PPRuNe Forums

PPRuNe Forums (https://www.pprune.org/)
-   Australia, New Zealand & the Pacific (https://www.pprune.org/australia-new-zealand-pacific-90/)
-   -   Jetgo Mid Air Emergency (https://www.pprune.org/australia-new-zealand-pacific/550861-jetgo-mid-air-emergency.html)

Pilot58 8th Nov 2014 07:51

Jetgo Mid Air Emergency
 
Anymore info on Jetgo engine explosion leading to emergency landing.

TWOTBAGS 8th Nov 2014 07:57

How about a fact Jack
 
Precautionary shutdown on a non rev flight due dropping oil quantity. When the engineer opened the cowl it left a bit of a mess on the ground. Crew did exactly what they are trained for. Missed all pre schools & nursing homes, however it did leave a bit of 2380 over northern NSW.
Engineers identified the problem, part replaced and the plane flew the next morning.

Explosion, No
Emergency Landing, No

The most excited person was the approach controller who had the Jetgo Pan followed by the Virgin Pan straight after requesting an immediate return.

onehitwonder 8th Nov 2014 08:05

Wasn't on the CASA proving flight was it?

TWOTBAGS 8th Nov 2014 08:16

No CASA were not on board, the proving flight was Friday and the team passed with flying colours again, Gladstone is next with a few more in the pipe for next year. Sydney recruitment will be ongoing.

Pilot58 8th Nov 2014 08:34

Plane is still grounded at Brisbane with damaged engine I was messages just then

ohallen 8th Nov 2014 08:39

Goodness what is happening here no questions on Virgin Pan.

Must be a busy night somewhere.

TWOTBAGS 8th Nov 2014 08:46

Well 58 why dont you look here https://flightaware.com/live/flight/VHJZG for fact before you make a bigger goose of yourself.

Fact, the plane was fixed in a couple hours once the part arrived from Sydney.
Fact, the plane has flown 6 sectors since and is perfectly serviceable.

Pilot58 8th Nov 2014 08:52

Thanks twobags what was the part that failed?

OzSync 8th Nov 2014 09:40

I hear there actually may be a bit more to this story...

onehitwonder 8th Nov 2014 10:14

Do elaborate

Pilot58 8th Nov 2014 10:46

Ozsync I heard the same and was sent a pm on here about more.

I have asked teebags what part failed but he must be fixing it as we speak

Defenestrator 8th Nov 2014 11:44

Sounds like the Thronomister failed. It happens. Though I'm tipping a couple of contributing pundits can come up with far more dramatic details.

:rolleyes:

Pilot58 8th Nov 2014 21:26

Teebags wouldn't a Pan put it under a emergency landing ?

TWOTBAGS 8th Nov 2014 23:19

I cant comment on the reason behind the oil loss as it is the subject to several investigations.

To answer your question how about this....

When a PAN PAN - message is sent, there's no immediate danger for the safety of the passengers, crew or aircraft.

MAYDAY, however is an indication of a dangerous situation that has risen and immediate action is needed.

So NO it was not an emergency, it was a precautionary measure. Realistically the aircraft could have held for several hours if required or not even told anyone and continued and no one would be the wiser. If anyone learnt from someone else it would be this incident Airnorth Regional E170 near Darwin on Mar 24th 2014, engine shut down in flight | AeroInside

They did not tell anyone, no pan, yet it blew the crap out of the engine and was on the ground for 10 days and it created a hoohar of sorts Airnorth even had to cross hire Alliance to maintain schedule integrity. Jetgo on the other hand are transparent to the incident, the company safety systems are robust enough and so are the crew actions and policy, and the aircraft was serviceable within hours of the replacement part being sourced.

To infer here in this forum that there is something untoward happening, when the facts have been provided in a transparent manner, leads the proponent of that rumour down the slippery path of what happened in another thread concerning the same company.

As far as the company and the regulator are concerned its now time to await the report and see what was the root cause then take steps (if any are required) to mitigate the issue and prevent it from occurring again.

Skystar320 9th Nov 2014 00:00

Must be loosing a fair amount of $$$ if only 27 passengers were on board! :eek:

The Banjo 9th Nov 2014 00:21

Pilot58,

Extract from Jepp Pacific, STate Rules and Procedures-Australia Page 1030

MAYDAY — My aircraft and its occupants are threatened by grave and imminent danger and/or I require immediate assistance

PAN PAN — I have an urgent message to transmit concerning the safety of my aircraft or other vehicle or of some person on board or within sight but I do not require immediate assistance.

As it was a precautionary shutdown and he had a spare engine that is functioning normally...........

The Mayday is reserved for when Dick Smith puts out a media release :p

Defenestrator 9th Nov 2014 00:32

He's a troll Twotbags and a libellous one at that. Responding just feeds the grubs ego.

Pilot58 9th Nov 2014 03:07

This is a rumour network defenestrator, we are all trolls hiding behind fake names you turkey.

All things I had said are rumours that I have heard

ANCPER 9th Nov 2014 03:16

Skystar 320,

what, losing money on a 75% load factor? :eek:

red_dirt 9th Nov 2014 03:32

Wow so many Jetgo haters out there!!! Given them a break.

At least they are having a go and actually making progress which is more than I can do for a lot more out there.

Vista Jet
Gold Airways
Connect Jet
Terry Byrt mark 1, 2, 3 and 4


All times are GMT. The time now is 20:06.


Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.