RAF B17s
 

Did we have them? Just watching a documentary on Frank Williams and there was a shot of a B17 with RAF roundals on it.

I know that 90 Squadron operated them.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/No._90_Squadron_RAF

206 Squadron flew them - not when I was on it, I hasten to add.

214sqn had them for early electronic warfare

Also for early Air Sea Rescue and convoy cover.

https://number59squadron.com/fortress.html

Didn't Errol Flynn make a film of the early B17 (pre 'F' model) in RAF markings?

Try reading “A Thousand shall Fall” by Murray Peden. One of the best books on Bomber Command operations I’ve read: he starts on Stirlings and then goes on to Fortresses on 214 Sqn, and describes much of their operations (and losses) at length.

Boeing B17 Fortress In RAF Coastal Command Service
 

This topic has previously covered on this Forum.
However the B17 saw active service with 206 and 220 Sqdns out of the Azores in 1943/44/45. My Father was a F/Eng on 220 Sqdn in 1943/44 at Lagens
Operation Alacrity covers all the detail and Information can be found in the following reference:-
Boeing B17 Fortress In RAF Coastal Command Service By Robert M Stitt ISBN 978-83-65281-54-8.
Unlike the badly researched TV series which which gives all the credit to the B24, the B17 was credited with the following.
11 U Boats were sunk ( 206 - 6 and 220 - 4 with one shared ) and 6 damaged( 206 - 4, 220 -2 )
Additionally the Aeroplane served in 519 Met Sqdn and various trials units.
***

I can't vouch for the accuracy of this but it seems very well researched:https://www.thedrive.com/the-war-zon...y-was-a-fiasco

It was a fiasco. I. in 1965 was the O/C records on 90 Sqn. The whole story of their involvement with the B17 was laid out.

Fantastic! Fly at 30 thousand feet and nothing could touch you. All the breathing gear. electrical heated suits but no knowledge of upper air winds to guide the bomb aimers and then there were the Me 109s that could get up to 30 grand. Rear gunners? The B17 hadn't invented the bicycle seat so that a gunner could crouch under the fin assembly and shoot back. Two waist gunners constantly bumping into each other would try and protect the tail.

The squadron records didn't mention morale, Probably for a good reason.

As a high altitude Bomber the Fortress I was a disappointment for RAF.
Several suffered structural failure, breaking up at altitude.

Thanks for all the info, guys.

Facebook has a pretty active 47 group with members worldwide.

Perhaps they can be of help.

https://www.facebook.com/groups/182656038598089

rolling, could you elaborate please, first I've heard of it.

Certainly. It is mentioned in 'Before the Storm' by Robert Jackson. 90 Squadron lost 2 Fortress Is 'through structural failure following loss of control during high altitude training flights. Both these accidents were caused by turbulence, the extent and violence of which at altitudes of over 30,000 feet was still an unknown quantity'.
One would assume that if 2 were lost in training this way, then potentially others went the same way on ops.
​​

Some info here: https://aviation-safety.net/wikibase/74496
I believe there was at least 1 B17C ( which is the model the RAF named Fortress Is) which broke up in flight with the USAAF, so again one assumes more were lost in this way.

At least 3 Fortress Is from Polebrook were lost as a result of in-flight breakups, in June/July 1941 and January 1942.

When I read structural failure I thought you were alluding to design or manufacturing failures, many aircraft were/are lost through over stressing, poking the bear is what leads to over stressing, no matter if it's a Tiger Moth or a Boeing jet (BOAC 707 Mount Fuji). Had a Cessna 210 come down a few miles from the house recently after losing a fight with thunder storm at 9,000', shed both wings, two deaths, pilot and co-pilot, the passenger was OK, he was already encased in a coffin.