be ensured, the problem is that many pilots forget to check this, not with the operator, but directly with the insurance company.
CP
I think it is about time that EASA made it a requirement for AOC flying that all crew have permanent contracts, with their rosta declared in the contract.
I know from my own brief and unpleasant experience when I was forced by my employer to go freelance that it is detrimental to safety. The financial insecurity added to my personal stress before I even got to the aircraft. I had absolutely no rosta and was on call 24/7 which basically ruled out any social life. Then, as I had to take another non-flying job to make ends meet, I found myself reporting for duty on occasions not properly rested (maybe 2 hours sleep on one occasion). It was also very divisive amongst crews because some remained on fixed contracts, and others not.
If EASA made freelance flying illegal on AOCs it would put most of the cowboy operators out of business too.
I know from my own brief and unpleasant experience when I was forced by my employer to go freelance that it is detrimental to safety. The financial insecurity added to my personal stress before I even got to the aircraft. I had absolutely no rosta and was on call 24/7 which basically ruled out any social life. Then, as I had to take another non-flying job to make ends meet, I found myself reporting for duty on occasions not properly rested (maybe 2 hours sleep on one occasion). It was also very divisive amongst crews because some remained on fixed contracts, and others not.
If EASA made freelance flying illegal on AOCs it would put most of the cowboy operators out of business too.