T-33 prang at Duxford 6/9 - crew safe
Gnome de PPRuNe
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Too close to Croydon for comfort
Age: 60
Posts: 12,618
Received 293 Likes
on
161 Posts
T-33 prang at Duxford 6/9 - crew safe
BBC are reporting that a T-33 has crashed just west of Duxford; happily both crew have escaped from the wreck unharmed.
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/england/c...re/5320788.stm
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/england/c...re/5320788.stm
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: A25R
Posts: 171
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Rotated with a high angle of attack and never recovered, stalled into the field beyond the end of the westerly runway and caught fire. I think they were very lucky chaps to walk from that.
aceatco, retired
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: one airshow or another
Posts: 1,431
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
On the other hand, it does demonstrate the folly of building a service station adjacent to the airfield, doesn't it? Hmmm, double edged sword maybe. 
Glad the crew are OK.
Glad the crew are OK.
Last edited by vintage ATCO; 6th Sep 2006 at 19:46.
Join Date: Aug 1999
Location: Dublin, Ireland
Posts: 1,879
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Was this aircraft supposed in RCAF colours and supposed to be coming to Jersey to participate in the air display tomorrow?
Hope not, as a colleague won a raffle to fly in it (I came third!)
Hope not, as a colleague won a raffle to fly in it (I came third!)
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: over here
Posts: 472
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I'm afraid that's the one, Aeroskid....completely burnt out in the post-crash fire. Sorry for your friend, perhaps he will get a chance for something else.
Duxford was a very quiet place for a time this afternoon.
Duxford was a very quiet place for a time this afternoon.
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: ...back of the drag curve
Age: 61
Posts: 558
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I was just thinking how little this subject had been speculated on, but then got down as far as this:
Whilst I agree with everything from "field beyond the end of the westerly runway and caught fire", the rest is just idle chit chat
The crew are safe, nobody was killed, no property was damaged, so lets leave the causes to the experts shall we? For those that need clarifcation, experts = The AAIB
Rotated with a high angle of attack and never recovered, stalled into the field beyond the end of the westerly runway and caught fire
The crew are safe, nobody was killed, no property was damaged, so lets leave the causes to the experts shall we? For those that need clarifcation, experts = The AAIB
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: The Flatlands
Age: 60
Posts: 85
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
No Ejection Seat!
Anybody know how the crew are doing and what caused this hole in the ground?
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/england/c...re/5320788.stm
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/england/c...re/5320788.stm
Ecce Homo! Loquitur...
Bit more in the Cambridge Evening News. Both OK, justs some cuts.
Anybody know if it was Cliff Spink and G-TBRD?
Anybody know if it was Cliff Spink and G-TBRD?
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: The Flatlands
Age: 60
Posts: 85
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Totally agree. Looking at the press photo, it's amazing that anyone escaped alive, and is obviously testament to the flying skills of whoever was in the seat at the time. Reading the more in-depth report provided by the local rag (see earlier post), it seems Duxford has suffered a few accidents in the recent past. Bad luck or something more sinister?
Below the Glidepath - not correcting
There are two really uplifting pieces of news in the BBC article, firstly that both crew members are safe and well, and secondly, that 59 is regarded ad "middle aged".
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: London
Posts: 2,916
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Speculation 
It's so unfair when people are so quick to suggest pilot error at a time when no-one except the pilot could possibly know what caused a crash.
Just the sort of speculation for which we condemn journalists.
I feel particularly strongly about it in this instance because the pilot, Alan Walker, has been a good friend for many years.
Not only is he a highly respected aviator and a very experienced display pilot, he is also one of the nicest people on the display circuit. I have never, in all the years we've been friends, heard him say a bad word about anyone.
Another friend of mine was following 20 seconds behind in a stream take-off. He didn't speculate on the cause of the crash, even in a private conversation, saying it could have been a number of things, far too early to say etc - and he's got almost 4000 hours on fast jets.
I'm told the passenger (an engineer) cut his way out through the canopy, jettisoned it from the outside and bravely rescued Alan from the burning aircraft. It was a hard impact and a fire. Those who've seen the wreckage say it's nothing short of a miracle that anyone survived.
Let's just thank God that the two of them not only survived, but without serious injury.
Alan, who is a Captain with Cathay Pacific and regular contributor to this forum, was discharged from hospital today.
Tudor
It's so unfair when people are so quick to suggest pilot error at a time when no-one except the pilot could possibly know what caused a crash.
Just the sort of speculation for which we condemn journalists.
I feel particularly strongly about it in this instance because the pilot, Alan Walker, has been a good friend for many years.
Not only is he a highly respected aviator and a very experienced display pilot, he is also one of the nicest people on the display circuit. I have never, in all the years we've been friends, heard him say a bad word about anyone.
Another friend of mine was following 20 seconds behind in a stream take-off. He didn't speculate on the cause of the crash, even in a private conversation, saying it could have been a number of things, far too early to say etc - and he's got almost 4000 hours on fast jets.
I'm told the passenger (an engineer) cut his way out through the canopy, jettisoned it from the outside and bravely rescued Alan from the burning aircraft. It was a hard impact and a fire. Those who've seen the wreckage say it's nothing short of a miracle that anyone survived.
Let's just thank God that the two of them not only survived, but without serious injury.
