Vulcan tried to escape from Wellesbourne, 16th Sept 2022
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: England
Age: 58
Posts: 60
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
.
"When health and safety law does not apply
In most cases, health and safety law does not apply where volunteering does not involve an employer."
Thought police antagonist
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Where I always have been...firmly in the real world
Posts: 1,371
Received 99 Likes
on
70 Posts
Only if the organisation involved has at least one employee. 655MaPS who look after the aircraft and were involved in the incident is entirely voluntary. Granted its not totally clear how the aircraft being owned by the airfield might affect this position but there would seem to be no employer - volunteer relationship which means that Health And Safety laws do not apply.
.
.
"When health and safety law does not apply
In most cases, health and safety law does not apply where volunteering does not involve an employer."In case you were wondering, for me the purpose of an investigation is to establish what went wrong....and why. Not a "blame game " exercise...that's counter productive in flight safety, albeit for some organisations it's sadly still in place. The only time I'm in favour of finding fault and attributing blame is when it's warranted by virtue of those involved being cavalier and indifferent to the rules they feel don't apply to them.
Remember also, this aircraft, whilst it's not flying, is still a working and functioning aircraft and the public can get very close to it. Once you allow the public to be in close, or even relatively close, proximity to a complex and potentially very dangerous piece of machinery, then you need to ensure all measures that can be taken for their protection can and will be, in place.
Think about it, all of us who have been involved with live aircraft had the dangers and safety aspects drummed into us from day 1 and continuously after that. Most of the general public don't and are therefore dependent on organisations and trained personnel who do.
Last edited by Krystal n chips; 18th Sep 2022 at 16:27.
Join Date: Dec 2021
Location: London
Posts: 53
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Then there was the Lightning doing a high power run with an engineer on board.
It overode the chocks and the engineer (who was not a fullly qualified pilot) took off did a crcuit and landed safely.
It overode the chocks and the engineer (who was not a fullly qualified pilot) took off did a crcuit and landed safely.
Last edited by common toad; 18th Sep 2022 at 17:21.
Only if the organisation involved has at least one employee. 655MaPS who look after the aircraft and were involved in the incident is entirely voluntary. Granted its not totally clear how the aircraft being owned by the airfield might affect this position but there would seem to be no employer - volunteer relationship which means that Health And Safety laws do not apply.
.
.
"When health and safety law does not apply
In most cases, health and safety law does not apply where volunteering does not involve an employer."The airframe is owned by a “shell” company which has some form of contract with 655MaPS to maintain and preserve the airframe and presumably to organise events to fund its activities. 655MaPS would appear to be a voluntary unincorporated body and does not seem to be registered as a charity. Whether it conducts its business through elected officers or has appointed trustees is unclear. The significance of unincorporated status is that although you may effect insurance to mitigate personal loss, all members of the society have unlimited liability should anything go wrong. The trouble with insurance is that you never know if it will work until you need it. A sobering thought!
Now, the “shell” or holding company also owns Wellsbourne Mountford Airfield but plainly neither manages or operates it. The management is contracted out to another company which, according to their last published accounts, employs an average of 9 people. 655MaPS will have to have some form of contract with the management company who will have a duty of care to ensure that activities conducted on the site are done so in a safe manner. This will include ensuring that proper risk assessments are carried out.
It seems pretty clear that although the company owning the site has no employees and 655MaPS is voluntary the incident occurred on a site for which the management company, which has employees, has overall control. Were I a director of the management company I would have had an urgent meeting with responsible officers of 655MaPS and advised them to make a short factual report of the incident to their insurers, the HSE and the local authority. I would also advise them that my own reports would be filed in 2 hours time.
YS
I’d be very surprised if there wasn’t a subsequent official overview, HSE and/or CAA aerodrome licensing, of their procedures to ensure that their procedures are robust in the event of an over run. Hopefully that’s already included in their airfield risk assessments anyway. If it is, and they worked, then there’s nothing to see, if not we can assume changes in the future.
Join Date: Nov 2019
Location: Scotland
Posts: 129
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Having looked at the images, and the location on Google Maps, I am a little surprised that this sort of activity by this sort of aircraft is permitted at this site, when no traffic lights appear to be im place controlling the traffic..or have I missed them????? I operated for many years on an aircraft of similar vintage, on a runaway with a public road crossing at one end, and there were traffic lights controlling traffic for all arrivals and departures. This beast came within a gnat's c**k of creating some much larger headlines. I would suggest that someone, somewhere has dropped the ball a little from a risk assessment perspective. No doubt that will now be rectified - both here and elsewhere - albeit I suggest the cost and inconvenience of implementing traffic control measures might be undersireable given a simpler, more obvious and cost-free solution.
Having looked at the images, and the location on Google Maps, I am a little surprised that this sort of activity by this sort of aircraft is permitted at this site, when no traffic lights appear to be im place controlling the traffic..or have I missed them????? I operated for many years on an aircraft of similar vintage, on a runaway with a public road crossing at one end, and there were traffic lights controlling traffic for all arrivals and departures. This beast came within a gnat's c**k of creating some much larger headlines. I would suggest that someone, somewhere has dropped the ball a little from a risk assessment perspective. No doubt that will now be rectified - both here and elsewhere - albeit I suggest the cost and inconvenience of implementing traffic control measures might be undersireable given a simpler, more obvious and cost-free solution.
I don't think I have ever known it to be used for something that has no intention of leaving the ground but might smash through the perimeter fence! To be honest, if that is necessary then it is difficult to see that the operation was ever a good idea.
Does the ploughed field normally have crops? If so, would they have operated had there been standing corn? If so and the same had happened it would presumably have caught fire!
YS
I used to work at an airfield which had both 'on airfield' traffic lights plus another set outside the airport and both were set to red for all takeoffs and landings.
Sycamore, I would hazard a reasonable guess that the auw for this "exercise" would be about 108 -109 k. (going from my old op. manual).
Thought police antagonist
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Where I always have been...firmly in the real world
Posts: 1,371
Received 99 Likes
on
70 Posts
There's an interesting video on YT entitled Recovering Vulcan XM655 At Wellesbourne Airfield...it's about 20+mins long. I can't post a link because I'm a little uncertain as to copyright......however, there are some very "interesting " sub titles and commentary....."Green Flag " get a mention, as does...gas pipe...the weight is stated as 50 tons and those on board "get mentioned "...
So why all the earth works in front of the aeroplane?
Luckily they didn’t have a strop snap during the pull. Otherwise there might well have been more than a Vulcan in the dirt. Idiots!