|
Originally Posted by 73qanda
(Post 10378046)
It will be easy for them to point to the rules and say “ if only the pilot had adhered to the regulations and removed themselves from duty as was their responsibility, isn’t it tragic that they broke the rules and so many...”. If only the pilot had adhered to the regulations and removed themselves from duty as was their responsibility, isn’t it tragic that they broke the rules and so many... If only the LAME had adhered to the regulations and removed themselves from duty as was their responsibility, isn’t it tragic that they broke the rules and so many... If only the cabin crew had adhered to the regulations and removed themselves from duty as was their responsibility, isn’t it tragic that they broke the rules and so many... If only the Air Traffic Controller had adhered to the regulations and removed themselves from duty as was their responsibility, isn’t it tragic that they broke the rules and so many... "If wishes were horses, beggars would ride" |
You forgot: If only CASA had listened to the overwhelming evidence against CAO48.1. |
Originally Posted by angryrat
(Post 10399740)
Good work by the AFAP getting onto channel 10 news voicing concerns over the new 48.1 and fatigue. Keep at it! It also looked like VIPA got a gig too. Hopefully AIPA is going to ramp up into the news also. Shocking by CASA. Standard line that insinuates that these are standard rules worldwide. I guess CASA forgot to mention they have cherry picked the most advantageous rules for commercial operators and left out the protections for those cherry picked rules. CASA fast becoming the voice for the airlines. Chairman's lounge and Olivia inspired (does she still make the phone calls?) upgrades does a lot to smooth the wheels. The original amendment is nothing like the current, seems that corruption works well as senior public servants, regulators (yes even CASA) get invites and of course both sides of the circus in Canberra too.. |
Hopefully AIPA is going to ramp up into the news also. |
You hoped AIPA was also contributing in the media. I pointed out that they did in the Australian and other outlets.
It's only a dollar a day to read The Australian, the only newspaper that has a separate Aviation section. Hopefully those who lash out for a subscription got to enjoy the article. :ok: Having been advised in the past not to paste copies of subscriber articles to media such as Pprune, I'll leave it up to your resources to track down the article if you're even remotely interested in what AIPA said. |
|
| All times are GMT. The time now is 18:14. |
Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.