Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Misc. Forums > Aviation History and Nostalgia
Reload this Page >

Flying the DC3 in severe turbulence

Wikiposts
Search
Aviation History and Nostalgia Whether working in aviation, retired, wannabee or just plain fascinated this forum welcomes all with a love of flight.

Flying the DC3 in severe turbulence

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 7th Oct 2012, 04:27
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Australia
Posts: 1,414
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Flying the DC3 in severe turbulence

During my time flying civilian DC3's in Australia decades ago,it was common practice for pilots would lower the landing gear if they encountered severe turbulence, in order to fly at a reduced speed. Pilots Notes for RAAF Dakotas gave no advice on severe turbulence penetration.

Does anyone know why the landing gear was lowered to help reduced speed when a lower power setting would have achieved the same result? I recall the gear down technique was widely known and practiced but the manufacturer did not mention this technique specifically.

Once in severe turbulence and if the speed got real low, the gear was retracted. Can anyone cast any light on why the gear down was used in turbulence?

Last edited by A37575; 7th Oct 2012 at 04:30.
A37575 is offline  
Old 7th Oct 2012, 07:12
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 1999
Location: Quite near 'An aerodrome somewhere in England'
Posts: 26,806
Received 270 Likes on 109 Posts
Perhaps the lowered main undercarriage added some pendulous roll stability?
BEagle is online now  
Old 7th Oct 2012, 07:23
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: uk
Posts: 1,775
Received 19 Likes on 10 Posts
I have read something about Avro York pilots lowering the u/c and flaps in massive updraughts. This allows them to control the speed without reducing the power too much and over cooling the engines. I think it was Nesbit Duforth(?) who used to write splendid articles in Pilot magazine.

In one of his articles he describes an experience when he was still climbing with full flap, u/c down and the engine power reduced as much as he dared.
pulse1 is offline  
Old 7th Oct 2012, 09:17
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Northamptonshire
Posts: 1,457
Received 17 Likes on 7 Posts
pulse1,

Could this be John Nesbitt-Dufort DSO, a distinguished special duties pilot with 138 Sqn at Tempsford?

Old Duffer
Old-Duffer is offline  
Old 7th Oct 2012, 10:29
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: France
Age: 80
Posts: 6,379
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Wasn't N-D the sqn cdr of 138 at one time. One of the other pilots was (later AVM Sir) Alan Boxer, one of the Trustees at the Yacht Club of which I was Secretary for several years - an outstanding officer and gentleman
Wander00 is offline  
Old 7th Oct 2012, 10:43
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: England
Posts: 1,955
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Increasing parasite drag and, as a consequence, total drag has the effect of moving the total drag curve (up and left on the speed/drag graph) to increase speed stability, or maintain speed stability at a lower speed. Useful in turbulence.

That's my guess.
Lord Spandex Masher is offline  
Old 7th Oct 2012, 16:18
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 1999
Location: UK
Posts: 3,325
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I guess they did it to increase drag so there's less chance of overspeeding the aeroplane in the speed excursions severe turbulence brings (even if you ignore the ups and downs and maintin the correct attitude as you should, there'll be times you won't be able to maintian attitude in very rough air and the speed could go beyond Vne if the aeroplane was left 'clean').
Shaggy Sheep Driver is offline  
Old 7th Oct 2012, 20:55
  #8 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: UK
Posts: 1,683
Likes: 0
Received 140 Likes on 89 Posts
Pulse1 - sounds like the episode recounted by one of the early post WW2 captains flying York freighters out of Lebanon. Fully loaded he entered the base of an active Cb at 6000' and hit up-draughting of such violence that, even with gear and flaps down and engines at idle, they still went up and were eventually spat out of the side at (IIRC) 26000'!!! Stay clear of the 'thunder-bumpers'!!
Cornish Jack is offline  
Old 12th Oct 2012, 10:34
  #9 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Australia
Posts: 1,414
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Many safety publications advise lowering the gear for speed control.
. Many thanks for the info Bryan A. While I haven't seen any safety publication articles covering the subject I am sure there are around as you say. The trouble with these you have to be sure they are published facts and not the authors' personal opinions. I have been guilty of the latter on a few occasions
A37575 is offline  
Old 14th Oct 2012, 01:51
  #10 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Great Southern Land
Age: 72
Posts: 511
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
In my youth I did about 500hrs on DC3s in Europe and can't recall this procedure of lowering the gear. Thirty seven years on my first thoughts would be fine if you have increasing IAS but what if you have rapid reducing IAS, with the gear down you have less excess power to overcome the IAS loss. The DC3s I flew did not have much excess power.
This is all assuming you can read the instruments which is almost impossible in "severe" turbulance.

Last edited by Offchocks; 14th Oct 2012 at 01:54.
Offchocks is offline  
Old 14th Oct 2012, 10:02
  #11 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Asia
Posts: 12
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Questionable Procedure:

This suggested procedure of lowering the gear in severe turbulence just has to be dreamed up nonsense. I flew DC3s for 11 years with two reputable airlines and there was nothing in their operating manuals about this. Why should there be ? Increasing the pendulum affect in turbulence is the last thing any pilot would want.
Also I just happen to have a reprint of the DC3/C47 flight manual issued by the USAF dated 15 March 1963. On page 9-4 of the section dealing with " Flight in Turbulence and Thunderstorms " there is the enlarged word " CAUTION " and following on from this is " Do not lower the flaps or gear since structural damage may occur " Doubt if there is anything more definitive than that.

James.
James Leite is offline  
Old 14th Oct 2012, 13:50
  #12 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: CYZV
Age: 77
Posts: 1,256
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
If I may expound a little on James' post:

APPROACHING STORM:

1...Disengage the autopilot.
2...Reduce airspeed as required.
3...Mixture controls - AUTO-RICH
4...Propellor Controls - 2350 RPM
5...Pitot heater switch - ON
6...Carburetor heat - As required
7...Throttles - As required
8...Check the power source and gyro-stabilized instrument settings.
9...Safety belts and shoulder harnesses - Tightened
10...Turn off any radio equipment rendered useless by ststic.
11...Turn the cockpit lights full bright to minimize the blinding effect of lightning.

CAUTION:

Do not lower the flaps or gear, since structural damage may occur.

Last edited by pigboat; 14th Oct 2012 at 13:52.
pigboat is offline  
Old 15th Oct 2012, 02:58
  #13 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Great Southern Land
Age: 72
Posts: 511
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Perhaps lowering the gear on DC3s for extreme turbulence was a local procedure in Australia. Speculation I know, but it could have come about because some crews had flown types that recommended it and thought it a good idea.
Offchocks is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.