Originally Posted by SandyPalms
(Post 11037216)
How many WA is taking is irrelevant.
|
Originally Posted by turbantime
(Post 11037219)
Confirmed once again that the general public can access these quarantine hotels for events. Wth is going on over there in WA???
But importantly, has it lead to any outbreaks? |
Originally Posted by WingNut60
(Post 11037220)
Then would you mind telling your mates to stop using it as part of your argument.
|
Originally Posted by Fonz121
(Post 11037218)
Listening to a bunch of conservative boomers is hardly the litmus test needed to form any kind of public opinion consensus on WA’s Covid policies.
|
Originally Posted by WingNut60
(Post 11037222)
More details please. Don't know anything about that.
But importantly, has it lead to any outbreaks? No outbreak yet but where is the risk management around that? Even the AMA advised against general public access to quarantine hotels. No other state does this, yet another hole in the cheese IMO. |
Originally Posted by SandyPalms
(Post 11037224)
Get knotted DH, they are not my mates, nor is it my argument.
But then, if you're silly enough to swoon after her then you're capable of believing anything. |
Originally Posted by turbantime
(Post 11037233)
One can go to high tea at the pan pacific hotel, or host a wedding/formal at another quarantine hotel.
No outbreak yet but where is the risk management around that? Even the AMA advised against general public access to quarantine hotels. No other state does this, yet another hole in the cheese IMO. The alternative being that quarantine hotels not be accessible for any other non-quarantine related purposes, not just restricted with regard grand events. Are you sure that's what's happening in all other states? |
Great news . We have a Pakistani sailer on the run in QLD. We have his Syrian crew mates asking for asylum. More pressure on the HQ service, less Australians to be allowed home.
|
Originally Posted by dysslexicgod
(Post 11033926)
Repatriate Australians from Covid19 hotspots around the world including Third world countries with no possibility of pre departure quarantine and/or dodgy screening or testing. A non - zero percentage will be infected.
Use airliners for repatriation. Cram infected and non infected people and crews in an aluminium tube for 20+ hours. On arrival, assume none of the crews and passengers are infected with Covid19. Transport passengers, assumed to be uninfected mind you, to central city hotels that are not purpose built quarantine facilities and inform them they must stay there for 14 days. Tend to the passengers needs - food, cleaning, laundry, etc. in the hotels using normal hotel staff and procedures - the staff go home to their families every night. What could possibly go wrong? This is the Feds essentially admitting they can't deliver the most basic of rights to citizens, which is unique in the world. I'm in a really unusual position, having visited Europe for work during the pandemic, visiting London and Berlin. I hate to break it, but life in those places ain't so different, people seem to imagine zombies in the street or something, not so! In London you need to order food or drinks via an app at your table, which was mostly outside, in Berlin masks were being aggressively enforced and you must scan in at bars. I was issued with N95 masks to use and constantly used alcohol hand cleaner. Coming back was really stressful, but quarantine was fine, I brought a lot of disinfectant wipes with me to clean the room down and some fabric disinfectant spray for the bed, my biggest thing was not having enough coffee lol. It was very confronting, watching people just getting on with their lives in Europe, compared to the cowering fear of people in hazmat suits here. I'm not sure which is the healthier state of mind. |
You have an intriguing question there about healthier state of mind. To which most would point to the healthier state of everything else.
|
Originally Posted by an.other
(Post 11037621)
......... I hate to break it, but life in those places ain't so different, people seem to imagine zombies in the street or something, not so!
