Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Misc. Forums > Aviation History and Nostalgia
Reload this Page >

BAe ATP. What was wrong with it?

Wikiposts
Search
Aviation History and Nostalgia Whether working in aviation, retired, wannabee or just plain fascinated this forum welcomes all with a love of flight.

BAe ATP. What was wrong with it?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 25th May 2017, 05:33
  #121 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: London UK
Posts: 7,651
Likes: 0
Received 18 Likes on 15 Posts
Originally Posted by Skipness One Echo
No ATP built at PIK ever entered service, 2063 was built at WFD, the last ATP built. 2064 and 2065 were built as J61s with uprated engines and both were scrapped.
It's, inevitably, a bit more complicated than that, as the fuselages for the last ATP, and those two J61s, were all manufactured at Woodford and then trucked up to Prestwick for final assembly. As I understand it the last ATP and the first J61 had this done in 1992, the ATP was completed there and flown in May 1993, before the final Woodford-built ones, while it was another year before the sole J61 to be completed flew. As they were both then taken back to Woodford for further work, the whole exercise seems to have been somewhat futile.
WHBM is offline  
Old 25th May 2017, 14:42
  #122 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: London (Babylon-on-Thames)
Age: 42
Posts: 6,168
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
That's not correct, as I said, the last ATP, 2063 was assembled at and flown from Woodford. I was Prestwick based at the time, believe me not much else was happening in 1992/93.
Skipness One Echo is offline  
Old 25th May 2017, 15:54
  #123 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Reading, UK
Posts: 15,816
Received 201 Likes on 93 Posts
Originally Posted by WHBM
while it was another year before the sole J61 to be completed flew
Both J61s flew, presumably in a substantially completed state.
DaveReidUK is online now  
Old 26th May 2017, 18:52
  #124 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: alton
Age: 71
Posts: 133
Likes: 0
Received 10 Likes on 5 Posts
Originally Posted by WHBM
It's, inevitably, a bit more complicated than that, as the fuselages for the last ATP, and those two J61s, were all manufactured at Woodford and then trucked up to Prestwick for final assembly. As I understand it the last ATP and the first J61 had this done in 1992, the ATP was completed there and flown in May 1993, before the final Woodford-built ones, while it was another year before the sole J61 to be completed flew. As they were both then taken back to Woodford for further work, the whole exercise seems to have been somewhat futile.
At the start of production ATP fuselages were built at Chadderton and moved by lorry overnight to Woodford, I always assumed this was how it was done for them all.

Richard
sandringham1 is offline  
Old 26th May 2017, 20:53
  #125 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: scotland
Posts: 183
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 1 Post
The first flight of 2064 with the registration G-JLXI was on 10 May 1994. Subsequently this aircraft went on to get certification for the J 61 (with ATP Set 1) and flew at Farnborough. It had wacky writing down the side trying to show turbulence giving way to smooth flight. This aircraft and ATP Set 1 (G-MATP and then G-PLXI) were the mainstay of the J61 programme and both contributed to the J 61 certification. Set 65 only flew a few times and my only flight would seem to be in Jan 96. There was some flying after this but the programme seemed to stop dead. Anyone know when the J61 programme stopped?
CharlieJuliet is offline  
Old 26th May 2017, 21:22
  #126 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: York
Age: 53
Posts: 797
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Could any fill me in on how the J61 differed from the ATP
Mickey Kaye is offline  
Old 26th May 2017, 21:32
  #127 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Reading, UK
Posts: 15,816
Received 201 Likes on 93 Posts
Originally Posted by Mickey Kaye
Could any fill me in on how the J61 differed from the ATP
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/British_Aerospace_ATP

Incidentally, the J61 is/was actually certificated (by the CAA only) as the "Jetstream Series 6100 Model 6102".
DaveReidUK is online now  
Old 30th Jun 2017, 11:14
  #128 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2017
Location: RPVI
Posts: 70
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
With the wonderous advantage of 20/20 hindsight I cannot but wonder if the thread would better have been titled "What was right with the ATP?"

There again, that would most certainly have made for a very short thread.
I suspect that it would have struggled to make one line!
DANbudgieman is offline  
Old 1st Jul 2017, 09:12
  #129 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2015
Location: Netherlands
Posts: 249
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Is it me, or can I no longer see the pictures on the forum? All I can see is a dial saying "100%. Please update your account etc." What do I need to update?? Please help.
washoutt is offline  
Old 1st Jul 2017, 09:14
  #130 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2015
Location: Netherlands
Posts: 249
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
For some reason, I can no longer see the pictures on the forum. All I can see is a dial saying "100%, Please update your account" What account do I need to update? Please help.
Further, I cannot send messages shorter tha 100 characters, so I will repeat this text to make sure I pass the criterium.
Weird.
washoutt is offline  
Old 1st Jul 2017, 09:42
  #131 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Wildest Surrey
Age: 75
Posts: 10,813
Received 95 Likes on 68 Posts
Originally Posted by washoutt
Is it me, or can I no longer see the pictures on the forum? All I can see is a dial saying "100%. Please update your account etc." What do I need to update?? Please help.
It's due to a sudden demand for money by Photobucket that has hit other forums too eg Home | Blackbushe Airport - The one-stop Forum
Apparently Photobucket want to charge you for attaching even your own photos to these forums.
chevvron is offline  
Old 2nd Jul 2017, 08:59
  #132 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2015
Location: Netherlands
Posts: 249
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Aha, so vote with your feet, as it were. No more Photobucket
washoutt is offline  
Old 2nd Jul 2017, 11:26
  #133 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Auckland, NZ
Age: 79
Posts: 722
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Seeing photos

With ref to longer ron's post: if you right click on the broken image icon, you're offered "Copy image address." Take this, open a new window, post the address into the address bar (Ctrl-V) and Bingo! you see the picture.

This is with Chrome on Windows 10, but the mechanism looks fairly generic. Not an ideal procedure, but something until the problems are worked out.

Edit: this also works with the non-appearing Photobuggered images.

Last edited by FlightlessParrot; 2nd Jul 2017 at 11:33. Reason: New information.
FlightlessParrot is offline  
Old 5th Jul 2017, 08:32
  #134 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Westnoreastsouth
Posts: 1,826
Received 32 Likes on 28 Posts
Just to replace the link/image broken by the photobucket ransom fiasco

Whilst on a recent holiday in the Azores,walking on Sao Jorge Island,we walked up to the peak of Pico da Esperanca (1053 m).
Lovely walk but we knew it would take us past the very sad memorial to the worst ATP accident .
11 December 1999, ,SATA, Air Açores,CS-TGM

longer ron is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.