Astronauts criticise "First Man" movie
Fellow astronauts and pilots, as well as Republican politicians, have criticised Hollywood's seventy-million-dollar depiction of the first Moon landing, which fails to show Neil Armstrong and "Buzz" Aldrin planting the US flag. Others have described the "First Man" movie as "anti-American." At the Venice film festival, Ryan Gosling, who plays Armstrong in the film, ignited controversy by describing the American achievement as "transcending countries and borders."
The story has been running in the US for several days, but here is a summary in The Daily Telegraph (London): https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/201...eaves-us-flag/ |
Perhaps those who feel it's anti-American should be reminded that a plaque on the Lander states Here men from the planet Earth first set foot upon the Moon, July 1969 A.D. We came in peace for all mankind . This is from https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lunar_plaque which points out that the statement "We came in peace for all mankind" is derived from the 1958 National Aeronautics and Space Act's "declaration of policy and purpose": 'The Congress hereby declares that it is the policy of the United States that activities in space should be devoted to peaceful purposes for the benefit of all mankind.'
Which bit of "all" do they not understand? |
I thought the Saturn V rocket was designed by a German
|
These days people whinge about absolutely everything.
Makes them feel important I guess. What other reason could there be? |
Did they change "July 1969 AD" to the more politically correct "July 1969 CE"?
I'm sure they would have wanted to........ |
Originally Posted by wub
(Post 10241633)
I thought the Saturn V rocket was designed by a German
In case anyone here has not looked at the specification and performance of the Saturn V, it is truly astonishing - still the most powerful vehicle ever created: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Saturn_V |
I believe the Saturn V made the loudest sustained sound created by mankind. Even The Who pale into insignificance in comparison... :)
If you haven't read it, Carrying the Fire by Mike Collins is a terrific account of the Apollo Program. I will get this film when it's out on DVD and gets cheap - I suspect I'll be disappointed though. |
Oh dear oh dear. Snowflakes are on a mission. After the number of US flags that appeared in Armageddon,this will restore the balalnce.
|
Ah..”Fun with Flags”...
Joking aside and never mind the the new Apollo film, there really is at least one academic paper on the subject of the Apollo flags here: https://www.jsc.nasa.gov/history/flag/flag.htm As can be seen the whole subject was both from a political and and engineering POV “non-trivial”. FWIW as for today... https://www.hq.nasa.gov/alsj/ApolloFlags-Condition.html . https://phys.org/news/2012-07-flags-...ites-moon.html |
Originally Posted by treadigraph
(Post 10242039)
I believe the Saturn V made the loudest sustained sound created by mankind. Even The Who pale into insignificance in comparison... :)
If you haven't read it, Carrying the Fire by Mike Collins is a terrific account of the Apollo Program. I will get this film when it's out on DVD and gets cheap - I suspect I'll be disappointed though. The Who only got from Soho down to Brighton. We could hear this thunderous device from Cape Canaveral down to Fort Lauderdale, 195 miles away. And why the hell shouldn't Americans be proud of this fantastic achievement? I'm not American but I feel privileged to have had a few of my tax dollars invested in this magnificent enterprise. And why is it that so much attention is given to these worthless snowflakes who have achieved nothing? |
I've followed a bit of the controversy, and do think it's basically nationalist snowflakes.
It surely shows Americans landing on the Moon, through American efforts. AIUI, they do show the flag in the background in several shots. Not showing the specific moment where they plant the flag is neither here nor there to the overall story. G |
Snowflakes?
Urban Dictionary: Snowflake Overly patriotic perhaps, but the "snowflakes" over here are not the ones bemoaning this issue. Much the opposite. |
Originally Posted by climber314
(Post 10243925)
Snowflakes?
Urban Dictionary: Snowflake Overly patriotic perhaps, but the "snowflakes" over here are not the ones bemoaning this issue. Much the opposite. Don't think either Buzz Aldrin or Chuck Yeager fit that description. I would have been less surprised if they and the Republican politicians criticising the movie had been labelled as jingoists, although IMO that would be inaccurate. Much of the rancour seems to have been provoked by comments relating to the movie, rather than the movie itself. |
Originally Posted by climber314
(Post 10243925)
Snowflakes?
Urban Dictionary: Snowflake Overly patriotic perhaps, but the "snowflakes" over here are not the ones bemoaning this issue. Much the opposite. |
Originally Posted by FlightlessParrot
(Post 10244584)
I think you might have missed the ironic counter-application of the term. It's quite common.
THIS British Humor: Actually FUNNY! https://cimg8.ibsrv.net/gimg/www.gmf...46faa4495b.jpg The previously posted Ironic Counter-Intuitive snowflake BALDERDASH: Not so much! |
Yes, although by the 1960s when he was working on the Saturn project, Wehrner von Braun may have regarded himself as a first-generation American, having emigrated there in 1946. When his biopic was made (early 60s?), I fondly recall a graffito on an advert for it in IIRC, Oxford Circus Tube Station. Under the film's title "I Aim at the Stars" was scrawled ".... but sometimes I hit London!" |
All times are GMT. The time now is 15:48. |
Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.