Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Misc. Forums > Aviation History and Nostalgia
Reload this Page >

British Airways TriStar 500.

Wikiposts
Search
Aviation History and Nostalgia Whether working in aviation, retired, wannabee or just plain fascinated this forum welcomes all with a love of flight.

British Airways TriStar 500.

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 17th Apr 2022, 14:15
  #21 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: britain
Posts: 680
Received 7 Likes on 7 Posts
Rog747. The Eastern Tristar was still with BA in 1980 that's when it visited Jersey
It was a dry lease
bean is offline  
Old 17th Apr 2022, 14:17
  #22 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2017
Location: Farnborough
Posts: 117
Received 10 Likes on 6 Posts
Originally Posted by treadigraph
I think it's one of those tech log engineering jokes that went round years ago. I remember a whole load recounted in Pilot 20 or 30 years ago, though whether that was amongst them I don't recall.
Well remembered, it was indeed amongst them. As was this:

Problem: Evidence of leak on right main landing gear.
Solution: Evidence removed.
SimonPaddo is offline  
Old 17th Apr 2022, 14:25
  #23 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: britain
Posts: 680
Received 7 Likes on 7 Posts
Originally Posted by treadigraph
I think it's one of those tech log engineering jokes that went round years ago. I remember a whole load recounted in Pilot 20 or 30 years ago, though whether that was amongst them I don't recall.
You are correct. The autoland story is a myth. An aircraft needs autoflare to autoland. If the story were to be correct at the very least the aircraft would have sustained severe damage
bean is offline  
Old 17th Apr 2022, 16:38
  #24 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: uk
Posts: 777
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The way I heard of the Brize heavy landing of a Tristar was that the aircraft was, in fact fitted with autoland facility, but that it was a rushed circuit which failed to give the autopilot the required time to stabilise and this resulted in the very firm landing which was indeed an autoland! ( or more correctly, attempted autoland! )
Meikleour is offline  
Old 21st Apr 2022, 00:53
  #25 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: London
Age: 42
Posts: 1,560
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by DaveReidUK
The -500 suffered, like most downsized aircraft variants, from relatively poor economics. That may have had something to do with its short career at BA.
It was, like the B747SP, built for long range but soon overtaken by more modern aircraft. The rationale for offloading them was that Lord King's remit was to get BA ready to be privatised and they were desperately short of cash. The B707s and VC10s had followed the Viscount fleet into retirement, 2 new build B747-236Bs were sold before delivery to Malaysian and G-KILO was flogged off to Cathay. A further two B747-136s, G-AWNI/K went to TWA and BA were delighted to offload the TriStar 500s to the RAF. BA were a hugely lossmaking and dysfunctional org back in the day.
Skipness One Foxtrot is offline  
Old 21st Apr 2022, 08:51
  #26 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Wildest Surrey
Age: 75
Posts: 10,813
Received 94 Likes on 67 Posts
Originally Posted by Skipness One Foxtrot
BA were a hugely lossmaking and dysfunctional org back in the day.
So what else is different?
chevvron is offline  
Old 21st Apr 2022, 20:38
  #27 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Cheshire, California, Geneva, and Paris
Age: 67
Posts: 867
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I seem to remember that having sold the long-range Tristar 500s British Airways acquired some South American routes from British Caledonian for which the Tristar 500s were ideal had they not already sold them. They flew the new routes with the shorter range Tristars and we at Heathrow ATC regularly received Diversion Arrival signals from Madrid as they had had to divert to refuel.
DC10RealMan is offline  
Old 22nd Apr 2022, 07:06
  #28 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: LEEDS
Posts: 1,258
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
Originally Posted by DC10RealMan
I seem to remember that having sold the long-range Tristar 500s British Airways acquired some South American routes from British Caledonian for which the Tristar 500s were ideal had they not already sold them. They flew the new routes with the shorter range Tristars and we at Heathrow ATC regularly received Diversion Arrival signals from Madrid as they had had to divert to refuel.
This is likely what prompted the lease of the pair from Air Lanka.
Mooncrest is offline  
Old 23rd Apr 2022, 14:40
  #29 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: UK
Posts: 1,681
Likes: 0
Received 129 Likes on 82 Posts
Meikleour - essentially correct.
The 'rushed circuit' gave too short a 'finals' to allow the mandated distance to establish. The resultant 'hunting'(What's it doing now'?) was the sircraft performing 'what it said on the tin' ! Super aircraft, DLC was excellent and the autoland was exceptional. It was the first type I tech instructed on at Cranebank and held a small, but definite preference over the subsequent 747 - Classic and 400. The flight deck was 'Texan sized' and the flight deck observer's seat was perfect. Chatting to the Fleet manager he reminisced on a double LHR- CDG one day where the only time he saw the ground was taxying in and out at either end !
Cornish Jack is online now  
Old 25th Apr 2022, 03:39
  #30 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Wildest Surrey
Age: 75
Posts: 10,813
Received 94 Likes on 67 Posts
Originally Posted by Cornish Jack
Classic and 400. The flight deck was 'Texan sized' and the flight deck observer's seat was perfect.
My first Tristar was 'inadvertant'; I'd been offloaded (ATCO Famil Flight) in Milan (by Alitalia) and managed to get to Paris Orly and transferred to CDG/Heathrow for a one way trip. As you say the jump seat behind the captain was superb with a lull length window right next to me.
My next Famil flight was Heathrow O/I Larnaca with that superb view all the way.
As we shut down at Heathrow, the door opened and in came the purser with a tray of drinks for us; a mniature of whisky topped up with champoo; perfect end to a great flight.
chevvron is offline  
Old 25th Apr 2022, 19:14
  #31 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 1999
Location: Quite near 'An aerodrome somewhere in England'
Posts: 26,795
Received 270 Likes on 109 Posts
Cornish Jack, also the RW08 ILS (as it was then) had a glideslope which undulated due to local terrain. It was OK to fly manually down to 200' a.g.l., but not auto-coupled.

