Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Aircrew Forums > Biz Jets, Ag Flying, GA etc.
Reload this Page >

Starting an air charter company

Wikiposts
Search
Biz Jets, Ag Flying, GA etc. The place for discussion of issues related to corporate, Ag and GA aviation. If you're a professional pilot and don't fly for the airlines then try here.

Starting an air charter company

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 5th May 2004, 07:13
  #21 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: UK
Posts: 45
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
You can get a Citation in to Denham its true, but, its not a great deal of fun and you cant do it public transport

If your using a C500 / C501 for public transport once you get less that 1200m you need to get your head in the books for figures and weights, more than that you are OK (or used to be) aat MAX AUW. You need more than 1200m for an ultra, or bravo.

That said 1200m is no problem at all in those aircraft.
High Viz Vest is offline  
Old 16th May 2004, 05:56
  #22 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Bloomfield, New Jersey
Posts: 1
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
You can check out www.planequest.com they have a lot of good information on operating cost of many types of airplanes (US dollars).

A twin Cessna would be better than a Navajo. Its easier to get parts for a Twin Cessna then the Navajo. It would be still better to have a King Air, best would be a light jet, if you have the money.

Look to see if a charter company is for sale in your country.
It would be far easier to buy a existing company then to start a new one. Plus if you need a business loan its easier to get a loan for a existing company.


JH
airlinepilot1 is offline  
Old 17th May 2004, 12:45
  #23 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Bristol
Age: 54
Posts: 867
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Don't listen to any hogwash about what aircraft is "best", look at what your local potential client base are likely to fly in, there is no point in targetting a market that does not meet your demographic. There is a market for almost any aircraft,

Quote....................................................... .......................
A twin Cessna would be better than a Navajo. Its easier to get parts for a Twin Cessna then the Navajo. It would be still better to have a King Air, best would be a light jet, if you have the money.

Unquote..................................................... ..............................

Remember, a Seneca that is flying is better than a 747 that is parked.

Phil
Phil Brockwell is offline  
Old 27th May 2004, 20:19
  #24 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: southport uk
Posts: 1
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Smile Citations in denham

I have been operating the C550 for 8 years into Denham legally on FAA figures Part 91. But the day has got to be right with WAT figures not forgetting you may land in the morning during summer and end up grounded PM if it gets too hot. Forget the CAA numbers or AOC numbers these are FAA FLT Manual approved figures. And dont listen too the rubbish about thrust reverser failures, they don't even come into the calculations its all done on the brakes. Reversers being the icing on the cake. As for failures ( I don't think there are many Jet aircraft around that would stop in less than 8000' of runway anyway without brakes). So if you continue applying God knows how many factors over and above the designers figures where do you stop. In theory you would never take off. Use the aircraft as they were intended and designed to be used within the legal limits of the flight manual and for once enjoy your flying and stop moaning if your company impose tighter restrictions. Lets face it, its the closest your going to get to landing on a carrier in a civil aircraft.

PS I have thousands more hours on Citations than 1000

Last edited by iflyanything; 27th May 2004 at 21:49.
iflyanything is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.