Lancaster/Other Bomber Crews Age
Thread Starter
Lancaster/Other Bomber Crews Age
I think the Lancaster had the lowest mission fatality rate of any British bomber, somewhere in the region of 5% never returned*, so 1 in 20 was lost on a mission, at a 1942 cost of 42,000 for the airframe, and with all factors included such as training around 120,000 (again at 1942 rates) total.
What did surprise me is that many crews consisted of men (or should I say boys) aged 20 or under, that is the entire crew, for long-range trips over Germany. Such responsibility as such an age cannot be overestimated, although it is surprising that the vast majority of the aircrew were so young.
My question is, although aptitude was of course important, why were Bomber crews averaging out at age 21, surely many older men would have volunteered and that average age be somewhat beyond that mark.
*I believe other bombers had attrition rates of up to 15% on long-range missions.
What did surprise me is that many crews consisted of men (or should I say boys) aged 20 or under, that is the entire crew, for long-range trips over Germany. Such responsibility as such an age cannot be overestimated, although it is surprising that the vast majority of the aircrew were so young.
My question is, although aptitude was of course important, why were Bomber crews averaging out at age 21, surely many older men would have volunteered and that average age be somewhat beyond that mark.
*I believe other bombers had attrition rates of up to 15% on long-range missions.
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: North of Watford, South of Watford Gap
Age: 68
Posts: 251
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes
on
1 Post
I'm not sure of the casualty rate for aircraft, but more crewmembers from Halifaxes survived (29%) than Lancaster crews (11%) - the Halifax had a bigger escape hatch in the nose, which most of the crew would have used. "The low rate for Lancasters was thought to be due to the fact that it was more difficult to move about in this narrow aircraft to the small forward compartment and to the poor rear escape hatch. It was also thought possible that the Lancaster was more liable to break up in the air and that the higher flight conditions might increase the difficulties of escape after the removal of the oxygen masks." (Operational Research in the RAF, (HMSO, 1963) p.66)
The average age became lower because many of the older men were pre-war regulars, many of whom were lost earlier in the war. Their replacements were mostly young men in their late teens, keen to fly and arguably more able to learn their trades quickly than those at the upper end of the age range.
The average age became lower because many of the older men were pre-war regulars, many of whom were lost earlier in the war. Their replacements were mostly young men in their late teens, keen to fly and arguably more able to learn their trades quickly than those at the upper end of the age range.
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Cheshire, California, Geneva, and Paris
Age: 67
Posts: 867
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I had a friend who was a member of an RAF Bomber Command crew and his fellow crew members called him "Dad" because he was 25 years of age with a wife and family.
He explained that he was more circumspect about taking on the risks involved because of his family commitments whereas his fellow crewmembers, not one of whom was over 21 knew that they were going to survive because at that age they were invincible. One day as they approached the end of their first tour of thirty flights they were accosted by Hamish Mahaddie, one of Don Bennetts "Horse Thieves" who suggested that they may wish to join the RAF Bomber Command Pathfinders and stay on operations and complete a tour of 60 flights before being "rested" because they got an extra 5p a day and an enamel Pathfinder badge to show the girls down the pub. Most of his young crewmates were very keen but he suggested that they take their weeks leave before coming to a decision, after they returned from the leave the subject was never mentioned again and they survived to be old men I am glad to say.
My friend did say that if his younger crewmates had insisted on joining the Pathfinders he would have gone with them knowing that in the winter of 1943 and the Battle of Berlin it was a virtual death sentence.
He explained that he was more circumspect about taking on the risks involved because of his family commitments whereas his fellow crewmembers, not one of whom was over 21 knew that they were going to survive because at that age they were invincible. One day as they approached the end of their first tour of thirty flights they were accosted by Hamish Mahaddie, one of Don Bennetts "Horse Thieves" who suggested that they may wish to join the RAF Bomber Command Pathfinders and stay on operations and complete a tour of 60 flights before being "rested" because they got an extra 5p a day and an enamel Pathfinder badge to show the girls down the pub. Most of his young crewmates were very keen but he suggested that they take their weeks leave before coming to a decision, after they returned from the leave the subject was never mentioned again and they survived to be old men I am glad to say.
My friend did say that if his younger crewmates had insisted on joining the Pathfinders he would have gone with them knowing that in the winter of 1943 and the Battle of Berlin it was a virtual death sentence.
Overall Lanc loss rates on ops were around 45% of all aircraft built, that doesn’t include training losses. Some aircrew lost their lives at 18 and I believe even 17. One Bomber Command pilot was 15. His father seeing a picture of him being presented to the King, promptly phoned the air ministry to ask what he was doing there.
