Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Aircrew Forums > Biz Jets, Ag Flying, GA etc.
Reload this Page >

The best aircraft in and out of La Môle (LFTZ)

Biz Jets, Ag Flying, GA etc. The place for discussion of issues related to corporate, Ag and GA aviation. If you're a professional pilot and don't fly for the airlines then try here.

The best aircraft in and out of La Môle (LFTZ)

Old 18th Jun 2010, 08:34
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Switzerland
Posts: 25
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The best aircraft in and out of La Môle (LFTZ)

Hello,

Let's assume for a second that you want to operate in and out of St-Tropez's airfield, la Môle. Ideally with 4 to 6 pax and 2 pilots.

The aircraft can be a turboprop (PC12, KA 200-350), but a jet is vastly preferred. We have been thinking about CJ1 / 1+ - CJ2 /2+ and Premier 1A. Anyone has another idea?

When leaving La Môle, again ideally with 4 to 6 pax, destination is not more than 400NM away.

The aircraft is to be commercially operated, but the owner's flights to La Môle would be done under private rules. This part is cleared, so no sweat there.

The question is, what aircraft would you prefer and why? Budget is not part of the equation, what counts is finding out the best bird for the mission.

Standing by for comments from the experts
pascualito is offline  
Old 18th Jun 2010, 09:29
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 1,780
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
If you need to be able to get out of La Môle with 6 pax in any wind conditions then you will need a PC12.

If you insist on jet, and can accept that there might be rare occasions when wind conditions mean you can't depart, then go for CJ2. There are other light jets that could do the job - but CJs are easier to acquire, operate, and sell than most.

If budget really is no limit, you could look at Falcons. There is one Falcon 50 permanently based there.
Trim Stab is offline  
Old 18th Jun 2010, 10:09
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Scotland
Posts: 269
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
If its commercially operated dont consider a CJ2 because you will never make the figures work, would love to see someone demonstrate to me you can do it on a CJ1.

I think a Citation V probably could do it commercially but we havent tried and dont fancy it either!
Deeko01 is offline  
Old 18th Jun 2010, 10:19
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: schermoney and left front seat
Age: 57
Posts: 2,437
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I do have experience in the B200 and the CJ1/CJ2/2+....can´t comment on the others.

From a pilots point of view, I´d prefer the B200, as it is the best bird (IMO) to deal with gusty and high crosswinds and downdrafts, which is an issue at La Mole. Stopping (Landing distance) is no issue at all with a TP. Also birdstrike wise, a turboprop offers more safety. Take one with a Raisbeck conversion and Proline 21.
From the passengers point, clearly the CJ2/2+. (although there are some pax, especially when tall, that like the squared cabin of the B200 better, because there is way more headroom)
Cabin is very very quiet and is big enough for four to be comfy and bearable with 6. The smaller CJ1 is okay for 4, but like a cattle transport with 6.

Fuelwise, the B200 and CJ2 will be roughly the same, flying time is though pretty different for your 400nm trip. Difference would be something like 30 minutes.

I love both birds, wish I´d fly them more often these days....

I was involved as a mx manager in the operation of a Premier 1 in 2006/07, and frankly, for what I´ve seen in mx issues I wouldn´t want one of these. (I´ve heard its becomming better, but...) As a pilot I can`t comment though.
His dudeness is offline  
Old 18th Jun 2010, 14:42
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: italy
Age: 56
Posts: 269
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
What about the new King Air 350i
or the Piaggio?
ra4000 is offline  
Old 18th Jun 2010, 17:48
  #6 (permalink)  

Aviator Extraordinaire
 
Join Date: May 2000
Location: Oklahoma City, Oklahoma USA
Age: 76
Posts: 2,394
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
As Trim posted, if you have the budget, a Falcon 50EX. With only six passengers and fuel for only a 400 mile leg you will have astonishing short field takeoff performance.
con-pilot is offline  
Old 18th Jun 2010, 21:01
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Location: Location
Posts: 76
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
What about a big helicopter?

No landing or take-off distances to worry about

Where's me coat?
G-DAVE is offline  
Old 18th Jun 2010, 22:48
  #8 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: up there somewhere
Posts: 12
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Premier 1 the One

Premier 1 would get my vote - unless the runway is wet.
But normally works well out of La Mole - especially if private.
Nice cabin, good speed can stop short if required.
Falconman is offline  
Old 19th Jun 2010, 04:26
  #9 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: I can see it from here.
Posts: 678
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
50EX every time.
NuName is offline  
Old 19th Jun 2010, 06:47
  #10 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Far away from LA
Posts: 1,032
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Any CRE available to do la môle training on the Premier ?

By the amount of CJ impounded there because having landed without the training, and have to be ferried out by a CRE/CRI; this should be considered..

LFTZ changed owner recently, but DGAC does not seem to be willing to change the rules.

As for choice of planes, R/C model have little margin; a Falcon 50 or a 7X ( both types being approved into LFTZ) are the types to go for...

