Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Misc. Forums > Aviation History and Nostalgia
Reload this Page >

The Vanguard - why was it not?

Wikiposts
Search
Aviation History and Nostalgia Whether working in aviation, retired, wannabee or just plain fascinated this forum welcomes all with a love of flight.

The Vanguard - why was it not?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 12th Jan 2016, 13:11
  #21 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 1999
Location: England
Age: 76
Posts: 1,196
Likes: 0
Received 28 Likes on 16 Posts
I've questioned elsewhere why the Vanguard was so noisy
Much of the noise derived from the compressors for the cabin pressurisation, driven by engines 2 & 3. IIRC On the Merchantman only eng 3 drove a compressor which theoretically should have meant less noise but I don't recall whether this occurred in practice.

Like the Trident, the Vanguard was over-complex engineering-wise. For example, the props, engine intakes and tail leading edges were anti-iced electrically, the engines internally by bleed air and the wing leading edges by hot air generated by heat exchangers taking in ambient air and warming it using exhaust gases.

Ditto the Trident: converting from the T-bird on to the 737 we were surprised to learn that, in contrast to the highly complex anti-icing system on the former's tail surfaces, the tail of the Boeing was not anti-iced at all.

Last edited by Discorde; 12th Jan 2016 at 13:22.
Discorde is offline  
Old 12th Jan 2016, 13:17
  #22 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Kerry Eire
Age: 76
Posts: 609
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Having had a good number of Vanguard flights between Manchester and London in the 1960s ("Student" standby fare one way for under 23s was £2/10/6d) I would confirm a good number of the points raised. The vibration seemed to travel down the roof from front to rear in waves, particularly in the climb. At one stage, around 1963, there was a period when the engines were desynchronised at the top of climb and the aircraft seemed to hang in the air. The rear cabin was certainly the place to head for in the period of unallocated seats, unless moderate turbulence was on the menu.

As for noise on the ground, Vanguards taxying at Manchester were regularly heard in Heaton Moor, Stockport, around 6.5 miles as the Vanguard flew.
philbky is offline  
Old 12th Jan 2016, 20:19
  #23 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2014
Location: 40nm east of BLL
Posts: 151
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
VHBM wrote:
I've always blamed the (De Havilland) square-ended props, as opposed to the (Dowty) rounded ones on the Britannia
Studys of wind turbine noise have revealed that radial curved 'spade like' wingtips are more silent :-/
Flybiker7000 is offline  
Old 12th Jan 2016, 21:52
  #24 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Timbukthree
Posts: 13
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
"...more silent"? Do you mean "less noisy" ? That said, the Vanguard was a qualified success for Trans Canada Airlines, especially on the high-density Toronto-Ottawa-Montreal corridor. The "Mudguard" was a good stop-gap while awaiting the DC-9. Air Canada's selection of the DC-9 also offered a few aerospace jobs, as some DC-9 components were built in Canada, something no British-built jetliner could offer.
evansb is offline  
Old 13th Jan 2016, 05:16
  #25 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Nirvana South
Posts: 734
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
IIRC the TCA Vanguards also suffered from leaking toilets that caused some corrosion. When I joined the BAC Design Office at Hurn, one of the structural engineers' claim to fame was that he'd done the on-site repair schemes.
ICT_SLB is offline  
Old 13th Jan 2016, 06:33
  #26 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Reading, UK
Posts: 15,817
Received 201 Likes on 93 Posts
Originally Posted by ICT_SLB
IIRC the TCA Vanguards also suffered from leaking toilets that caused some corrosion.
That was also the likely cause of the loss of a BEA Vanguard in 1971, where corrosion led to rupture of the rear pressure bulkhead.
DaveReidUK is online now  
Old 13th Jan 2016, 08:17
  #27 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 1998
Location: London, UK
Posts: 1,992
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
As for noise on the ground, Vanguards taxying at Manchester were regularly heard in Heaton Moor, Stockport, around 6.5 miles as the Vanguard flew.
The Electra was pretty noisy as well. Regularly heard them taxying at Bournemouth from over 4 miles away. Even today can sometimes hear the ATP.
Groundloop is offline  
Old 13th Jan 2016, 08:35
  #28 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: London
Age: 42
Posts: 1,566
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
On school nights I well remember the AK650 out of GLA-EMA going over the house some 20+ miles from GLA, it was a very distinctive and rare sound by the 90s.
Skipness One Foxtrot is offline  
Old 13th Jan 2016, 14:32
  #29 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: 11 GROUP
Age: 77
Posts: 1,346
Likes: 0
Received 79 Likes on 27 Posts
Engine issues

I seem to recall that in addition to all said before there were issues with the RR Tyne engine and that was just 'another' issue too many for it to be a Viscount replacement;as the new 'Jets' had more sales appeal.
Having said that i do not know if it was ever even considered as a UK 'Orion'.
I suspect the engine issues were the straw they did not need.
Its all in 'Trubbs' book. I forgot it also had some unpleasant stalling issues and was not considered to handle like the Viscount.
POBJOY is offline  
Old 13th Jan 2016, 17:29
  #30 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Reading, UK
Posts: 15,817
Received 201 Likes on 93 Posts
Originally Posted by POBJOY
Having said that i do not know if it was ever even considered as a UK 'Orion'.
I suspect the engine issues were the straw they did not need.
Though that didn't stop the French and Germans powering both their MPA and tactical transport fleets with the Tyne.

Its all in 'Trubbs' book.
What book is that, out of interest?
DaveReidUK is online now  
Old 13th Jan 2016, 18:42
  #31 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Too close to EASA
Posts: 408
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The Tyne certainly wasn't reliable compared to modern turboprops. In my time at AirBridge (avionics engineer), I think we normally managed at best 1100-1200 hours on the wing between shop visits - and that meant sending them to MTU in Germany as Rolls Royce had transferred design and support to them.
wigglyamp is offline  
Old 13th Jan 2016, 21:36
  #32 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: 11 GROUP
Age: 77
Posts: 1,346
Likes: 0
Received 79 Likes on 27 Posts
Trubshaw Book

The book is Brian Trubshaw Test Pilot

A very good read and covers most of the major 'Vickers' aircraft and of course Concorde.
He pulls no punches on the machines and is quite outspoken on the various 'problems' encountered.
His reports on the Valiant, BAC111 and VC10 are comprehensive,and the account of the Vanguard certification meeting with the ARB quite entertaining.

The Tyne engine gave problems from the start and no doubt RR were pleased to pass it on.
POBJOY is offline  
Old 19th Jan 2016, 15:00
  #33 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Timbukthree
Posts: 13
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
...yet the Ilyushin IL-18 was widely exported and is considered one of the most durable and successful Soviet-era airliners.

In the mid-1980's, I was a passenger on a Holquin to Havana Cubana IL-18 flight. It was comfortable, roomy and reasonably fast.
evansb is offline  
Old 19th Jan 2016, 18:46
  #34 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Manchester MAN
Posts: 6,643
Received 74 Likes on 46 Posts
It was comfortable, roomy and reasonably fast.
...and made smoke like a B-52! I used to see one belonging to Vietnam Airlines back in the 90s.
India Four Two is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.