Thread Starter
I should say I picked up this knowledge from Len Deighton's "Bomber" which I found to be an absolutely incredible work, for its approach from all sides of the equation. Anyone thinking of ever waging war in my opinion should read this book, fiction it might be (although the stats I believe are meticulously researched, and are what I have quoted) but for the sheer scope of humanity it manages to encompass and its observational nuances I found it to be an absolute masterpiece.
The War planners analysis pre-mission on what type of bombs the Lancs should use was chilling.
The War planners analysis pre-mission on what type of bombs the Lancs should use was chilling.
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: United Kingdom
Posts: 274
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Flash 8 wrote “I think the Lancaster had the lowest mission fatality rate of any British bomber, somewhere in the region of 5% never returned*, so 1 in 20 was lost on a mission, at a 1942 cost of 42,000 for the airframe,
I was always under the impression that a Spitfire during the war cost £5,000 and a Lancaster £22,000.
I was always under the impression that a Spitfire during the war cost £5,000 and a Lancaster £22,000.
Thread Starter
Only quoting here from Deighton's "Bomber" but of course may very well be incorrect:
As a side note I was once taught by an elderly schoolmaster whose job he said during the war was to go around with a dustpan and brush and "sweep out" the bombers.... it was only many years later I understood fully what his meaning was, it was the way he said it and how his eyes glazed over that made it stick in my mind.
In cash, at 1943 prices with profits pared to a minimum, each Lancaster cost £42,000. Crew-training averaged out at £10,000 each, at that time more than enough to send the entire crew to Oxford or Cambridge for three years. Add another £13,000 for bombs, fuel, servicing and ground-crew training at bargain prices and each bomber was a public investment of £120,000.
As a side note I was once taught by an elderly schoolmaster whose job he said during the war was to go around with a dustpan and brush and "sweep out" the bombers.... it was only many years later I understood fully what his meaning was, it was the way he said it and how his eyes glazed over that made it stick in my mind.
Of course Mosquito losses bomber wise were much lower. As Innominate says Lancs did not have a very good escape record. Freeman Dyson estimated 10,000 bomber aircrew lost their lives as the escape hatch was too small.
Last edited by rolling20; 8th Aug 2018 at 21:42.
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: North of Watford, South of Watford Gap
Age: 68
Posts: 251
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes
on
1 Post
The figure of £5,000 for a Spitfire was a nominal target for the organisers of "Spitfire Funds" to raise. The MAP agreed prices with manufacturers for each batch of aircraft, although these were for the bare airframe and didn't include engines, guns, radios etc. That might explain the disparity between the figures of £22,000 and £42,000 for a Lancaster - unless one is a misprit! I found a note among Harris's papers at Hendon, giving a breakdown of costs (such as £2500 for an engine, £45 for a Browning and £355 for an 8000lb bomb) but not a cost for the bare airframe or complete aircraft.
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: London
Posts: 7,072
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
my old boss was a navigator on Mossie bombers.. he reckoned no-one ever thought they'd get out....... door was tiny,in full airflow and right next to the prop
My question is, although aptitude was of course important, why were Bomber crews averaging out at age 21, surely many older men would have volunteered and that average age be somewhat beyond that mark.
While flying and later in Stalag Luft 3 he was usually addressed as Grandpa, and he told me he often felt like one among the 18 - 21 year-olds he was with, while he was married with 2 children.
Last edited by old,not bold; 10th Aug 2018 at 10:47.
Thread Starter
I had a friend who was a member of an RAF Bomber Command crew and his fellow crew members called him "Dad" because he was 25 years of age with a wife and family.
He explained that he was more circumspect about taking on the risks involved because of his family commitments whereas his fellow crewmembers
He explained that he was more circumspect about taking on the risks involved because of his family commitments whereas his fellow crewmembers
I guess they had far more volunteers than spaces, and far less volunteers aged past the mid 20's, in those days marriage was usual by the early 20's? Many may have had young families.
Perhaps there was also an Aircrew cut-off age of course, but all of this combined conspired against those a little older.
the chance of surviving an ordinary tour of 30 missions unharmed was only 24%.
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Beyond the Blue Horizon
Age: 63
Posts: 1,257
Received 151 Likes
on
94 Posts
Flash 8
My late Fathers Halifax crew had an "older" Canadian skipper (24) but the rest of them were under 21, and in my Fathers case 18 yrs 6 months when shot down. The skipper was nicknamed "Granddad" by his young crew. Unfortunately both he and 3 others did not survive being shot down. My Dads 21st Birthday was spent watching the bombing of Hamlin while eating raw potatoes in a field while on the run after escaping from a POW column. As you say it is amazing what these young men did. As for "Bomber" I totally agree with you , a terrific book well researched and according to my Father a very accurate portrayal of what it was like, to both being in a bomber and being bombed. He experienced the latter courtesy of the 8th Air force and Bomber Command, and also had his column strafed by roving US fighter bombers on numerous occasions in 1945, the latter causing many fatalities and injury to POW,s.
