Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Aircrew Forums > Biz Jets, Ag Flying, GA etc.
Reload this Page >

Saudi wives in the baggage hold of a Challenger

Wikiposts
Search
Biz Jets, Ag Flying, GA etc. The place for discussion of issues related to corporate, Ag and GA aviation. If you're a professional pilot and don't fly for the airlines then try here.

Saudi wives in the baggage hold of a Challenger

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 13th Sep 2009, 14:45
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: N/A
Posts: 131
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Saudi wives in the baggage hold of a Challenger

I heard an unbelievable story yesterday. It's second hand, but here it is.

It seems that a Saudi man who owns a Challenger, has installed in the baggage hold of his aircraft, a couple jump-seats where he installs his wives when he travels with them. This is for when he travels with business partners, so that his wives do not mingle with the others.

If true, that he can get away with this in Saudi Arabia, I could understand for there, some people are above the law, but how come the authorities of the countries where he flies to accept such a practise?

Anyone know about this ?
Minorite invisible is offline  
Old 13th Sep 2009, 14:48
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: UK
Age: 85
Posts: 49
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Gives a whole new meaning to SLF
two green one prayer is offline  
Old 13th Sep 2009, 14:55
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: Arizona USA
Posts: 8,571
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
There is an STC for this very mod, so I understand.
411A is offline  
Old 13th Sep 2009, 15:17
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Australia
Posts: 2,167
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
So they don't need to follow the instructions of the crew in an emergency then?

I guess it would be a bit hard from a windowless compartment isolated from the cabin!!

And I'd thought I'd heard it all
nitpicker330 is offline  
Old 13th Sep 2009, 16:03
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: Planet Earth
Posts: 276
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I wonder if those poor wives still use that old line... " not my Mohammed , he`s different..." ha ha ha , I guess not. Frankly if you`re that controllable , you deserve it.
6000PIC is offline  
Old 13th Sep 2009, 16:21
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: center of the world
Posts: 28
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Is this a factory option or aftermarket ? how many seats ? where can i get it ?
captainmorgan888 is offline  
Old 13th Sep 2009, 19:07
  #7 (permalink)  

Aviator Extraordinaire
 
Join Date: May 2000
Location: Oklahoma City, Oklahoma USA
Age: 76
Posts: 2,394
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I can't speak for the Challenger, however, I was told by some people with Dassault that they had a middle east customer request a window be installed in the baggage compartment on a Falcon 900. When Dassault inquired for the reason of the request, they were told that the owner planned to carry two if his servants in the baggage compartment on some trips and wanted a window installed so they could see out.

Dassault did not install the window.

(In case you are curious the Falcon 900 aft baggage compartment is accessible in flight through a door in the aft lav, below FL 410.)
con-pilot is offline  
Old 14th Sep 2009, 08:36
  #8 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: any town as retired.
Posts: 2,182
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
sit two DS in aft lav

Two DS sitting in the aft lav, cos the owner did not wish to polute the cabin with them.

glf
Gulfstreamaviator is offline  
Old 14th Sep 2009, 09:37
  #9 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: UK
Posts: 1,211
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Don't see what the problem is.
south coast is offline  
Old 14th Sep 2009, 14:57
  #10 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: germany
Posts: 146
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Problem is racism and middle age thinking
lear60fellow is offline  
Old 14th Sep 2009, 17:55
  #11 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: UK
Posts: 1,211
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
OK, now I am lost.

I thought we were all in agreement there is nothing wrong with where ever the Saudi wants his wife/wives to travel, be it in the cabin or baggage compartment.

His plane, his wife/wives, his decision, surely!
south coast is offline  
Old 14th Sep 2009, 18:02
  #12 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: NY
Posts: 51
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
411A-
There is an STC for this very mod, so I understand.
Does the mod contain a tie-down point for the shackles or is that extra?
g21agoose is offline  
Old 14th Sep 2009, 18:14
  #13 (permalink)  
Flintstone
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
The baggage locker on a Challenger is exactly ten paces behind the principal seat.

Coincidence? I think we should be told.
 
Old 15th Sep 2009, 00:06
  #14 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Brisbane, Australia
Age: 44
Posts: 46
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
His plane, his wife/wives, his decision, surely!
Some of us believe that women are people, not property.
Torquatus is offline  
Old 15th Sep 2009, 09:45
  #15 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Europe
Posts: 651
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Some of us believe that women are people, not property.
Surely most of them wouldn't mind the odd trip to Paris on a jumpseat with no windows when they get to go on a shopping spree spending 50k afterwards.

Lets face it, I don't agree with what is happening there, but there's millions of women that have waay more serious problems.
INNflight is offline  
Old 15th Sep 2009, 20:20
  #16 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: any town as retired.
Posts: 2,182
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Some of us believe that women are people, not property.

Now that sort of thinking is just not acceptable.

Whatever makes you think that women are people, as long as you believe that you will never be happy in my sand pit.

glf
Gulfstreamaviator is offline  
Old 17th Sep 2009, 15:25
  #17 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: From Despair To Nowhere
Posts: 130
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Innflight

I'm not sure that makes it acceptable.
12Watt Tim is offline  
Old 17th Sep 2009, 19:48
  #18 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: UK
Posts: 1,211
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Get a grip dim Tim!
south coast is offline  
Old 18th Sep 2009, 03:22
  #19 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Hants, UK
Posts: 1,064
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
QUOTE
exactly ten paces behind the principal seat
UNQUOTE

I thought that the first Gulf War and the risk of unexploded land mines had changed that tradition to ten paces IN FRONT..
eyeinthesky is offline  
Old 18th Sep 2009, 03:37
  #20 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Harvest, Alabama
Posts: 109
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Often landing in Doha or Stanstead there was a ACJ in private livery and Qatar registration.

Many times, in Doha, there were 1 or 2 757's in same private livery.

Finally at UK end, ran into crew in Ops. The ACJ was only for the wives weekly shopping run to London, and 90% of what came back was from Harrods. The rest was in hand carry, very small ornate ribbon-wraped boxes.
singpilot is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.