Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Aircrew Forums > Biz Jets, Ag Flying, GA etc.
Reload this Page >

Blink 3 Mustangs up for sale . . .

Wikiposts
Search
Biz Jets, Ag Flying, GA etc. The place for discussion of issues related to corporate, Ag and GA aviation. If you're a professional pilot and don't fly for the airlines then try here.

Blink 3 Mustangs up for sale . . .

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 1st Jul 2010, 18:56
  #61 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: EGGD KFXE EGBJ
Posts: 138
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
hi ad did u get to sa
Martin Barnes is offline  
Old 6th Jul 2010, 12:42
  #62 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: South Est
Posts: 231
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
On many flights Blink are MORE expensive than most CJ1's etc... The Mustang isn't as good as a CJ1, therefore why would anyone want to pay more....for less?

I guess the start up capital is running out, and there is no desire from investors to keep pouring water into the blink spounge.

They have successfully got some people to charter, that otherwise wouldn't have done so, but when the client see's the CJ's they're parked next to in Cannes or Geneva and finds out its the same or maybe less cost.........
You can fool some of the people all of the time, and all of the people some of the time, but you can not fool all of the people all of the time.Abraham Lincoln, (attributed)
16th president of US (1809 - 1865).
flynowpaylater is offline  
Old 6th Jul 2010, 16:01
  #63 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Bristol
Age: 54
Posts: 867
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Flynow....post later.....

Where have you been....keep up boy!
Phil Brockwell is offline  
Old 7th Jul 2010, 06:12
  #64 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Bishop's Stortford
Posts: 48
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Aircraft at Blackbushe

Does it not stand to reason that if you've had two to three aircraft almost permanently on the ground at Blackbushe for near on the last two years, perhaps three now, it's time to get rid of a couple at least? Another winter looming and those birds will just get covered in snow and ice for another season not going anywhere.
Avioactive is offline  
Old 7th Jul 2010, 06:49
  #65 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Bristol
Age: 54
Posts: 867
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Avioactive....good point well made and all that, but, if you were in the position of having aircraft underutilised picking multiple bases to spread your markets would be the right thing to do....exactly what Blink have done.

If they are offloading excess supply, and marketing the hell out of the concept whilst doing the smart thing of multi-basing, It is for the good of the company......so, whilst the concept of a huge fleet of VLJ's is probably not likely in this, or any economic situation, they are adapting as they learn and while that may sound really patronising, it's not as patronising as the press releases that told us how they had invented an industry that we have all spent 20 years working in.

I think we all have suspicions that the concept does not work on the scale that was originally designed due to the scaleability (sp) of certain departments within a bespoke service product, but credit where credit is due, their business decisions are unflawed (except, obviously the one where they signed up to 45 mustangs and told all the brokers they don't need them).

PB
Phil Brockwell is offline  
Old 7th Jul 2010, 08:53
  #66 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: 14 days away 14 at home
Posts: 699
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
but credit where credit is due, their business decisions are unflawed (except, obviously the one where they signed up to 45 mustangs and told all the brokers they don't need them).
LOL thanks Phil. That is a classic
No RYR for me is offline  
Old 7th Jul 2010, 11:23
  #67 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: South Est
Posts: 231
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
it's not as patronising as the press releases that told us how they had invented an industry that we have all spent 20 years working in.
Quite right Mr B. Surely they must have realised that this might raise a few eyebrows within an already very established and potentially over subscribed market?
A company round my way have developed the blink principle on surface transport...... they're called Ali's cabs. If only I'd have thought of this. Phil, why do we keep missing the boat?..........Urika!!!, lets sail boats between Dover and Calais and allow lorries and cars on board. This time next year Rodney....
flynowpaylater is offline  
Old 10th Jul 2010, 22:26
  #68 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: toronto
Posts: 427
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
London Executive Aviation selling off December 2010 delivery position . . .

2010 CESSNA CITATION MUSTANG Jet Aircraft For Sale At Controller.com
robbreid is offline  
Old 11th Jul 2010, 06:51
  #69 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Various at the moment
Posts: 1,171
Likes: 0
Received 7 Likes on 1 Post
Maybe Ambeo will be next to move their's on when the Phenom arrives
dc9-32 is offline  
Old 12th Jul 2010, 09:28
  #70 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: 14 days away 14 at home
Posts: 699
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Blink vs LEA

The main difference between LEA and Blink is that LEA is a well established charter operator who did not claim to change the world but just that the Mustang is an aircraft that moves some Kingair Customers to Jets. As far as I know most of the LEA aircraft are privately owned... and the orderbook is less than 45

