Name that Flying Machine
Looks like a rather neat picture - so I'd guess post-1960?
Did they build very many???
Ah - looking through names of US small aircraft I came across the "Merkle" - Wiki has it as the " The Merkel Mark II is an American homebuilt aerobatic biplane that was designed by Edwin Merkel and produced by the Merkel Airplane Company of Wichita, Kansas in the form of plans for amateur construction.[size=8333px] [/size]Designer Merkel died on 12 March 2012 and plans are apparently no longer available. The Mark II features a two-seats-in-tandem open cockpit with an optional bubble canopy, fixed conventional landing gear and a single engine in tractor configuration. The Mark II was intended as a two-seat trainer version as a companion to a planned single-seat competition version.[size=8333px] [/size]The aircraft is made from welded steel tubing with the airframe covered in sheet aluminum. Its 25.5 ft (7.8 m) span wings employ a NACA 23012 airfoil and each has a single torsional spar. The standard engine recommended was a 220 hp (164 kW) Franklin Engine Company powerplant.[size=8333px] [/size]The aircraft has an empty weight of 1,200 lb (540 kg) and a gross weight of 1,540 lb (700 kg), giving a useful load of 340 lb (150 kg). With full fuel of 18 U.S. gallons (68 L; 15 imp gal) the payload is 232 lb (105 kg)
Don't see no bubble canopy and you say it has a Walter/Avia but I suspect that this is it? I can't see any other of that era named after a European statesman or woman (tho the idea of the Texas "THATCHER" is an interesting flight of fancy.........
Don't see no bubble canopy and you say it has a Walter/Avia but I suspect that this is it? I can't see any other of that era named after a European statesman or woman (tho the idea of the Texas "THATCHER" is an interesting flight of fancy.........
That was not easy! The problem is of course that with kit builds people change the design a bit - which makes identification that much more challenging - but it does take us on roads we wouldn't normally travel
Have to be OH I'm afraid
Have to be OH I'm afraid
Aviation journalist Roger Bacon interviewing an Atlantic Baron; "Tell me Captain, why do you only fly in four-engined airplanes?"
Captain Speaking: "Because there are no five-engined airplanes, laddie!"
RB: "Well, actually there are!"
This should be easier than the last challenge.
Captain Speaking: "Because there are no five-engined airplanes, laddie!"
RB: "Well, actually there are!"
This should be easier than the last challenge.
CoodaShooda has it - the Zeppelin-Staaken R.XIVa
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Zeppelin-Staaken_R.XIV
138' wingspan! Adjusting the wing incidence must have been fun.
Open House has been declared.
... a fifth Maybach engine was installed in the nose.
138' wingspan! Adjusting the wing incidence must have been fun.
Open House has been declared.
Last edited by India Four Two; 11th Dec 2020 at 05:04.
100 fitters and BIG megaphone?
Join Date: May 2011
Location: France
Posts: 153
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I know I'm getting a little older with the occasional lapse in short-term memory but I could swear there was a post in this thread about the Bréguet 763 Deux-Ponts. Now I can't find it even using the search function. What happened to it ?
After looking at some cockpit pix, I was going to ask about the crew make up.
After looking at some cockpit pix, I was going to ask about the crew make up.
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Auckland, NZ
Age: 79
Posts: 722
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I do not recall the Deux Ponts challenge but We have had contributors who deleted their own challenge after it was solved. But then the replies should still be visible...
Anyway you have at least a possible subject for a future challenge.
As it is open house:
This made my somewhat dormant shipbuilding heart beat faster:
Beautiful craftsmanship in teak and mahogany.
If that would be built today Greenpeace would be screaming out loud.
(and rightfully so).
Anyway you have at least a possible subject for a future challenge.
As it is open house:
This made my somewhat dormant shipbuilding heart beat faster:
Beautiful craftsmanship in teak and mahogany.
If that would be built today Greenpeace would be screaming out loud.
(and rightfully so).
No not Italian.
You can see all the wood strips pointing towards the same point. That makes it almost a developable surface like a cone. Took me back to my schooldays in bachelor engineering Shipbuilding.
You can see all the wood strips pointing towards the same point. That makes it almost a developable surface like a cone. Took me back to my schooldays in bachelor engineering Shipbuilding.
Last edited by Self loading bear; 16th Dec 2020 at 21:25.
