You can download the report from here https://www.gov.uk/aaib-reports/13-1...f-21-june-1974 The report also stated that the aircraft took out the ILS localiser aerial which was located 168m (550ft) from the end of the runway.
|
Originally Posted by LTNman
(Post 9511695)
You can download the report from here https://www.gov.uk/aaib-reports/13-1...f-21-june-1974 The report also stated that the aircraft took out the ILS localiser aerial which was located 168m (550ft) from the end of the runway.
|
Yes indeed, I have just read the report fully again which states that approach lights 305 metres (1000ft) from the end of the runway were also damaged. The approach lights to 08 were not the full standard length due to falling ground so I would think the aircraft took out part of the first row before descending into the valley.
The report stated that the take off distance available (TODA) was approximately 178ft below the end of the runway. |
Not surprisingly, the captain did not fly any more for Dan-Air.
|
Boeing 727's always seemed in my eyes to need more of Luton's runway to get airborne. In fact it was a Dan-Air 727 that took out some of Luton's approach lights and ILS. I seem to remember when reading the accident report that the aircraft then dropped into the valley before climbing away to head for Gatwick for a emergency landing. |
These photos show the 727 damage. Firstly the lights at the end of the pavement, the wooden fence and then the localiser. The ground drops away sharply thereafter.
http://i68.tinypic.com/2rnty6x.jpg http://i68.tinypic.com/mav3x3.jpg http://i66.tinypic.com/bfryc8.jpg |
I have never seen those photos before. The pavement in the first photo was the end of the stopway and not the runway, the smashed light was 200ft from the end of the runway and was only 1ft above the ground.
|
I was in the approach room that morning, just finishing a night duty, when all the localiser alarms went off! The crew wouldn't have it at first that they had hit anything. The rolling of the aircraft was due to the damage to the undercarriage doors which stopped when they dropped the gear. I thought they lowered the gear quite early on but the report doesn't seem to say this.
We handed over to the oncoming watch and slid off home to bed!! |
I was a member of the oncoming watch and went out in the Land Rover with another ATCO, (FB). In the remains of the LLZ we found and recovered the 'tail bumper' of the 727! I think we actually tried to lift it and put it in the Landie but no suprises that we couldn't lift it and it wouldn't fit. We recieved a report later, (whether true or not I'm not sure) that parts of the LLZ structure were still embedded in the aft fuselage and some had penetrated the pressure hull.
Just a note. I haven't read the AIB report since it was originally published in case my memory is faulty here. |
Just to add....As I walked in through the door of the VCR all the night tower staff were staring towards the climb out and the remarks being made were of the nature best described as 'expletive deleted'. For a second or two I couldn't see anything then, trailing a dirty exhaust trail, the 727 appeared from behind the MacAlpine hangar slowly climbing away!
|
With the airport's departure lounge marque in the background an interesting day for the airport but what year was the photo taken?
http://i1320.photobucket.com/albums/...ps3cbwna44.jpg Probably from the Dave Gearing collection |
A click on the photo shows 19751215 Diversions. No Court Line Aircraft or Court Line ground equipment visible.
|
Was OY-APU the previous G-BBZG of Monarch? CAA show de-reg date as 5.12.75 so that is additional evidence
|
What type is the KLM?
|
Originally Posted by OUAQUKGF Ops
(Post 9521976)
A click on the photo shows 19751215 Diversions. No Court Line Aircraft or Court Line ground equipment visible.
Yes, G-BBZG became OY-APU with Maersk Air. |
Pointing nose out is a BEA Trident. I thought they had autoland abilities.
|
Thanks, I was confused by the KLM type, as the angle of the picture hides the #3 engine neatly behind the #4.
|
I assume what is now mid-term was car park then. But look how empty it is? This is when the loss of Court Line and the highly seasonal nature of traffic meant the airport would I guess be not very in busy in the winter. What is the 732 in front of Hanger 89?
|
Originally Posted by LTNman
(Post 9521916)
With the airport's departure lounge marque in the background an interesting day for the airport but what year was the photo taken?
|
Originally Posted by 22/04
(Post 9522278)
I assume what is now mid-term was car park then. But look how empty it is? This is when the loss of Court Line and the highly seasonal nature of traffic meant the airport would I guess be very in busy in the winter. What is the 732 in front of Hanger 89?
|
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:34. |
Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.