how is airspeed reduced if no speed control instructions from controller?
Thread Starter
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: beijing
Posts: 27
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
how is airspeed reduced if no speed control instructions from controller?
hye, when descending from crusing level , how is airspeed reduced if no speed control instructions from controller? is KIAS or throttle level kept constant during descending?
2-3 knots? Pah! Why so slow? You could easily go 1-2 knots faster!
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Your nearest Marriott
Posts: 1,127
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Climb .80 , cruise .80 and descend at .80 , start reducing speed at about 12500 ft to ensure 250 knots at 10,000.
With a 2.7 degree descent angle this works out perfectly.
With a 2.7 degree descent angle this works out perfectly.
Join Date: Sep 1999
Location: ME
Posts: 5,505
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Climb .80
12500 ft to ensure 250 knots at 10,000.
Mutt
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: World
Posts: 2,563
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
In our type (C56X) a descent with 2000/2500 fpm and maximum speed usually works fine.
At about 9000 ft we reduce to 250 (260 knots plane limitation at 8000 ft), with passengers on board we aim to be at 200 knots at about glide interception, and where passenger comfort is not a priority (ferry?) and if requested by ATC to maintain high speed we can maintain 250 until 6/7 nm on final.
Not personally a big fan of this super high speed approach but can be done.
At about 9000 ft we reduce to 250 (260 knots plane limitation at 8000 ft), with passengers on board we aim to be at 200 knots at about glide interception, and where passenger comfort is not a priority (ferry?) and if requested by ATC to maintain high speed we can maintain 250 until 6/7 nm on final.
Not personally a big fan of this super high speed approach but can be done.
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Your nearest Marriott
Posts: 1,127
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Mutt, when leaving Jeddah, I like to do it as fast as possible
I use .75 when climbing between JED-RUH or else we tend to get held down in the mid thirties.
When given cleared high speed, I transition to 300 until asked to slow down or until it becomes too bumpy, or we need to slow down, so as to be 220 at LOC intercept, unless instructed otherwise. ATC has thanked us a few times for flying this profile so I guess we are ok??
Have a feeling I am about to get schooled here, but by you, no problem
Why 2.7% - we have found that it allows a nearly idle thrust descent without the use of speed brakes. Our principle doesn't like speed brakes being used. It just works for hitting numbers and speeds without being forced to work too hard. Plus I find that when we set anything over a three degree slope we never actually reach calculated top of descent before ATC descends us.
Cheers
I use .75 when climbing between JED-RUH or else we tend to get held down in the mid thirties.
When given cleared high speed, I transition to 300 until asked to slow down or until it becomes too bumpy, or we need to slow down, so as to be 220 at LOC intercept, unless instructed otherwise. ATC has thanked us a few times for flying this profile so I guess we are ok??
Have a feeling I am about to get schooled here, but by you, no problem
Why 2.7% - we have found that it allows a nearly idle thrust descent without the use of speed brakes. Our principle doesn't like speed brakes being used. It just works for hitting numbers and speeds without being forced to work too hard. Plus I find that when we set anything over a three degree slope we never actually reach calculated top of descent before ATC descends us.
Cheers
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: any town as retired.
Posts: 2,182
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
2.7 is very popular
many of the FMS procedures do not work very well in G550 at 3.0.....not quite enough margin before the POWER anuc, and loss of auto speed looms.....set 2.7....
true on G450 too, often set at 2.5 there, same logic...
certainly not FLC at TOD, and 4-5000 fpm downards......
glf
true on G450 too, often set at 2.5 there, same logic...
certainly not FLC at TOD, and 4-5000 fpm downards......
glf
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: Near Stuttgart, Germany
Posts: 1,095
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
How do you know? You´re not supposed to hear it!
Last edited by what next; 27th Nov 2011 at 17:44.
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: schermoney and left front seat
Age: 57
Posts: 2,438
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
What next, probably or rather most likely the same little dude...
I remember the face of the predecessor of said guy as a DO when they flew an approach into your home base with said CB tripped and loads of thunderstorms and turbulence around. He really looked troubled...
I remember the face of the predecessor of said guy as a DO when they flew an approach into your home base with said CB tripped and loads of thunderstorms and turbulence around. He really looked troubled...
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: In the boot of my car!
Posts: 5,982
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
How do you know? You´re not supposed to hear it!
Pace
PPRuNe supporter
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Planet Earth
Posts: 1,677
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
But really: If you want to fly slowly, take a Cessna 152
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Jungle or Sand!!!!!!
Posts: 153
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
In this part the world (somewhere near the ALPS) a well thought out and planned descent goes down the tubes when your told to descend 200nm before TOD.
Then it's fifty frequency changes of "slow down", "speed up", slow down", "Speed up" to a final cap of "if you dont speed up down the Glide I am going to ban you from our airspace", trying to softy place your noise around the bell triggers.
Just before planting your rubber to the asphalt the principle wants to know why the scenic tour of rocks and snow was conducted at anal clenching (his words) height (he prefers some couple of thousands more, seeing he invested in something that can fly some 30000ft higher).
(story was given a slightly humours effect to those who want to start bashing)
Then it's fifty frequency changes of "slow down", "speed up", slow down", "Speed up" to a final cap of "if you dont speed up down the Glide I am going to ban you from our airspace", trying to softy place your noise around the bell triggers.
Just before planting your rubber to the asphalt the principle wants to know why the scenic tour of rocks and snow was conducted at anal clenching (his words) height (he prefers some couple of thousands more, seeing he invested in something that can fly some 30000ft higher).
(story was given a slightly humours effect to those who want to start bashing)
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: uk
Age: 75
Posts: 588
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Quote
Probably can't do that in a Lear because it will go supersonic
Yes on 35's 25,s 24,s it would go supersonic about 5 seconds after the wings came off. In the late 60's early 70's a lot of lears crashed in the USA and very soon the investigators would go straght to the remains o the CB panel to see if the overspeed and mach CB's had ben pulled. Invariably yes. The straight wing lears had a nasty habit of tucking at about M .85, that is why the CAA reduced the MMO a tad.
Your Kapitan CB puller must have been ex Luftwaffer so he would have had permission to be a prat
Probably can't do that in a Lear because it will go supersonic
Yes on 35's 25,s 24,s it would go supersonic about 5 seconds after the wings came off. In the late 60's early 70's a lot of lears crashed in the USA and very soon the investigators would go straght to the remains o the CB panel to see if the overspeed and mach CB's had ben pulled. Invariably yes. The straight wing lears had a nasty habit of tucking at about M .85, that is why the CAA reduced the MMO a tad.
Your Kapitan CB puller must have been ex Luftwaffer so he would have had permission to be a prat