Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Aircrew Forums > Biz Jets, Ag Flying, GA etc.
Reload this Page >

Logging IFR hours - is my thinking correct?

Biz Jets, Ag Flying, GA etc. The place for discussion of issues related to corporate, Ag and GA aviation. If you're a professional pilot and don't fly for the airlines then try here.

Logging IFR hours - is my thinking correct?

Old 29th Dec 2013, 11:39
  #121 (permalink)  

Avoid imitations
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Wandering the FIR and cyberspace often at highly unsociable times
Posts: 12,698
Now, let's have the same discussion about PICUS...
I never log P1CUS - my log book doesn't have a column for that.

Anyway, after two years since the discussion ended, who really cares?
ShyTorque is online now  
Old 30th Dec 2013, 13:04
  #122 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: EU
Posts: 1,218
Indeed.
Mikehotel152 is offline  
Old 30th Dec 2013, 13:41
  #123 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: ITALY
Posts: 120
yankees....

Last edited by duxone; 30th Dec 2013 at 14:03.
duxone is offline  
Old 2nd Jan 2014, 08:00
  #124 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 1,739
Mikehotel is correct on this.

If you file an IFR flight plan, log the flight as IFR. End of story.

If you want to record your time flying IMC, then log this in a separate column - though I can't see why you would want to log time spent flying IMC.

Employers are not the slightest bit interested in seeing how much time you have spent flying in clouds - what they are interested in is your experience flying under IFR. And as Mikehotel implies, this largely equates to time on type.

And for those who log time spent "flying with sole reference to instruments" as interpreted by some on here - how do you time it? Do you start a stopwatch every time you fly into a cloud?
Trim Stab is offline  
Old 2nd Jan 2014, 11:31
  #125 (permalink)  

ECON cruise, LR cruise...
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: MIRSI hold - give or take...
Age: 48
Posts: 564
Hey, why don't we say that "operating" the aircraft in IMC should be defined as actually operating it yourself, ie no AP allowed?

As a previous poster said, sitting eating a 3-course meal at FL450 hardly counts as instrument time, and I would agree. On the other hand, sitting at FL450, only watching the AP fly the aircraft, would hardly make you a more proficient pilot than doing so while consuming your meal.

So now - how much "real" IFR experience do you have based on that criterion?

TBH, IFR time expresses the total experience of the pilot operating according to IFR rules, at least in Part-OPS-land. It's a measure of how well versed he'll be expected to be in instrument flight procedures, how likely he is to get lost in a reversal procedure, how well he must be expected to be able to handle an RNP-arrival etc. etc. It relates to proficiency in the operating environment.

As for the time spent in IMC - well... If you're spending your time inside clouds watching the AFCS handle the aircraft for you... How does that make IMC-time any measure of your proficiency?? Yes, you can't see out - but you don't need to, as you have the crutch of automatics. Remove that crutch, and let's see what happens, should we?

Don't get me wrong - I am a strong proponent of using an appropriate automation level at all times. But the entire debate smacks of w1lly-waving, "my IFR time is better than yours, because I only count the real time I can't see out"

Look at your license - see who's issued it - consult their regs - record IAW same - end of.
Empty Cruise is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Thread Tools
Search this Thread

Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service - Do Not Sell My Personal Information

Copyright 2018 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.