Here from 2008
George Galanopoulos, LEA’s managing director, is delighted with aircraft’s introduction. “The Mustang is ideal for customers who travel in small numbers and want to upgrade from a turbo-prop without paying a premium. It is also proving attractive to existing jet customers, who may not always need the extra capacity and cabin space of traditional entry-level jets.”
No RYR for me is offline  
Old 12th Jul 2010, 11:21
  #71 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 1,780
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I have to say the P100 seems to me a superior product
On paper specs maybe - but I have heard that performance is nowhere near the specs, particularly landing performance.
Trim Stab is offline  
Old 12th Jul 2010, 12:32
  #72 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: uk
Posts: 30
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Think LEA just received there first Phenom 100 G-CGNP a few days ago, serial number 50000146
SkyTrax2 is offline  
Old 12th Jul 2010, 15:14
  #73 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: UK
Age: 62
Posts: 363
Received 5 Likes on 3 Posts
-NP is a Legacy 500, not a Phenom
Sepp is offline  
Old 12th Jul 2010, 15:49
  #74 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: In Exile...
Posts: 332
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Not on G-INFO it isn't...EMB500 is the CAA's way of saying it's a Phenom 100. Is this owned by LEA or managed?

In fact, the L500 hasn't even flown yet...
x933 is offline  
Old 12th Jul 2010, 15:56
  #75 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: UK
Age: 62
Posts: 363
Received 5 Likes on 3 Posts
Then I stand corrected...

edit/ Ah, I see... wake up at the back!
Sepp is offline  
Old 14th Jul 2010, 09:53
  #76 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Location: Location:
Age: 53
Posts: 1,110
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Having sat in one last week, I cant help but be really impressed with the Phenom. Its a big little jet and anybody who picks a mustang over it (notwithstanding the extra $400k) is nuts.

Regarding this "extra" performace are we not gettting confused with pre first flight pledges against certified data. I'd like to think that what the book says is exactly what it will do, no more no less, it would be unusual for the manufacturer to put 2000 hrs on a pair of test frames and not spot a little extra performace that operators have found having put a couple of hundred hours on them. I doubt the FAA/EASA would allow a 5% innaccuracy good or bad in the data

Its also not unusual for FADEC engines to give a little extra thrust at ISA + 1 or +2 as opposed to the ISA figures which are commonly quoted beefing up the rumours that its better than book.

5% seems a little too good to be true from testing to line flying, but from design to certification would seem a little more believable

2 mins on google found this

Embraer seems to have quite a bit to crow about when its pledges for the Phenom 100 are examined against the actual airplane. An Embraer spokesman said the company promised customers a 380-knot aircraft capable of 1,160 nm of range at 41,000 feet, plus a landing distance of 3,000 feet. When it was certified, the Phenom came in at 390 knots and 1,178 nm with a 2,699-foot landing roll. Block fuel for a 1,000-nm trip was initially planned at 1,960 pounds but by certification had dropped to 1,889 pounds. The Phenom’s capacity for baggage is 25 percent higher than originally planned.
Great aircraft by all accounts, whatever the story with the performance
G-SPOTs Lost is offline  
Old 15th Jul 2010, 12:53
  #77 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: 14 days away 14 at home
Posts: 699
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Is it an idea to make a seperate Embraer 100 vs Mustang thread?

Back on topic: how many are still advertised as being for sale?
No RYR for me is offline  
Old 21st Nov 2010, 12:04
  #78 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: in the barrel
Posts: 147
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Mustang "toilet"

Highflight420, you wrote that people are actually using the toilet in the Mustang. Well, these must have been some serious emergencies then.

Do you have any special fitments in the Blink jets to provide more privacy? I can hardly imagine any passenger (especially female ones) taking a leak (or worse) just behind the FO's seat, in full view from the passenger cabin.

I'd seriously be interested in how a commercial operator handles this problem.
AviatorDave is offline  
Old 21st Nov 2010, 13:04
  #79 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: uk
Posts: 123
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
There is a curtain between the cockpit and the cabin and another that goes around the toilet itself - its not ideal but many passengers, male and female have used ours at Ambeo without problems. We always suggested to passengers they use the toilet at the FBO before flight.
proceeding outbound is offline  
Old 21st Nov 2010, 15:14
  #80 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: in the barrel
Posts: 147
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Mustang

Thanks for your reply. I would have expected the high-end clientele using such air transport services to be more picky about the toilet issue.
It was one of the things which I thought would make running a commercial service using Mustangs difficult. Interesting ...
AviatorDave is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.