Alan, who is a Captain with Cathay Pacific and regular contributor to this forum, was discharged from hospital today.
Tudor
Last edited by Flying Lawyer; 7th Sep 2006 at 22:49.
Wunderbra
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Bedford, UK
Age: 44
Posts: 313
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I am glad to hear that both occupants escaped relatively uninjured. Having looked at the pictures it is amazing to say the least! 
I think Duxford shows a high number of accidents purely due to the nature of aircraft flown from there.
You are dealing with aircraft types that do not benefit from all the bells and whistles of modern aircraft, and generally pretty long in the tooth. I would imagine that rixk of an accident increases with age of aircraft.
It would be interesting to see statistics for this.
You are dealing with aircraft types that do not benefit from all the bells and whistles of modern aircraft, and generally pretty long in the tooth. I would imagine that rixk of an accident increases with age of aircraft.
It would be interesting to see statistics for this.
Cunning Artificer
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: The spiritual home of DeHavilland
Age: 76
Posts: 3,127
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
There are two really uplifting pieces of news in the BBC article... ...that 59 is regarded as "middle aged".
Good news that the crew survived, but a sad end for a nice flying machine.
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Covering the Commonwealth
Posts: 549
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Mr Blake
it seems Duxford has suffered a few accidents in the recent past. Bad luck or something more sinister?
For the number of movements, it's probably a lower accident rate than a GA airport. It can't be 'sinister' as FULL DETAILS are available to anyone who cares to look.I think Duxford shows a high number of accidents purely due to the nature of aircraft flown from there.
You are dealing with aircraft types that do not benefit from all the bells and whistles of modern aircraft, and generally pretty long in the tooth. I would imagine that rixk of an accident increases with age of aircraft.
It would be interesting to see statistics for this.
You are dealing with aircraft types that do not benefit from all the bells and whistles of modern aircraft, and generally pretty long in the tooth. I would imagine that rixk of an accident increases with age of aircraft.
It would be interesting to see statistics for this.
Duxford is one of the WORLD'S most important active vintage aviation sites, with a greater amount of activity than anywhere else I can think of. If there's an airshow on anywhere in the UK it's almost inevitable that there will be departures and arrives, plus practices at DX.
Yes, the accidents at DX shouldn't have happened; however each and every one of them has been analysed in depth, and conclusions drawn, and the lessons learned and applied. Most (all?) of the reports are available to anyone who cares to investigate the AAIB website. In that sense Duxford's still safer than crossing the road, and not only more interesting, but the errors and problems better investigated and resolved than a road accident, and on occasion better than an air transport accident.
ALL the active aircraft at Duxford are better and more rigourously maintained than the airliner you'll fly on holidays in. They are in better condition than a Cessna 172 at your local flying club, and though older have less hours, cycles and bad landings etc. than that Cessna. The flying is far more tightly regulated and monitored, both self-policing and externally than and private flying and some airline flying. The public's REAL safety is on the highest priority at all times at the site.
We are bloody lucky to have such a global attraction and active historic site. Don't act like an anti-aviation illiterate tabloid journalist. Aircraft aren't dangerous; ignorance and thoughtlessness is.
Rant over.
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Mars
Posts: 15
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I vaugely remember a AAIB presentation that said something like
Airliner Accidents
1 in 1,000,000,000,000 sectors
GA
1 in 1,000,000
Ex-mil types (jets and props)
1 in 10,000
Gyrocopters
1 in 1
Numbers all made up by me as I cant remember the real stats but the ratios were something like that so hardly surprising that Duxford sees the odd incident. I guess its all part of the fun.
Airliner Accidents
1 in 1,000,000,000,000 sectors
GA
1 in 1,000,000
Ex-mil types (jets and props)
1 in 10,000
Gyrocopters
1 in 1
Numbers all made up by me as I cant remember the real stats but the ratios were something like that so hardly surprising that Duxford sees the odd incident. I guess its all part of the fun.
Do a Hover - it avoids G
Join Date: Oct 1999
Location: Chichester West Sussex UK
Age: 91
Posts: 2,206
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
matt hooks
You suggested that older aircraft are more likely to have accidents and received a one word comment of 'rubbish' from JDK.
There are three aspects that stem from the age of an aircraft. Age as in worn out or on last legs which as I am sure is unlikely to be a factor with loved and cherished aircraft - of which there are plenty at Duxford.
Then there is also the fact that older aeroplanes have more demanding handling characteristics because of the limited knowlege that existed when they were designed. This is normally compensated for by carefully selecting the crews - especially these days after one or two boobs in that area in the past.
Finally there is the inherently reduced level of reliability of components as designed decades ago. Again this is compensated for today by tighter maintenance procedures and the quality of the ground crew.
JF
You suggested that older aircraft are more likely to have accidents and received a one word comment of 'rubbish' from JDK.
There are three aspects that stem from the age of an aircraft. Age as in worn out or on last legs which as I am sure is unlikely to be a factor with loved and cherished aircraft - of which there are plenty at Duxford.
Then there is also the fact that older aeroplanes have more demanding handling characteristics because of the limited knowlege that existed when they were designed. This is normally compensated for by carefully selecting the crews - especially these days after one or two boobs in that area in the past.
Finally there is the inherently reduced level of reliability of components as designed decades ago. Again this is compensated for today by tighter maintenance procedures and the quality of the ground crew.
JF