It was very confronting, watching people just getting on with their lives in Europe, ............................ |
Originally Posted by WingNut60
(Post 11037653)
Did you visit any funerals while you were there? You might want to also factor in the 83,000 + who have died from Covid in Germany.
|
I'm in a really unusual position, having visited Europe for work during the pandemic, visiting London and Berlin. I hate to break it, but life in those places ain't so different, people seem to imagine zombies in the street or something, not so! In London you need to order food or drinks via an app at your table, which was mostly outside, in Berlin masks were being aggressively enforced and you must scan in at bars. I was issued with N95 masks to use and constantly used alcohol hand cleaner. |
Originally Posted by Climb150
(Post 11037662)
So 0.1% of the population? Run and hide the zombies are coming
80,000 lives lost is sad for sure, but context is everything. I acknowledge CV has killed people in large numbers, I just don’t buy the mass fear campaign. |
Originally Posted by ScepticalOptomist
(Post 11037699)
This has been the problem all along - people just see numbers with no context and allow themselves to be suckered in by fear mongering.
80,000 lives lost is sad for sure, but context is everything. I acknowledge CV has killed people in large numbers, I just don’t buy the mass fear campaign. There was always going to be a race between the virus and the vaccine, and those countries that understood that have suffered fewer deaths and costs. |
Originally Posted by ScepticalOptomist
(Post 11037699)
This has been the problem all along - people just see numbers with no context and allow themselves to be suckered in by fear mongering.
80,000 lives lost is sad for sure, but context is everything. I acknowledge CV has killed people in large numbers, I just don’t buy the mass fear campaign. In the case of Covid, it’s a bit clearer because we have examples of countries who have gone against the professional advice (Sweden, US and more recently India) and those who have adopted the most conservative approaches (Australia and NZ). I know where I would prefer to be. Australia has fared very well through this crisis. We are coming out with a strong economy, a healthy population and a health care system which retains capacity. Domestic life is almost entirely unaffected. No wonder most people are happy with the federal and state responses to Covid. |
Originally Posted by Tucknroll
(Post 11037704)
A lot of this has to do with an individual’s propensity to defer to experts. Either you agree with the overwhelming professional consensus on an issue or you look for the few dissenters.
In the case of Covid, it’s a bit clearer because we have examples of countries who have gone against the professional advice (Sweden, US and more recently India) and those who have adopted the most conservative approaches (Australia and NZ). I know where I would prefer to be. Australia has fared very well through this crisis. We are coming out with a strong economy, a healthy population and a health care system which retains capacity. Domestic life is almost entirely unaffected. No wonder most people are happy with the federal and state responses to Covid. New Zealand are far less conservative than Australia when it comes to crew quarantine. Yes I’ll raise this again. After all this is a pilot forum so get over it. I’ll continue to bang on about significant differences in how quarantine procedures apply between the two countries. Australia. 14 days no exceptions outside the Tasman bubble with a negative pcr test. New Zealand no quarantine required except if flown in from the USA (2 days and negative pcr) Asia no quarantine required. All Australian pilots should be outraged at the disparity. Whilst overseas both countries aircrew practice the same protocols so where is the science to back up the difference? There is none. Its heavy handed bureaucratic crap. All Aussie international pilots ffs write to your local state and federal members and make some noise. |
Originally Posted by Troo believer
(Post 11037724)
Incorrect.
New Zealand are far less conservative than Australia when it comes to crew quarantine. Yes I’ll raise this again. After all this is a pilot forum so get over it. I’ll continue to bang on about significant differences in how quarantine procedures apply between the two countries. Australia. 14 days no exceptions outside the Tasman bubble with a negative pcr test. New Zealand no quarantine required except if flown in from the USA (2 days and negative pcr) Asia no quarantine required. All Australian pilots should be outraged at the disparity. Whilst overseas both countries aircrew practice the same protocols so where is the science to back up the difference? There is none. Its heavy handed bureaucratic crap. All Aussie international pilots ffs write to your local state and federal members and make some noise. |
An inconvenience. What a stupid ignorant comment. Try 3-4 months of it. Air New Zealand none.
|
Originally Posted by Troo believer
(Post 11037735)
An inconvenience. What a stupid ignorant comment. Try 3-4 months of it. Air New Zealand none.
|
All times are GMT. The time now is 12:26. |
Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.