PPRuNe Forums

PPRuNe Forums (https://www.pprune.org/)
-   Australia, New Zealand & the Pacific (https://www.pprune.org/australia-new-zealand-pacific-90/)
-   -   737 saved by Emergency Arresting System. Essendon could do with it (https://www.pprune.org/australia-new-zealand-pacific/616118-737-saved-emergency-arresting-system-essendon-could-do.html)

Centaurus 7th Dec 2018 00:38

737 saved by Emergency Arresting System. Essendon could do with it
 
https://www.pprune.org/rumours-news/...-6-2018-a.html
It doesn't take much to imagine the potential for disaster if an aircraft such as a big corporate jet (or even a lightie like a Citation or KingAir?) went off the southern end of Essendon Runway 17 into the Tullamarine Freeway during a high speed abort or land long in wet weather. Same with Runway 26 into the Mattthews Avenue tram tracks end.

Several years ago this scribe suggested to Essendon Airport Authority an EMAS system be considered for the end of these runways. Predictably, there was no reply; meaning no interest.
The above link shows a graphic example of an EMAS save that happened yesterday in USA where EMAS is installed at many airports.

With the already millions of dollars spent on expanding Essendon Fields precinct in anticipation of future movements,the time is well overdue to consider spending money on the flight safety environment rather than still more commercial businesses?

machtuk 7th Dec 2018 00:55

I agree Centy but we are talking about business owners & or councils here who just happen to operate a drome, they wont spend a cent more than they need to rip off as many as possible, legally of course:-) Nice notion you have but sorry you are skating on thin ice there when it comes to the single biggest factor that drives the human race in all endeavors....$$$$$$$$, safety always comes second at all costs:-)

4 Holer 7th Dec 2018 01:34

Airports in USA are owned by the US Government as there deemed essential services/National security required and run by FAA. USA has no Airways charges for aircraft the Air traffic service is FREE to users. The same as most US Infrastructure like roads as the country collects Federal tax which pays these services.

TBM-Legend 7th Dec 2018 01:52

Not quite correct about US airports.Los Angeles International Airports own and control LAX and VNY for example. Both very expensive place to operate from especially land and building rentals.

​​​​​​

Los Angeles World Airports (LAWA) is the City of Los Angeles department that owns and operates Los Angeles International (LAX) and Van Nuys (VNY) general aviation airports. Both play an integral role in helping to meet the Southern California regional demand for passenger, cargo and general aviation service. Both airports make a distinct contribution to the strength of the system as it provides a high level of safety, security and service for its customers, communities and stakeholders.

Many airports fit this category.

Burbank installed the RESA trap after the last incident when a WN B737 overran the runway and into the fence etc.

Why Australia doesn't do this I don't know.

4 Holer 7th Dec 2018 01:56

LAX Airports are owned by the Government, the City of Los Angeles ? There are landing fee's no airways charges ......

TBM-Legend 7th Dec 2018 02:23

I did not mention airways charges. The City of Los Angeles is Not the US Govt.

73qanda 7th Dec 2018 02:49

It’s seems to me that LAWA is not a bank only interested in making profits for shareholders and bonus’s to execs though which validates 4 Holers comments to a large degree.

Why Australia doesn't do this I don't know.
Because we sold our airports to company’s that are only interested in making profits for shareholders and bonus’s for execs?
It’s pretty simple really, we haven’t treated our airports as though they have a broad influence on the economic health of the nation and as a result they under perform in that area.

Australopithecus 7th Dec 2018 03:20

Does anyone here know what happens when the EMAS is penetrated by an aircraft struggling to get airborne due to dud performance calculations? Thinking about EK on MEL RWY 16 which seems to me to be another installation candidate. I am curious if such an event has yet happened on an EMAS runway.

Captain Nomad 7th Dec 2018 04:13


Burbank installed the RESA trap after the last incident when a WN B737 overran the runway and into the fence etc.

Why Australia doesn't do this I don't know.
Because a significant incident like that has not happened here and never will...:E

Centaurus 7th Dec 2018 12:49


Because a significant incident like that has not happened here and never will...[img]https://www.pprune.org/images/smilies/evil.gif
Love it, because it reminded me of a similar comment made to me in the mid 1970's when working on Nauru. Those who are familiar with the runway on Nauru will know the departure end (no pun intended) of Runway 30 ends in a 10 metre boulder filled drop into the ocean. That is after you cross the road passing five metres from the runway threshold.
During a flight safety conference it was suggested that concrete be poured over and between the jagged boulders of the sea wall to make a rudimentary sort of ski slope into the water to minimise the chances of aircraft wings being ruptured by the current boulders in event of an over-run into the sea.

The then DCA, a political appointee who knew nothing about aeroplanes, knocked back the idea saying that Air Nauru which had been operating all of three years with its two F28 Fokker Fellowships, had the best safety record in the world as it had never had a crash.

