Melbourne airport delays, why?
Noticed this week its been predominately N/S runway operations and alot of inbound flights delayed as a result.
Today I have seen flights landing to the east, thats got to be pretty rare! can anyone shed some light on what's going on? cheers AK |
Where have you been? We’ve been using 09 for arrivals and 16 for departures for some time now. When the wind is right of course.
I think the reason for single runway ops has been done to death on other threads. More than 20kt crosswind or 5kt tailwind (no tailwind if the runway is other than dry) precludes ATC from nominating a particular runway. |
Why, oh why?
Because Australian airports are about parking and retail outlets. They're not about essential infrastructure and that attitude pervades to runway and taxyway infrastructure. Thirdworld ****hole, dressed up all pretty on the outside. |
Was chatting to cabin crew and they were spitting chips about Mel airport lol...
World's most liveable city eh? :rolleyes: cheers AK |
Where have you been? We’ve been using 09 for arrivals and 16 for departures for some time now. When the wind is right of course. |
Originally Posted by Porter
Why, oh why?
Because Australian airports are about parking and retail outlets. They're not about essential infrastructure and that attitude pervades to runway and taxyway infrastructure. |
Originally Posted by Gear in transit
(Post 10665201)
Lately 09 often has a tailwind component.... which one has to wonder why you aren't using 27? The crosswind has to be the same on both, although the Melbourne anemometer sure does some funky stuff when it comes to the crosswind!!
|
Originally Posted by The name is Porter
(Post 10665071)
Why, oh why?
Because Australian airports are about parking and retail outlets. They're not about essential infrastructure and that attitude pervades to runway and taxyway infrastructure. Thirdworld ****hole, dressed up all pretty on the outside. Aeronautical infrastructure, too expensive and takes too long to generate a return. Ain't privatisation just grand! Remember a monopoly isn't a bad thing when the government is dumb enough to give you one! |
Can we fix the Lizzy arrival onto 09?
Why do we have to be 6000 so far out? So many of the STARS (not just MEL) are so inefficient, getting the inbounds down low way to early, wasting fuel and time. |
Originally Posted by Roj approved
(Post 10665656)
Can we fix the Lizzy arrival onto 09?
Why do we have to be 6000 so far out? So many of the STARS (not just MEL) are so inefficient, getting the inbounds down low way to early, wasting fuel and time. |
Originally Posted by RAC/OPS
(Post 10665065)
. More than 20kt crosswind or 5kt tailwind (no tailwind if the runway is other than dry) precludes ATC from nominating a particular runway.
|
Anecdotally, I’ve heard that the crosswind/tailwind issue has to get past the Pilots’ union regardless of Airservices’ or CASA’s will (or lack thereof) to make any changes. And the union’s position is that it will not be inclined to change. I hopefully stand to be corrected.
|
Originally Posted by RAC/OPS
(Post 10665812)
Anecdotally, I’ve heard that the crosswind/tailwind issue has to get past the Pilots’ union regardless of Airservices’ or CASA’s will (or lack thereof) to make any changes. And the union’s position is that it will not be inclined to change. I hopefully stand to be corrected.
|
Originally Posted by The name is Porter
(Post 10665071)
Why, oh why?
Because Australian airports are about parking and retail outlets. They're not about essential infrastructure and that attitude pervades to runway and taxyway infrastructure. Thirdworld ****hole, dressed up all pretty on the outside. |
The majority of Australian airports are broken , the complete disregard for runway and terminal infrastructure is appalling to say the least .
I wish the government would seize a 50% stake in each airport and build the new runways and infrastructure. I live in hope that Brisbane is the only airport on track , |
Originally Posted by Gear in transit
(Post 10665817)
Not sure which union would need to approve, nor why they would even need to be involved. Its up to the pilot to accept it seeing they are the ones in the control seat. There's also more than one union......
|
Hi Capn - I'm listening!
Arguably Melbourne is a classic example of a monopoly sweating their assets - the aircraft all end up landing there anyway, so they get their money, and as far as I am aware the airport does not have to compensate the airlines for loss of profit due diversion or holding. Contrary to these posts, though, Melbourne has been doing a lot of taxiway building, voluntarily put in CAT III on RWY 16, and is actively planning a parallel runway. (To continue my parrying with you Capn, none of these things were required by CASA, although they all had to be approved by CASA!) It is good to see Melbourne ATC getting some use out of RWY 09 - for years I seem to recall they claimed they could not use it, and admittedly taxiing aircraft for departure 09 would be a pain in the A with having to cross 16. Obviously traffic pressure is having it's inevitable effect. So why the alleged delays? Melbourne has CAT II and CAT III approaches but only on 16 and 27, however if LAHSO cannot be used then it is a single runway airport. However Gatwick 2018 movements were 283,919 and Melbourne 245,766 so having only one runway is not the problem - perhaps our ATC procedures are not as slick as the UK - but that definitely is thread drift! |
Originally Posted by Mr Approach
(Post 10666525)
and is actively planning a parallel runway.
|
Originally Posted by Gear in transit
(Post 10666551)
Whoa whoa whoa, hold everything..... actively planning? Have the got the direction sorted yet??
|
Like the argument, it’s probably going to be circular!
|
All times are GMT. The time now is 20:21. |
Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.