Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Misc. Forums > Aviation History and Nostalgia
Reload this Page >

BA 747 Pilot Reminisces

Wikiposts
Search
Aviation History and Nostalgia Whether working in aviation, retired, wannabee or just plain fascinated this forum welcomes all with a love of flight.

BA 747 Pilot Reminisces

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 15th Oct 2017, 20:11
  #21 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Great Southern Land
Age: 72
Posts: 511
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I’ve flown 737s, 767s and 747s. The 767 was a fun sports car but I have to to say the 747 was my favourite, especially the 400 which was just a gentleman’s aircraft, I really didn’t mind the large fuel tanks as they made it possible to fly to interesting destinations!
I have also flown the F27 and never associated it with the early 747s, perhaps I was too happy flying the big jet to notice.
Offchocks is offline  
Old 15th Oct 2017, 20:47
  #22 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Brisbane
Posts: 573
Received 69 Likes on 17 Posts
Ah yes, the 'Queen' a lovely aeroplane but I also found the cockpit very cramped with a relatively poor view, although you could see your wing-tip which helped on the ground. A very easy aeroplane to land. I only ever had one 'thumper' in 15 years of flying it. Landing on 04R at JFK I said to my young Co-Pilot, "Don't play with it Mr Ong Wing Loh this runway is shortish, just put it down". Will never say that again. Feeling that it was a heavy landing I was about to write it up when the Ground Engineer pulled the data via the ACARS and it was only 1.5G and 'within limits'. Surprising seeing there was no flare.
When comparing previous types, for some strange reason I go way back to my GA days and the 747 feels like a giant Aztec. The 727, my favourite, flies like an Aerostar with the wings sawn-off.
By George is offline  
Old 17th Oct 2017, 22:43
  #23 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: UK
Posts: 1,683
Likes: 0
Received 140 Likes on 89 Posts
Airclues, yes, you're correct - it was fin height for the upper disc. My 'handling' was all 'sim' time and took a little longer to settle with than the REAL 'Queen', the Tristar. Once adapted, though, it 'felt right' but nothing beats the observer's seat in the Tri!!
Cornish Jack is offline  
Old 18th Oct 2017, 07:24
  #24 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: with the other ex-CX pond scum (a zoologist was once head of Flight Ops)
Posts: 1,852
Received 50 Likes on 21 Posts
Jump seat 1 in the A350 is pretty good too. Up there with the TriStar.

Fond memories of the Jumbo, apart from the cramped and noisy flight deck. An absolute pussycat to land. The aircraft truly 'shrank the world', and it stands as an invention apart from the aeroplane in my opinion.

Last edited by Captain Dart; 18th Oct 2017 at 21:44.
Captain Dart is online now  
Old 18th Oct 2017, 09:11
  #25 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: UK.
Posts: 4,390
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by Cornish Jack
Airclues, yes, you're correct - it was fin height for the upper disc. My 'handling' was all 'sim' time and took a little longer to settle with than the REAL 'Queen', the Tristar. Once adapted, though, it 'felt right' but nothing beats the observer's seat in the Tri!!
TriStar was my first big jet and the learning curve was vertical. I'd have found the Classic more intuitive.
Basil is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.