MarkerInbound 7th Dec 2018 16:35


Originally Posted by Australopithecus (Post 10329922)
Does anyone here know what happens when the EMAS is penetrated by an aircraft struggling to get airborne due to dud performance calculations? Thinking about EK on MEL RWY 16 which seems to me to be another installation candidate. I am curious if such an event has yet happened on an EMAS runway.

There are about 110 runway ends with EMAS installed in the USA. As of thIs summer there had been 13 uses of an EMAS system since so now we're up to 14. In the FAA Advisory Circular regarding EMAS there is discussion about aircraft landing short in the EMAS but I don't see anything about low departing aircraft. The installation is supposed to bring an aircraft that normally operates off that runway to stop in the area available from 70 knots. The installations that I've seen are sloped from the runway end. It would be designed differently if the area available was 800 v 400. The other options are to purposely shortened the TORA and LDA to make part of the runway end with insufficient RSA part of the RSA.

Any airport having air carrier operations must meet FAR Part 139 rules no matter who owns and operates the the airport. A few decades back the FAA started the idea of a Runway Safety Area of at least a 1000 feet beyond the runway. It doesn't need to be paved like a stopway but should support an aircraft when dry without significant damage and not have any obstacles. EMAS is a work around for airports that don't have open ground off the end of a runway.

JPJP 7th Dec 2018 18:49


Originally Posted by Centaurus (Post 10330311)
Love it, because it reminded me of a similar comment made to me in the mid 1970's when working on Nauru. Those who are familiar with the runway on Nauru will know the departure end (no pun intended) of Runway 30 ends in a 10 metre boulder filled drop into the ocean. That is after you cross the road passing five metres from the runway threshold.
During a flight safety conference it was suggested that concrete be poured over and between the jagged boulders of the sea wall to make a rudimentary sort of ski slope into the water to minimise the chances of aircraft wings being ruptured by the current boulders in event of an over-run into the sea.

The then DCA, a political appointee who knew nothing about aeroplanes, knocked back the idea saying that Air Nauru which had been operating all of three years with its two F28 Fokker Fellowships, had the best safety record in the world as it had never had a crash.


Similar to this accident in Jamaica. Embankment, followed by a drop, then a road, and finally into the rocks.

https://cimg5.ibsrv.net/gimg/pprune....982b40b5d.jpeg
https://cimg6.ibsrv.net/gimg/pprune....5c8d491a6.jpeg

Very lucky result.

puff 8th Dec 2018 04:21

Another airport in this region that could really do with it is Queenstown

Traffic_Is_Er_Was 8th Dec 2018 12:54


the Air traffic service is FREE to users.
NOTHING is free. Somebody is paying for it, in this case everybody, whether they use it or not. As for roads, maybe the Interstates, but State roads are funded by the states taxing their constituents just like here.

maggot 15th Dec 2018 06:28


Originally Posted by 4 Holer (Post 10329895)
Airports in USA are owned by the US Government as there deemed essential services/National security required and run by FAA. USA has no Airways charges for aircraft the Air traffic service is FREE to users. The same as most US Infrastructure like roads as the country collects Federal tax which pays these services.

How very socialist

Traffic_Is_Er_Was 16th Dec 2018 01:09


Airports in USA are owned by the US Government
Major airports in Australia are still "owned" by the government. They are just "leased" (ie the govt sold 99-year leases) to private operators. That's why there are Federal Police on site, not state, and the Feds can still dictate terms of operation, to a degree.

Vref+5 16th Dec 2018 07:39

The government will mandate the installation of a RESA at Essendon, immediately after the first aircraft goes off the end into peak hour traffic resulting in multiple fatalities. Just like the Takarta airbag recall, which became a mandatory recall only after the first death in Australia

Ozgrade3 16th Dec 2018 09:47

Why is Oz seemingly the only country that uses gable markers to delineate the runway strip.

Traffic_Is_Er_Was 16th Dec 2018 11:51

Did you get an answer when you asked the same question 13 years ago?

LeadSled 16th Dec 2018 13:09


Originally Posted by Captain Nomad (Post 10329937)
Because a significant incident like that has not happened here and never will...:E

Dear Captain,
A rather interesting statement, given the aircraft we have had off the end of runways in Australia, and not just foreign operators.

Back in the G.O.Ds, if my memory serves me correctly, Ansett had two in one day, one was 24 in Perth, don't remember the other, maybe Mt Isa.

I could also quote a number of cases involving Metros etc, but we don't normally include such in our safety stats, to preserve our "world renowned" safety record.

As for Sydney, we have had large aircraft of the end of 07, 25 and (now) 34L, DC-10, B747 and B707 respectively.

- -----not happened here and never will.-----??

How many airlines operate in and out of Australia??
Tootle pip!!

PS: ATC in USA is funded by passenger head taxes for airlines, and a fuel excise for the rest ---- it is not free. For a person who is allegedly in US, 4Holer seems to be quite remarkably lacking in knowledge of the US, aviation-wise.


All times are GMT. The time now is 17:22.


Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.