Apollo Command Module?
 

To fly again?.

http://www.spaceref.com/news/viewsr.html?pid=9031

Cool. Maybe they should look at bringing back the Saturn V while they're at it...

Concidering how much things have progressed since then, I would think only the outside shell would be as original spec,.
the command and service module was prolly 16k pre 286 computer technology, although I believe it was the first vehicle to utilise fly by wire.
I thought Dick Rutan had the brief to design a lifeboat for the ISS, I have seen a clip of his vehicle, looks like a very small lifting body with a para wing deploying in the lower atmosphere.
Rutan usualy does good work.

I think you're right about that Drapes, but IIRC the computer in the CM had 256 bytes (0.256 k) of 'core' i.e. the tiny magnetic doughnuts strung on wires, and the cpu was made of individual transistors and very crude chips. Amazing what they did with what they had, though!

I used to work with Dec PDP 11s that had real core memory. Great stuff - it had the useful characteristic of retaining content without the need for power. No need for a hard disk. Very useful in harsh environments, where hard disks might 'crash' - and in those days hard disks were massive for not much capacity, and unreliable.

SSD

We were still using PDP11's until only a few years ago!

VA

I worked with ARTS IIIAs with core memory a few years ago at DCA and IAD. Worked fine except there was too much software and proccessing to do. Obviously inefficiently written code.

As I understand it the Shuttle still uses 386 computers, apparently the reletivly lare size of the internal structure of the CPU makes it less suseptible to cosmic ray damage.
I did not have time to read the whole article when I posted it, is it their intention to carry the CMS up in the Shuttle bay?, or launch it on a rebuilt Saturn 4B ?.
As I said I have seen a clip of Rutans lifeboat, it was dropped from high altitude and worked fine, so he must have been a long way along with the project, I wonder why it was abandoned.