Can you get it from the photograph? Even if I don't show the photograph?
I'matightbastard
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Texas
Posts: 1,747
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Can you get it from the photograph? Even if I don't show the photograph?
Russian
Single (rotary) Engine
Low Wing
Single Seat
"The Vertical surfaces seem to be just slightly out of proportion, too large for the rest of the aircraft, and to some this mars its beauty"
Single (rotary) Engine
Low Wing
Single Seat
"The Vertical surfaces seem to be just slightly out of proportion, too large for the rest of the aircraft, and to some this mars its beauty"
Sadly, history does not show any early Russian, low-winged single-seat, rotary powered aircraft...........
I'matightbastard
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Texas
Posts: 1,747
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Sorry, I'm an idiot. I meant a radial Doh!
ok then I'll give you another clue. It has a little scoop underneath smaller than, but similar to a P51.
ok then I'll give you another clue. It has a little scoop underneath smaller than, but similar to a P51.
A Polikarpov of some mark or other?
or then again how about a Yatsenko I-28?
Of course if you\'d said yugoslavian then it would have to be the Rogzarski IK-3 with its silly liitle tail and rudder...........wouldn\'t it?
Time to leave this I think
or then again how about a Yatsenko I-28?
Of course if you\'d said yugoslavian then it would have to be the Rogzarski IK-3 with its silly liitle tail and rudder...........wouldn\'t it?
Time to leave this I think
I'matightbastard
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Texas
Posts: 1,747
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I think you should get the point for providing an anogram of the manufacturer's name 
ok, I screwed it up anyway. Lavochkin La9
ok, I screwed it up anyway. Lavochkin La9
