Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Misc. Forums > Aviation History and Nostalgia
Reload this Page >

British aircraft by profitability

Wikiposts
Search
Aviation History and Nostalgia Whether working in aviation, retired, wannabee or just plain fascinated this forum welcomes all with a love of flight.

British aircraft by profitability

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 9th Feb 2018, 09:55
  #21 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: on a blue balloon
Posts: 2
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
kenparry:

"He said that the more airframes they sold, the more money the company lost - they were going for below cost"

Taking the nonrecurring development cost as already sunk, one would have to be exceptionally incompetent to sell for less than the recurring cost to build.
oldchina is offline  
Old 9th Feb 2018, 10:08
  #22 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: London
Posts: 7,072
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
"Many/most manufacturers of complete aircraft have suffered financial pain"

Douglas, Convair, Lockheed, Bristol, Sud-Aviation, HP, Northrop, Westland, Canadair................

just recently Boeing, Airbus, HAL, Dassault, Westland..............

name one that HASN'T had financial issues at one time
Heathrow Harry is offline  
Old 9th Feb 2018, 10:35
  #23 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: UK
Posts: 1,120
Received 9 Likes on 8 Posts
Obviously having asked the question I don't have an immediate answer - thinking that there maybe existing knowledge out there. Many responses seem to indicate that the data however would be in some way secret but I'm not so sure.

The list price for any aircraft must be broadly known and even if it wasn't at the time I can hardly see why the price of a (say) Vickers Viscount would be kept secret in 2018. Development costs for any project seem to be widely known for many military projects (I'm thinking for example TSR2). I'd have thought this subject of cost v revenues would have had an airing by now but perhaps not.
Pittsextra is offline  
Old 9th Feb 2018, 10:37
  #24 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: se england
Posts: 1,579
Likes: 0
Received 48 Likes on 21 Posts
Rushing to judgement on my part about it being only airliners hence choosing just the the Viscount with the 1-11 146 doing sort of ok and so i must apologise for the 748 omission especially as it always looked a neat business like aircraft and it had decent longevity.

Aircraft manufacturing is as history has demonstrated a risky business to say the least and it is a shame that such incredible engineering and technical skills could seldom earn the rewards they deserve for skill and perseverance .

and it seems yet another consolidation is taking place with boring and AB snapping up ther much smaller rivals to ensure they have a complete range of aircraft from 70 odd to over 400 seats each
pax britanica is offline  
Old 9th Feb 2018, 10:44
  #25 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: London
Posts: 7,072
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Pitts

your problem is who is going to publish the info on Viscount prices in 60 years ago?

You can Google it or you can electronically crawl through "Flight" or similar but you really need the accounts of the sellers - and they have probably been shredded these 30 years
Heathrow Harry is offline  
Old 9th Feb 2018, 10:48
  #26 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2017
Location: RPVI
Posts: 70
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Anyone have a notion how the Scottish Aviation Bulldog and BAe Jetstream 31 programmes faired?
DANbudgieman is offline  
Old 9th Feb 2018, 12:15
  #27 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: on a blue balloon
Posts: 2
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Pittsextra:
I think you are not wasting your time following the Viscount route.
I remember reading that the plan was to price the first 1-11s the same as the last Viscounts. The latter was said to be (but not verified by me) £800000. I can try to find the quote. That would give you a 55 year old price point for prices in pounds Sterling.
You said you're looking to check profitability. Using list prices will obviously overstate profits by such an enormous margin as to make any result meaningless.
Just in case you're not aware, Airbus and Boeing do post current sticker prices on their websites.
oldchina is offline  
Old 9th Feb 2018, 12:57
  #28 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Brighton
Posts: 968
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
Taking the nonrecurring development cost as already sunk, one would have to be exceptionally incompetent to sell for less than the recurring cost to build.
I don't have the story on how the sums were done or how the quoted result was arrived at. Your claim might well be true.
kenparry is offline  
Old 9th Feb 2018, 19:57
  #29 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Dorset UK
Age: 70
Posts: 1,895
Likes: 0
Received 15 Likes on 12 Posts
Around about 1972 a BAC 1-11 was $2,200,000.
My father, as Flight Shed Senior Inspector, was handing over a new 500srs. to Philippine Airlines one Sunday and was given the cheque for the payment as nobody from the Commercial dept. was working at the weekend. He brought it home and showed it to me.

Just thinking though, there may have been a deposit paid earlier so the total price may be higher.
dixi188 is offline  
Old 10th Feb 2018, 07:18
  #30 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: UK
Posts: 1,120
Received 9 Likes on 8 Posts
The Turboprop World-Beater VISCOUNT

Almost at the very end of that page is this:-

By the time Vickers ceased production of the type in 1964, a total of 444 had been sold to 50 major airlines, with a value, including spares, of £177 million, export sales accounting for £147 million.
So £177m in sales just need to find out how much it cost to design/develop and that would be a starter for ten!
Pittsextra is offline  
Old 10th Feb 2018, 07:56
  #31 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Hertfordshire
Posts: 517
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Yes but where did the author get the numbers from? They may be right but how do we know?
We used to be bedevilled by people who believed what they read in books ("it's in print so it must be true") or even in newpapers, but now we have the internet in all its uncontrolled splendour!
Allan Lupton is offline  
Old 10th Feb 2018, 08:23
  #32 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: on a blue balloon
Posts: 2
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Allan. We used to be bedevilled by people who believed what they read in books.
Bedevilled? That was your trade, brochuremanship !
oldchina is offline  
Old 10th Feb 2018, 09:27
  #33 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 1999
Location: Hyeres, France
Posts: 1
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by VictorGolf
I was told that product support for the B.Ae 146/RJ series was profitable if not the airframes themselves. But as you say that would depend on how they do the accouinting.

Just back from FNAC with a couple of printer Ink Cartridges.

Now I know where Hewlett Packard got the idea from....
Hussar 54 is offline  
Old 10th Feb 2018, 09:46
  #34 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: UK
Posts: 1,120
Received 9 Likes on 8 Posts
Originally Posted by Allan Lupton
Yes but where did the author get the numbers from? They may be right but how do we know?
We used to be bedevilled by people who believed what they read in books ("it's in print so it must be true") or even in newpapers, but now we have the internet in all its uncontrolled splendour!
Yes I take your point but lets put this in context.

First off this was just a "thinking out loud" type question... "Oh I wonder what the most "profitable" aircraft were"...

Then I guess one takes the numbers in good faith unless someone suggests otherwise.

Ultimately it is just a bit of fun but I am surprised that nobody has ever really looked at this before.
Pittsextra is offline  
Old 10th Feb 2018, 14:17
  #35 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: England
Posts: 1,077
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Spitfire must have made a few bob for Vickers?
ZeBedie is offline  
Old 10th Feb 2018, 15:00
  #36 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: London
Posts: 7,072
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
"Ultimately it is just a bit of fun but I am surprised that nobody has ever really looked at this before."

I suspect there are a few PhD studies out there but probably people started and got so depressed they just gave up
Heathrow Harry is offline  
Old 10th Feb 2018, 15:02
  #37 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: London
Posts: 7,072
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
https://www.flightglobal.com/news/ar...dustry-211152/

is a grim retelling of how we arrived here

https://books.google.co.uk/books?id=...bility&f=false

lists a lot of historic articles
Heathrow Harry is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.