Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Aircrew Forums > Biz Jets, Ag Flying, GA etc.
Reload this Page >

Pilatus PC 24 - new GA aircraft

Wikiposts
Search
Biz Jets, Ag Flying, GA etc. The place for discussion of issues related to corporate, Ag and GA aviation. If you're a professional pilot and don't fly for the airlines then try here.

Pilatus PC 24 - new GA aircraft

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 23rd May 2014, 08:01
  #41 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: uk
Age: 75
Posts: 588
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Mix and Match


Those who think that operating an exec jet means flying a few wealthy celebs around usually get a rude awakening when they find 2-300 hours a year does not pay the bills,
My charter business is:
10% medevac
20% celebs etc
20% freight (usually outsize)
15% cram as many in as you can brigade (min 10 pax)
10% I want to go now and I mean now
25% Rescue of broken Cessnas/Lears/Challengers/etc


It has to be 99.9% reliable to cater for our biggest segment. Any one suggest a suitable aircraft? I do love my old Hawkers but I am tempted.
hawker750 is offline  
Old 31st Jul 2014, 11:47
  #42 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Cockpit
Age: 58
Posts: 26
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
See that Pilatus has the official launch tomorrow.

Hope to see some video & pictures somewhere?

HF
HansFlyer is offline  
Old 2nd Aug 2014, 10:02
  #43 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Groland
Posts: 63
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Welcome to Pilatus Aircraft Ltd


Looks remarkably like a Phenom 300.
CEQforever is offline  
Old 2nd Aug 2014, 18:45
  #44 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: Orrville OH, USA
Age: 39
Posts: 1
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
As someone who has been flying cargo in a PC-12 for the last 6 years I can attest that the PC-12 has changed the Air Freight industry. The demands of the industry have changed and Pilatus and the PC-24 are ahead of the curve.

Right now the US automotive industry is being supplemented by Mexican, and Canadian plants. Just in time manufacturing is here to stay and so manufactures routinely need parts rushed from Mexico to Detroit, from Canada to Mexico and all over the US. The ability to fly a 2,500 lb payload non stop from the US/Canadian Border to the US/Mexican border in a matter of a couple hours single pilot, will make a PC-24 an Ideal airplane for cargo.

Only thing preventing this airplane from becoming a mainstay in Cargo Aviation is the fact that Pilatus won't take any more orders untill 2020.

I my mind who wouldn't want a PC-24? It can do Medivac, Cargo ,Business, International, Unimproved Runways, Short Commuter, Possible Military use. Just try and name an money making sector in aviation who couldn't in some manner use a PC24?
MidnightPC12Pilot is offline  
Old 11th May 2015, 10:57
  #45 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Europe
Posts: 651
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
She flew!

Successful first flight of the PC24 this morning, 09:58 central european summer time. Just in time to spread the news at EBACE, too.

Looked great for sure!

A first photo:
PC24 Jetvisuals
INNflight is offline  
Old 14th May 2015, 12:41
  #46 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Chobham
Posts: 116
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
PC-24 looks larger than a Phenom 300. What is the closest match size-wise whether in production still or not? Looks closer to Hawker 125-800 size doesn't it? Talking about the cabin space, not the whole jet.
fairflyer is offline  
Old 14th May 2015, 14:27
  #47 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: World
Posts: 2,563
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by fairflyer
PC-24 looks larger than a Phenom 300. What is the closest match size-wise whether in production still or not? Looks closer to Hawker 125-800 size doesn't it? Talking about the cabin space, not the whole jet.
Similar to an Excel/XLS but not as much cabin height.
dirk85 is offline  
Old 14th May 2015, 23:28
  #48 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: N/A
Posts: 5,933
Received 392 Likes on 207 Posts
First flight

megan is offline  
Old 11th Sep 2017, 08:04
  #49 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 1,780
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The test aircraft was passing through Prestwick yesterday, on its way back to Stans from North American flight testing. It is a real stunner when seen close up - really good build quality. Apparently Vref is about 90 knots! I would have liked to see double nose-wheel though on a plane that has such good hot/high and off-piste capability.
Trim Stab is offline  
Old 11th Sep 2017, 09:41
  #50 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: East Angular - apparently!
Posts: 746
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
I'll admit to being prejudiced, but there's an awful lot of 125/Hawker in that aircraft...
barry lloyd is online now  
Old 28th Jun 2018, 08:52
  #51 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Hither and Thither
Posts: 575
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I see that unpaved runway testing is being carried out at Woodbridge at the moment:
AINONLINE
Red Four is offline  
Old 28th Jun 2018, 19:55
  #52 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: The wrong time zone...
Posts: 843
Received 58 Likes on 23 Posts
Thanks for posting - it is a versatile jet!
I wonder why the ground spoilers appear to take so long to deploy on touchdown?
josephfeatherweight is offline  
Old 28th Jun 2018, 20:13
  #53 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: USA
Posts: 460
Likes: 0
Received 46 Likes on 20 Posts
Looks like a great ship. I wonder how long the compressor and turbine blades will last. At least with their turboprops they had really good particle separators, what’s on the jet to prevent FOD and dust/sand issues?
havick is offline  
Old 29th Jun 2018, 18:15
  #54 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Far away from LA
Posts: 1,032
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by josephfeatherweight
Thanks for posting - it is a versatile jet!
I wonder why the ground spoilers appear to take so long to deploy on touchdown?
Certification delay..
CL300 is offline  
Old 12th Jul 2018, 16:11
  #55 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2018
Location: Lagos
Posts: 13
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
We need to keep in mind that a business jet with short field unpaved runways capabilities has to be designed ruggedized. This would penalize performances and range and material choice. You cannot use too much secondary composite structure if you want to take off and land from gravel.
Bola1 is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.