|
300m runway extension for WLG
So the council have finally put $1m into the study for a 300m runway extension to the northern runway end into Evans bay. The airport authority also putting in $1m.
Wellington.scoop.co.nz » Airport to seek approval for 300 metre $300m northern extension to runway According to some the passenger figures to support new flights to International destinations with such carriers as Emirates and China Southern could be on the cards. But Air NZ and Qantas don't seem very interested in increasing capacity from WLG or adding new international destinations. Does seem to be a good thing but at a million dollars per metre of runway it does seem bloody pricey! Does anyone remember the Qantas 747SP days into WLG? |
What the airport company of course fail to mention in any of their media briefs is that whilst they might want to build 300m more, whether that gives them 300m of runway is another thing. Four letters, two words and a number. RESA, "if practicable" and 240.
|
Water wings is totally correct. All this would really do is make a currently unsafe airport safer for existing operations. In practical terms it won't provide much additional useable runway length.
Furthermore, even if additional runway was provided who exactly is going to use it? Long haul ops out of WLG are a pipe dream. CBR and WLG are similar sizes, but CBR is a couple of hours flying time close to most markets. If CBR can't justify longhaul ops I can't see how WLG could. ( Don't be fooled by the fact that CHC has some longhaul ops, it is the inbound gateway for longhaul tourists to the South Island - WLG would be an inbound gateway to what exactly? ... WLG and the Wairarapa vineyards? ) |
Another thing, given that some aircraft types are already performance restricted off 34 due to OEI climb performance and Newlands ridge, would it not be more practical to reclaim land to the south and extend in that direction?
|
'Gateway to what?' You clearly haven't experienced the jewel of the Pacific ... Tawa
|
or Wainuiomata
|
I would imagine it is much more difficult (that is, expensive) to build a runway extension into Cook Strait, than into calm and sheltered Evans Bay.
|
Ah Tawa. I don't think any other town can lay claim to having quite so many churches. I live in Linden just north of Tawa so can vouch for its boring-ness :)
Good points about its current state, currently 34 has got 130m "starter EXTN" at the north end, I know this is only for takeoff but is this something that could form part of a RESA? Is it really deemed unsafe as it is right now? What actual useful runway length would they get out of 300m extension? On the subject, I've noted those ramp shaped objects at the end of 34, are these designed to launch an overrunning aircraft over SH1 /trolley bus wires to a graceful ditching in Evans Bay? |
Are they not for protecting the LLZ aerials?
|
They should extend it into cook strait and put a ski jump at the end...give everyone departing to the south that sea harrier feeling...:E
|
Tell them they're dreaming.
|
I wish you Kiwis would use 4-letter identifiers... I was wondering why the **** Walgett would want a runway extension :rolleyes:
|
geez not this **** again i wish you aussies would learn the 3 letter ones.
walgett is wge. |
Air NZ and QF aren't jumping up and down because as it stands they have the narrow bodies in this part of the world that service WLG day in day out. if it suddenly became available to larger aircraft then they would have to compete against more carriers than they currently do.
|
The reality is that if the WB machines don't arrive it will be Air NZ, QF and VA passengers that will have to pay for the extension that they don't need. Airport companies don't take a loss!
|
Waren9,
that's the IATA code (which I didn't know myself until I checked this morning). I've always known it as WLG which is the navaids. |
that's the IATA code the op used an iata code. horatio got his tits in a tangle. not sure why. |
that's the IATA code (which I didn't know myself until I checked this morning). I've always known it as WLG which is the navaids. The reality is that if the WB machines don't arrive it will be Air NZ, QF and VA passengers that will have to pay for the extension that they don't need. Airport companies don't take a loss! kiwiandrew Water wings is totally correct. All this would really do is make a currently unsafe airport safer for existing operations. In practical terms it won't provide much additional useable runway length. Furthermore, even if additional runway was provided who exactly is going to use it? Long haul ops out of WLG are a pipe dream. CBR and WLG are similar sizes, but CBR is a couple of hours flying time close to most markets. If CBR can't justify longhaul ops I can't see how WLG could. ( Don't be fooled by the fact that CHC has some longhaul ops, it is the inbound gateway for longhaul tourists to the South Island - WLG would be an inbound gateway to what exactly? ... WLG and the Wairarapa vineyards? ) And for some current and presumably most future types, Newlands ridge is no longer the performance impediment it used to be due to the availability of alternative single engine departure procedures. |
I took a quick look down the forum before I posted and seen AKL and MEL so decided to use the IATA code. Life goes on.
|
On the subject, I've noted those ramp shaped objects at the end of 34, are these designed to launch an overrunning aircraft over SH1 /trolley bus wires to a graceful ditching in Evans Bay? |
| All times are GMT. The time now is 18:54. |
Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.