The Piaggio is not an option, since with the noise abatment (1800 rpm approach), the runway is too short; and every airport in the south of France is looking for a way to get rid of it. ( they found some, it is under study with the DGAC legal department).
CL300 is offline  
Old 19th Jun 2010, 06:55
  #11 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Europe
Posts: 130
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
We are operating the Kingair 350 and 350i regularly around LFTZ, to great passenger and pilot satisfaction.
Cap Loko is offline  
Old 19th Jun 2010, 06:55
  #12 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: here and there, mostly there...
Posts: 330
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
la mole

must agree on the 50ex
natops is offline  
Old 19th Jun 2010, 23:15
  #13 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Glasgow
Posts: 20
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Gentlemens,
You are looking for the BEST airplane in and out of la Môle?
Did you know that the 7X is certified for this airfield? Otherwise, yes, Falcon 50, or even Falcon 10.
NICOOOLDUDU is offline  
Old 20th Jun 2010, 08:23
  #14 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Switzerland
Posts: 25
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Thanks to all for your enlighted replies so far.

Could anyone shed more light on the differences in performance between the CJ1/1+ - CJ2/2+ and the P1A?

The later might be preferred because of the nicer cabin, but it will be no use if it is too limited in terms of max pax load compared to the CJ's...

Any info is much appreciated.

Cheers
pascualito is offline  
Old 20th Jun 2010, 08:25
  #15 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Switzerland
Posts: 25
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Ah, sorry,

Previous post is referring to perf in and out of LFTZ, of course.

Ciao
pascualito is offline  
Old 2nd Sep 2010, 12:41
  #16 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Tallinn
Posts: 35
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Is there any aircraft other than Falcon 50 that would be suitable for regular London - La Mole (4 pax) and a monthly London - New York (one stop and 2-4 pax). All private ops.

Last edited by tallinnman; 2nd Sep 2010 at 14:08. Reason: Bad english
tallinnman is offline  
Old 2nd Sep 2010, 13:04
  #17 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: where the money is
Posts: 385
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I hear that the Gulfstreams have excellent runway performance, despite the fact that they can do without leading edge devices... If you shy away from the DA50 for cost reasons, then see what you can find out about a G450/550 etc. You'll be surprised.
jetopa is offline  
Old 2nd Sep 2010, 14:10
  #18 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Tallinn
Posts: 35
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Gulfstream out of the price range - thinking anything similar or slightly smaller than DA50.
tallinnman is offline  
Old 2nd Sep 2010, 17:25
  #19 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Paris
Posts: 10
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
For the kind of flights/costs you are requesting, I'm afraid the FA50 will be your only chance.
You may try to call La Mole airport to check what kind of aircrafts are approved.
I do fly to La Mole with a FA50B, and if you strictly comply with the performances you're limited to 2 pax in commercial ops....(that's the only way we use it)
You should check about private ops with a FA50B and FA50EX.
I guess the 7X is not an option for you......(too bad cause, if I'm right, it could fly non-stop to New-York from La Mole....)
The Falcon50 is also London-City approved ....

Jetopa said :"I hear that the Gulfstreams have excellent runway performance", I do not know where he heard that but I've never seen any Gulfstream at La Mole airport neither at London City (except for the G150, but is this really a Gulfstream ....?)

Good luck ...

Christophe.
sky51 is offline  
Old 2nd Sep 2010, 19:45
  #20 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: schermoney and left front seat
Age: 57
Posts: 2,437
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Tallinnman, what about the Sovereign? I´d say its hard to find a better performer on the runway, takeoff, SEclimb and landing wise.

With 4 guys you´d be good for 2300-2400nm range...however playin it safe would be a second stop, say La Mole - Brest (555nm) - Gander (1950nm) - NY (955nm).

Or LFTZ-BIRK (1590nm)-NY (2266nm)

Or LFTZ-LPAZ (1491nm)-NY (2255nm)

[all great circle distances)

Possible TOW at 0 wind at for 3412ft TODA is

15° 30° 40°
29108 27897 26798
which leaves if the airplanes BOW is 18150lbs and 1000lbs payload

9958lbs 8747lbs 7648lbs of fuel available...

with 5 kts of hw its roughly 700lbs more

Max fuel is 11200lbs.

With the given weight for 40° you´d require a mission fuel for LFTZ-LPAZ of 6758 before reserves at ISA +10 and at a 50kts heaedwind in FL410. Flying at FL450 would see you at 6052lbs required before reserve.

At 30° you`d require 6822lbs at FL410 or 6160lbs at 450...
Thats tight but doable IMO. (all at max cruise btw)

Landing:
MLW 27100lbs.

at 15° LDR is 2649 ft, at 30° 2748ft, at 40° its 2813ft.

If you´d use a safety factor of 1,25 you´d be LDW limited at 30° to 26839lbs and at 40° to 25906lbs. That would mean a remaining fuel of (at 4 pax=1000lbs) of 6700+ pounds (at 40°). More than enough to go back to the cheaper fuel in London...you require roughly 5000-5500 including reserves to London at FL370, ISA +10 and 50kts HW.
His dudeness is offline  

Thread Tools
Search this Thread

Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.