Vulcan incident Doncaster 28th May
Thread Starter
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Near Finningley
Age: 67
Posts: 36
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
XH558 aborted take-off
XH558 was due to fly a practise display today but has just suffered an aborted take-off. Witnesses report two bangs and smoke coming from two engines.
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Texas and UK
Age: 66
Posts: 2,886
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Vulcan incident Doncaster 28th May
After an incredible amount of effort and fund raising to get the Vulcan XH558 back in the air this year, it suffered an engine explosion at Doncaster earlier today. The damage is serious but no one has been hurt. The airport was closed for several hours. A video of the incident was taken by a Pprune member who is an instructor at Doncaster, with luck we will be able to see that on the news later.
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Blighty
Posts: 35
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Engine Failure Update
Quote from VTTST's website home page:
"XH558 was scheduled to take off at noon on May 28th for a crew currency and display training flight. Just after the start of the take-off roll, she experienced problems with two of her Olympus engines. The crew immediately shut all engines down and everyone is safe. At this stage, we don't have any further information but we will keep supporters informed via Twitter (@XH558), Facebook (Vulcan XH558) and the news section (here) of the charity's website (www.vulcantothesky.org).
Unfortunately, this means that she will not be able to fly for at least two weeks, although we will not know exactly how long rectification will take until the problem has been thoroughly investigated.
We will provide further updates when we know more."
"XH558 was scheduled to take off at noon on May 28th for a crew currency and display training flight. Just after the start of the take-off roll, she experienced problems with two of her Olympus engines. The crew immediately shut all engines down and everyone is safe. At this stage, we don't have any further information but we will keep supporters informed via Twitter (@XH558), Facebook (Vulcan XH558) and the news section (here) of the charity's website (www.vulcantothesky.org).
Unfortunately, this means that she will not be able to fly for at least two weeks, although we will not know exactly how long rectification will take until the problem has been thoroughly investigated.
We will provide further updates when we know more."
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Bridport
Age: 49
Posts: 81
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Oh that's really sad news. I was really looking forward to hearing / feeling a Vulcan flying again as I have great memories of seeing her at Farnborough when I was a nipper. Glad nobody was hurt.
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Germany
Age: 67
Posts: 1,777
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From the VTTS website...
The failure occurred in the two port side engines (1 & 2) on the ground as the aircraft was easing towards full power at the start of her take-off roll. She is now back in her hangar where the technical team will investigate the problem. Our initial thought is that the symptoms are very much like those experienced when something is ingested by an engine so we will be investigating all possible sources. We would like to thank Robin Hood Airport Doncaster Sheffield (RHADS) for their immediate assistance and professionalism yesterday.
We will provide further updates when we know more.
We will provide further updates when we know more.
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Stamford
Age: 50
Posts: 20
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I read somewhere there are a couple of spare engines, however I also read somewhere the airframe is due to expire serviceability next year, can anyone clear up the rumours?
I read somewhere there are a couple of spare engines, however I also read somewhere the airframe is due to expire serviceability next year, can anyone clear up the rumours?
I'm sure you are right about the airframe though.
Serious questions will need to be asked about the Vulcans future. I think the long suffering volunteers have paid out more than enough over the years to see this beautiful aircraft fly again and maybe it's time to say bye bye Vulcan?
Ich bin ein Prooner.
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Home of the Full Monty.
Posts: 511
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Instead of spending/wasting vast amounts of money on this a/c why not get NX 611( Lancaster) flying again ??
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Sussex
Posts: 225
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
...Serious questions will need to be asked about the Vulcans future. I think the long suffering volunteers have paid out more than enough over the years to see this beautiful aircraft fly again and maybe it's time to say bye bye Vulcan?
Other aircraft projects are welcome to go canvassing for money but to say that the money should be given to something to something else is palpable nonsense.
When you are told what charities you may or may not support that is tax.
Long may Doctor Plemming and his excellent team keep up the good work.
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: UK
Posts: 143
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
No disrespect whatsoever to anyone connected with XH558, but this incident may well have the making of being an expensive repair, and this aircraft does swallow huge amounts of money, so maybe safe and sound as a static exhibit now?
Join Date: Oct 1999
Location: UK
Posts: 3,325
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I'm not sure there's much point in XH558 flying at all. She is limited by the rules under which she flys in the power used and the 'G' pulled compared to those limits in RAF service, therefore the displays are a shadow of those back in the day, when the aeroplane was in service.
This is no reflection on those who fly her; they have no choice but to abide by the rules.
The result is, a lot of folk who are not old enough to remember a real Vulcan display have watched a post-RAF 558 one and are under the impression that they have seen a Vulcan display.
They haven't! Not a balls-out real one!
This is no reflection on those who fly her; they have no choice but to abide by the rules.
The result is, a lot of folk who are not old enough to remember a real Vulcan display have watched a post-RAF 558 one and are under the impression that they have seen a Vulcan display.
They haven't! Not a balls-out real one!
The displays you see 558 flying nowadays are far more graceful than the ridiculous, wing-waggling nonsense flown by the apple-spitting gibbon in the latter days of the VDF.....
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: 28°52'02"N
Posts: 107
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I don't agree SSD. For four years in the 1970s, from outside my extraordinarily well-guarded office on the other side of the A17, I often used to stare up the jet pipes of the displaying Vulcan. I've felt the wingtip vortices as it flew low over the mound I stood on. I watched Joe LeStrange skim the airfield at less than half span. I've stood on the ORP watching 16 ship scrambles. However, in the crowd at Farnborough a couple of years ago, I didn't feel I was missing out. Instead I was thrilled to the marrow to hear, see and feel the World's most charismatic aircraft howling down the runway towards me then roaring its defiance into the sky.
Let's hope the damage is limited to a couple of fodded engines.
Let's hope the damage is limited to a couple of fodded engines.