PPRuNe Forums

PPRuNe Forums (https://www.pprune.org/)
-   Australia, New Zealand & the Pacific (https://www.pprune.org/australia-new-zealand-pacific-90/)
-   -   QF A330 CIRCUITS at AV (https://www.pprune.org/australia-new-zealand-pacific/616318-qf-a330-circuits-av.html)

jjhews 13th Dec 2018 23:45

QF A330 CIRCUITS at AV
 
Just curious with anyone who works for QF this A330 doing circuits at AV right now, would this be base training? Attached https://cimg5.ibsrv.net/gimg/pprune....51bfdb956b.png

Gnadenburg 14th Dec 2018 01:11

Qantas circuits at Avalon always seem more like holding patterns. Right back to the 70's. Ansett, TAA and IPEC would belt around the circuit whilst QF would disappear out of view.

PW1830 14th Dec 2018 01:19

500ft circuits while avoiding the chicken sheds or dumbbells when the wind was all cross during S/O fo F/O endorsement were not holding patterns!

Iron Bar 14th Dec 2018 03:16

Base training, I think it would be for SO to FO trainees who don’t have the req company “handling pilot” experience.

Gnadenburg 14th Dec 2018 03:47


Originally Posted by PW1830 (Post 10335280)
500ft circuits while avoiding the chicken sheds or dumbbells when the wind was all cross during S/O fo F/O endorsement were not holding patterns!


Right then. Must have missed that. Went to school next to Avalon and it was neat to watch as a kid. Enjoyed base training in jets there years later in a pointless exercise considering simulator fidelity. Must admit, simulator is more difficult than real life, 500 ft circling approaches seemed a breeze with all the visual cues. In the simulator it was more a computer game but then again, that may have been because the requirement was to be on one engine. Seeing co-pilots these days struggle on two engine visual approaches I can just imagine the pilot shortage ( in Asia especially ) if these elemental skills still needed to be demonstrated.

mustafagander 14th Dec 2018 08:22

Gnadenburg, from personal experience I can say that it's about removing the "gee whiz" factor from your first aircraft flight usually the next morning.
No matter how good the sim, and they really do have excellent fidelity, an aircraft is different mentally. A big plus is that you get to hack the jet around like you will rarely do on line ops.

Veruka Salt 14th Dec 2018 14:17

It was FO upgrade training for 2 x SOs.

Conductor 15th Dec 2018 06:54


Originally Posted by Keg (Post 10335319)
Surprised they found a spare A330 today given some of the disruption of the last couple of days! QF42 CGK- SYD into PER; QF52 SIN- BNE into CNS I think; QF583 didn't leave SYD last night due to weather, etc.

I wonder if they'll do base training on the Dugong or 787 if people decide to vertically promote on that?

That is correct.

Street garbage 16th Dec 2018 03:15

Gnadenberg- is that a wind up?
Simulator easier than real life- how much koolaid have you had intravenously?

Gnadenburg 16th Dec 2018 04:55

Think I said the opposite to your interpretation.


itsnotthatbloodyhard 16th Dec 2018 05:29


Originally Posted by Street garbage (Post 10336668)
Gnadenberg- is that a wind up?
Simulator easier than real life- how much koolaid have you had intravenously?

Not sure how you get that from

Must admit, simulator is more difficult than real life

clark y 16th Dec 2018 21:51

Serious question- Do other airlines in Australasia do base training in the real aircraft these days?
As for the SO to FO upgrade, surely these individuals would have had the shiny jet syndrome beaten out of them after years of plying the world in heavy jets. Other airlines just chuck brand new newbies in the RH seat of 180.seat jets.

That being said, it would be fun to go and have a crack at a few circuits in a 150 ton toy.

Veruka Salt 16th Dec 2018 21:55

Cathay (and presumably Dragonair) still do it. Hong Kong CAD requirement.

wheels_down 16th Dec 2018 23:36

Tiger do it for the Airbus to Boeing crews converting.

Virgin dont.

clark y 17th Dec 2018 01:08

So not a regulatory requirement then, more an in house rule.

mrdeux 17th Dec 2018 03:46

Back in the GoDs, I recall 5 hours of circuits at Avalon in the 747-200.

Slezy9 17th Dec 2018 04:09

Air NZ don't on the jet fleet. First landing is with pax on board.

engine out 17th Dec 2018 04:48

They started to look at doing it again as it was quicker to put a few trainees and TREs in an aircraft for a few hours than take up sim space and lose the TRE for a few days on a trip whilst they did stage 1 of the training.

Street garbage 18th Dec 2018 04:38


Originally Posted by itsnotthatbloodyhard (Post 10336708)


Not sure how you get that from

My error.
I should have asked why do you think the sim is harder than real life?

JPJP 18th Dec 2018 04:49


Originally Posted by Veruka Salt (Post 10337246)
Cathay (and presumably Dragonair) still do it. Hong Kong CAD requirement.

A likely reason - The only people that would work for Cathay and Dragonair are either cadets, or the incredibly inexperienced. A Cat D simulator removes any requirement for Base training for suitably qualified pilots.


Originally Posted by Slezy9
Air NZ don't on the jet fleet. First landing is with pax on board.

Egzactly :E


All times are GMT. The time now is 17:29.


Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.