VA and VARA integration
From an VA AFAP rep today, the AFAP(without member consultation again!) reached a preliminary agreement with the Company to allow the redundant F100 pilots to join the VA NB EBA with conditions of seniority still to be discussed.
They (VARA) will be simultaneously be on Leave Without Pay of their own EBA, while operating on the VA EBA until both agreements expire, at which time re- negotiations are expected to take place. |
What redundant f100 pilots?
|
Obviously a wind up, no way they could agree to something like that without member consultation
|
No wind up TimmyTee, Pack valve is pretty close to the mark.
All is about to be revealed, and the union membership will have some serious thinking to do. |
Not part of the VA group but why would the F100 pilots be being made redundant?
Aren’t the 737-700s coming a straight swap for the F100? |
I got a email from Virgin this week, some of our family intra Queensland flights early next year have had equipment change to all economy -700.
Looking further it appears they are basing a couple in BNE? Whole pile of routes moving to the 700. |
It’s definitely no wind up Timmy Tee - only reporting the facts! Which should soon come to light.
Seems that dumb pilots will continue to pay the AFAP to negotiate a pay cut and still accept zero consultation. |
Ok, I'm keen to hear how this could have been done better. Given the F100s are to be replaced by 737s, how would would YOU do it?
I'd be disappointed if I was about to get a F100 command. |
Originally Posted by Packvalve
(Post 11281262)
From an VA AFAP rep today, the AFAP(without member consultation again!) reached a preliminary agreement with the Company to allow the redundant F100 pilots to join the VA NB EBA with conditions of seniority still to be discussed.
They (VARA) will be simultaneously be on Leave Without Pay of their own EBA, while operating on the VA EBA until both agreements expire, at which time re- negotiations are expected to take place. |
Originally Posted by PoppaJo
(Post 11281862)
I got a email from Virgin this week, some of our family intra Queensland flights early next year have had equipment change to all economy -700.
Looking further it appears they are basing a couple in BNE? Whole pile of routes moving to the 700. |
It makes sense these 700’s will replace current Alliance flying on the east coast.You can’t get a seat to Newcastle out of BNE on those 100 seaters of Alliance.So let’s go to 144 seats.
|
Originally Posted by Biatch
(Post 11281938)
without member consultation?!? Oh please. What part of the word “Representatives” do you not understand. They have effected an outcome which is better than expected given the circumstances thrust onto the pilot body by the company. To expect them to come to a group vote every time they need to make a decision is ludicrous and impractical and you know it.
I only offered facts, but you’re suggesting a Carte Blanche following of the “Representatives” who have subsequently left the sinking ship, steered by rusted-on low payed IR lawyers. I can only hope the other members question their “Representatives” with less partisan views |
The alternative is a QF style divide and conquer approach. There would be nothing stopping VA giving the airframes to VARA, without consultation, and growing them at the expense of VA. Then subsequently using IR tactics to play both groups against each other to keep terms and conditions low.
This agreement allows for current F100 pilots to transfer to 737 on current base and rank under the VA EA (no redundancies). Any subsequent growth in positions must come in GDOJ order. For me, this is a good outcome for both sets of pilot groups and also the company as it means everyone eventually working under the same EA and AOC. |
Playing off between different groups doesn’t really matter does it? Didn’t the VA pilots get a 20% base salary pay reduction and ‘promise’ of targeted credit above minimum guarantee that hasn’t eventuated?
|
Ok Packvalve, everyone is wondering exactly how YOU would have done things if you were the “Representative” that would be a better outcome for both pilot groups? (And not just a better outcome for you)
Dont hold back Packvalve, outline every measure you would have taken in dealing with this. With the claims you are making against the union’s, you owe it to everyone to enlighten us all. (what are the odds for silence - or no answer??) , |
Originally Posted by turbantime
(Post 11282180)
The alternative is a QF style divide and conquer approach. There would be nothing stopping VA giving the airframes to VARA, without consultation, and growing them at the expense of VA. Then subsequently using IR tactics to play both groups against each other to keep terms and conditions low.
That's a big win if they have secured that guarantee, but flip side is, if not, then the threat will always come even after this 'win' |
My comment around ‘QF style’ isn’t a dig at you all in the QF group. Merely an alternative perspective to what could have transpired.
|
Interesting. Does this proposal (is it?) include a guarantee that Bain or any other future owners won't set up a second entity any time in the future the way Qantas have? That's a big win if they have secured that guarantee, but flip side is, if not, then the threat will always come even after this 'win' |
Originally Posted by Tabasco James
(Post 11282208)
Playing off between different groups doesn’t really matter does it? Didn’t the VA pilots get a 20% base salary pay reduction and ‘promise’ of targeted credit above minimum guarantee that hasn’t eventuated?
|
Wouldn’t a senior A320 captain be going backwards in pay?
|
All times are GMT. The time now is 10:05. |
Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.