ILS not suitable for auto-coupled apps to Cat I DH.
is still stated for the RW07 (as it now is) ILS!
BEagle is offline  
Old 26th Apr 2022, 10:41
  #32 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: London UK
Posts: 7,648
Likes: 0
Received 18 Likes on 15 Posts
Originally Posted by DC10RealMan
I seem to remember that having sold the long-range Tristar 500s British Airways acquired some South American routes from British Caledonian for which the Tristar 500s were ideal had they not already sold them. They flew the new routes with the shorter range Tristars and we at Heathrow ATC regularly received Diversion Arrival signals from Madrid as they had had to divert to refuel.
The -500s were delivered in 1979-80, just as the Thatcher government came in with goals to improve efficiency, and then privatise the airline. There were a number of poor performing long haul operations, often multi-stop, and once the 707s and VC-10s were disposed the -500, being by then the smallest long-haul aircraft in the fleet, tended to operate these, so they were sold off in 1983 to the RAF. Meanwhile, a parallel government initiative was to shore up B Cal, so BA services to Saudi (profitable) and B Cal services to South America (marginal) were swapped in 1985, and BA leased a couple of -500s from Air Lanka for several years to run these.

The order to Lockheed was for six -500s and eight -200s, the latter being the latest and most capable of the standatd bodied Tristars, having essentially the -500 engines etc in a full length frame. These didn't last much longer, being withdrawn after about 10 years, with the reductions at the start of the first Gulf war in 1991. A couple then returned the compliment to Air Lanka, and were leased out to them for a while, continuing to turn up most days at Heathrow.
WHBM is offline  
Old 28th Apr 2022, 19:59
  #33 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: London
Age: 42
Posts: 1,560
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The -200s having only 10 years in service is surprising, especially given the -1s flew on for another decade with Caledonian. Such a shame, as BA had nothing between the B747 and B767 at LHR for five years til the first B777 arrived, and they flew for 25 years or more.
Skipness One Foxtrot is offline  
Old 6th May 2022, 20:20
  #34 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: N . Daarset
Age: 71
Posts: 314
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Beagle , thanks for letting us know the ILS state . We'd heard that it was an offset Loc. And thus we'd never a/landed off that , but senior RAF decided to test it , with heavy landing following .
If memory serves the Eastern lease was N304EA ..... always heard about the 'Ghost of Flt 401' , which a 'gurlfriend said appeared on several night flights ... due to galley equipment having been salvaged from Flt 401 , N310EA...............Mind you 'wot happened in the underfloor galley stayed in U/F galley !
It was the U/F galley which kept -1 [ only G-BBAJ , not beefed up due her overun at LBA ] ,-50s ,-100s in service wirh Ba Airtours and Cale ....... 393Y + babes in arms , and 16 Flt 'n CC ..got my personal best SOBs well past 400 . The -200s had no U/F galley and thus max seats well reduced ; possibly no increase in max. ldg. wt. which could affect payload . Nominally , if replacing a Cale DC10 , we had 40 + more seats .... M.86 , gas 'n go in Santa Maria , we'd be in the Carribean before you ...
Others have explained the financial need to sell very well .
They were 25+ years old when I got to fly them , wonderful analogue machines . Brilliant wing , well less than 210 kts clean - 375kts VMO.. MMO brain fade but up towards M0.89 , 400+ SOB , 1 tonne spares pack in the hold .. go 7 hrs , gas 'n go another 7 hrs , land by a beach somewhere ....
Not to mention the hotel bedroom which was the flt deck , the window ledge behind and to the left of P1 seat converted readily into a perfect bunk for our 3 year old J/Seating home . When not asleep , he was having more fun than our village playground ... racing up and down in the lift with 'Bootful Blonde Tracey.
Even us flt. deck did not get to do that ! Engineers year or not .