Regards
Mr Mac .
My late Fathers Halifax crew had an "older" Canadian skipper (24) but the rest of them were under 21, and in my Fathers case 18 yrs 6 months when shot down. The skipper was nicknamed "Granddad" by his young crew. Unfortunately both he and 3 others did not survive being shot down. My Dads 21st Birthday was spent watching the bombing of Hamlin while eating raw potatoes in a field while on the run after escaping from a POW column. As you say it is amazing what these young men did. As for "Bomber" I totally agree with you , a terrific book well researched and according to my Father a very accurate portrayal of what it was like, to both being in a bomber and being bombed. He experienced the latter courtesy of the 8th Air force and Bomber Command, and also had his column strafed by roving US fighter bombers on numerous occasions in 1945, the latter causing many fatalities and injury to POW,s.
Regards
Mr Mac .
Following on from flash8's posts, I'd like to add a small ditty.
My late father was one of the earliest recruits to the Air training Corps here in East Anglia. He and his mates were very keen to be air gunners. As part of their cadet training, they were often taken up to RAF Horsham St Faiths (now Norwich International Airport). Although it was mainly a fighter station, from time to time RAF Bombers would drop in after raids for fuel and other assistance. One day, whilst working on the station, they saw a bomber parked up near the tower. One cadet asked the chiefy looking after them, if they could go and have a look inside the turrets, being keen prospective gunners.
"Not just yet, son" quoth Chiefy, "They're still hosing the gunner out at the moment"
Dad's mate turned round to him and whispered " Sod being a gunner,Jack, let's go for radio operator...."
My late father was one of the earliest recruits to the Air training Corps here in East Anglia. He and his mates were very keen to be air gunners. As part of their cadet training, they were often taken up to RAF Horsham St Faiths (now Norwich International Airport). Although it was mainly a fighter station, from time to time RAF Bombers would drop in after raids for fuel and other assistance. One day, whilst working on the station, they saw a bomber parked up near the tower. One cadet asked the chiefy looking after them, if they could go and have a look inside the turrets, being keen prospective gunners.
"Not just yet, son" quoth Chiefy, "They're still hosing the gunner out at the moment"
Dad's mate turned round to him and whispered " Sod being a gunner,Jack, let's go for radio operator...."
Thought police antagonist
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Where I always have been...firmly in the real world
Posts: 1,371
Received 110 Likes
on
77 Posts
As an aside, how long would it take for a crew to complete the full 30 ops, or would this be dependent on type, Sqdn, and time of year ?..or all three.
There were lots and lots of young men flying in Lancasters, but the oldest crew members (not very many) were usually gunners (and in their 40's).
To give context, the Lancaster was a horrible bomber to get out of. On average only one in 7 crew got out when it was shot down (8 crew in the Pathfinders-and extra navigator).
So with about 3400 lost and an average of 6 crew lost per loss, then you can see the Lancaster casualty rate would be very high.
To give context, the Lancaster was a horrible bomber to get out of. On average only one in 7 crew got out when it was shot down (8 crew in the Pathfinders-and extra navigator).
So with about 3400 lost and an average of 6 crew lost per loss, then you can see the Lancaster casualty rate would be very high.
Guest
Posts: n/a
The simple answer was: "Old men make wars, young men have to fight them". When I joined (in late '40), the age limits for aircrew were 17½ - 23. Nearly all the prewar "short service" and General List people were killed early on: the RAF fought the war with boys born in the five years between 1919 and 1923.
After the huge contraction in 1946 - 49, it was left with: "a much smaller cake - but the same mix". It would be the mid to late '60s before all the "old wartime hairies" were phased out.
When I came back in '49, I shared a room with a nice young Cranwellian. He told me that the opinion of the Directing Staff there was: "We'll do no good with this Air Force till we get rid of all these old wartime people". Hope it wasn't true !
After the huge contraction in 1946 - 49, it was left with: "a much smaller cake - but the same mix". It would be the mid to late '60s before all the "old wartime hairies" were phased out.
When I came back in '49, I shared a room with a nice young Cranwellian. He told me that the opinion of the Directing Staff there was: "We'll do no good with this Air Force till we get rid of all these old wartime people". Hope it wasn't true !
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Lancasters: would it not have been possible for the whole or part "greenhouse" on top to be made jettisonable ? Never had anything to do with them myself, but I understand the front spar was a major obstacle when you needed to get out fast in full flying kit.
Any "techies" like to come in on this ?
Any "techies" like to come in on this ?