Comet 4 and Caravelle - common pilot type rating ?
Thread Starter
Comet 4 and Caravelle - common pilot type rating ?
Obviously this question is purely academic but would a common type rating have been probable, if not impossible? My basic point of view regards the Caravelle as essentially a twin-engine, short-body Comet with the same fuselage cross-section and, most importantly, a virtually identical cockpit. At the very least a pilot would need to have to undertaken a differences course, bearing in mind the different number of engines, engine mounting and tail designs giving differing handling characteristics.
Disclaimer: I am not a pilot and I don't design cockpits or whole aeroplanes so I'd particularly welcome more professional observations than I can provide! Thankyou.
Disclaimer: I am not a pilot and I don't design cockpits or whole aeroplanes so I'd particularly welcome more professional observations than I can provide! Thankyou.
Last edited by Mooncrest; 2nd Oct 2020 at 05:19.
Nigh impossible. Apart from the different systems, different engines and different flying characteristics, it would also need a level of cooperation between UK and French authorities that was not there (yet). Also, keep in mind that it was the front fuselage that was similar, so structure and glazing, not the insides.
My understanding is that the co-operation was there, the stub wing for the BAC 1-11 engines came from Sud-Aviation. I was told it was the same design as the Caravelle.
That's co-operation between two manufacturers, which is also what led to the similarity between the front end of the Caravelle and the Comet. What I meant was co-operation between the certifying authorities of the UK and France, as you would need the French CAA signing off on a type rating for an aircraft that had not been type certificated by them, and may not have been flown by them. Vice versa for the UK providing a Caravelle rating on a UK licence based on a Comet rating. It's an interesting idea, but from a flight characteristics and cockpit layout perspective, as well as from a legal perspective, it was not possible in those days.
Thread Starter
I'm inclined to agree. Although the 757 and 767 have different systems their cockpits are virtually identical and are the same design of aircraft, albeit different fuselage widths. Plus they have the advantage of coming from the same manufacturer and a significant customer base for both types, two things that didn't apply to either the Comet or Caravelle.
Thread Starter
Let's just accept that "common type ratings" were pretty well unknown to manufacturers such as de Havilland and Sud Aviation which were breaking new ground with their jet-propelled airliners. Sud's use of the Comet nose must have been a shortcut to save "re-inventing the wheel" and, as pointed out above, was structure and glazing but not contents.
AF didn't fly the Comet but one of the saddest sights ! remember seeing in the old Rhodes airport (the one surrounded by hills) was an old AF poster showing a Comet in AF colours.
Alas - what might have been!
Alas - what might have been!
OK so how did Boeing get away with it for the 757/767?
No airlines it seems, except MEA & AEROLINEAS ARGENTINAS flew both Comets and Caravelles at the same time in the 1960s'.
Air France had Comet 1's in service, along with UAT (TAI/UTA) until the grounding in 1954.
They then both operated new Caravelles when first introduced about 5 or so years later.
The Caravelle cockpit and RR Avon engines were part of the Comet 4 legacy.
Old RHO airport was Maritsa behind the hills....
Air France had Comet 1's in service, along with UAT (TAI/UTA) until the grounding in 1954.
They then both operated new Caravelles when first introduced about 5 or so years later.
The Caravelle cockpit and RR Avon engines were part of the Comet 4 legacy.
Old RHO airport was Maritsa behind the hills....
Join Date: Mar 1999
Posts: 264
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Only when you sat down did the suble differences become apparant. ( different flap settings and fuel dump on the 76 IIRC)
That said the bogie angle on the 76 was opposite the 75 which was a doddle to land smoothly, on the 76 you took what you got !
Both quite brilliant aircraft, delightful to fly and operate, but never did manage to fly a 76 and 75 on the same day!
Last edited by RetiredBA/BY; 2nd Oct 2020 at 17:48.
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Never You Mind
Posts: 94
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I am fairly sure the Comet and Caravelle cockpit (that is the physical structure) were exactly the same. As for a common type rating... back then no chance but if they were flying today, probably. Look at the 330/350, they have some similarities but they are not anything like the same aircraft but a DIY quick course and some regulatory smoke and mirrors you can fly both under a common type rating.
I'm absolutely certain that I've read somewhere that the Comet nose design was licenced by Sud-Aviation from de Havilland for the Caravelle so I would expect it to be identical. I've always assumed it was external, and presumably structure, rather than anything more.