rgds condor .
condor17 is offline  
Old 6th May 2022, 22:39
  #35 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: London UK
Posts: 7,648
Likes: 0
Received 18 Likes on 15 Posts
Originally Posted by condor17
..Mind you 'wot happened in the underfloor galley stayed in U/F galley ... They were 25+ years old when I got to fly them
I never observed the underfloor galley, apparently accessed by the catering cart elevator. What provision was there for a breakdown of it ?

I'm guessing you were on the Caledonian Tristar fleet by the end. I recall their very last flight, although I wasn't on board. It was Sunday 31 October 1999, end of the schools half term week, and end of the summer holiday schedule. We were returning from Faro to Gatwick late afternoon, on a Sabre 737. At Faro there was a Caledonian Tristar, also for Gatwick, stuck AOG which had apparently been there since late morning. This was the very last day of the Tristar fleet, they were to be withdrawn then. I wonder if the handling agent had disposed of their common spares a little early. Anyway, we boarded our own flight on time. When we got to Gatwick the Tristar was still on the arrivals board as awaiting information, possibly they were waiting for something to be flown out.

Next morning, back to the office. About lunchtime in comes the chairman, looking uncharacteristically jaded. "Rotten end to our week away. Plane broke down at Faro on the way home, it was 12 hours late, didn't get in to Gatwick until well into the early hours. Just stuck in Faro airport departures. Kids completely restless".

Thank God we didn't run into them ! I've sometimes wondered if the aircraft paperwork had also been set to expire on 31 October as planned, and a ramp check on arrival might have shown a little discrepancy ...
WHBM is offline  
Old 7th May 2022, 06:23
  #36 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Reading, UK
Posts: 15,810
Received 199 Likes on 92 Posts
Originally Posted by WHBM
I never observed the underfloor galley, apparently accessed by the catering cart elevator. What provision was there for a breakdown of it ?
Motor failures were rare, but IIRC in extremis (a F/A trapped down there, for example) the elevator could be moved up or down by hand by inserting a brace handle in the appropriate hole and winding it about a million times.
DaveReidUK is offline  
Old 7th May 2022, 08:00
  #37 (permalink)  

Gentleman Aviator
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: Teetering Towers - somewhere in the Shires
Age: 74
Posts: 3,696
Received 49 Likes on 23 Posts
inserting a brace handle in the appropriate hole and winding it about a million times.
Sounds a bit like the Puma manual gear extension (of old?)

Questions for current Puma chaps/chapesses:

1. Is it still the same on the new improved Puma?

2. If so, remind me how many pumps of the lever required.
teeteringhead is offline  
Old 7th May 2022, 10:35
  #38 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Wildest Surrey
Age: 75
Posts: 10,813
Received 94 Likes on 67 Posts
Originally Posted by teeteringhead
Sounds a bit like the Puma manual gear extension (of old?)

Questions for current Puma chaps/chapesses:

1. Is it still the same on the new improved Puma?

2. If so, remind me how many pumps of the lever required.
Sheesh now you tell me.
Years ago when I flew left hand seat in XW 941 from Farnborough, I was handed the FRCs and told 'you have been briefed on the emergency undercarriage lowering system haven't you (wink wink)?'
chevvron is offline  
Old 7th May 2022, 12:11
  #39 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Northumberland
Posts: 8,526
Received 81 Likes on 56 Posts
Originally Posted by DaveReidUK
Motor failures were rare, but IIRC in extremis (a F/A trapped down there, for example) the elevator could be moved up or down by hand by inserting a brace handle in the appropriate hole and winding it about a million times.
Apologies for the thread drift but did Lakers DC-10's have something similar, or am I making that up???
SWBKCB is online now  
Old 7th May 2022, 13:36
  #40 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: near an airplane
Posts: 2,789
Received 50 Likes on 41 Posts
There certainly were DC-10s with an underfloor galley, but I'm not sure whether Laker's DC-10s were part of that batch.
Jhieminga is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.