PPRuNe Forums

PPRuNe Forums (https://www.pprune.org/)
-   Australia, New Zealand & the Pacific (https://www.pprune.org/australia-new-zealand-pacific-90/)
-   -   JetStar A321 - insufficient stopping distance (https://www.pprune.org/australia-new-zealand-pacific/471700-jetstar-a321-insufficient-stopping-distance.html)

angelorange 14th Dec 2011 16:35

JetStar A321 - insufficient stopping distance
 
Misdirected data check led to Jetstar A321 take-off incident

V1 160KIAS and 450m remaining runway at Lift off point.

safelife 14th Dec 2011 16:38

Bookmarking? Like in books made of paper?
Does anyone still do that?
I thought it's all FOVE nowerdays (LPC)...

Sunfish 14th Dec 2011 17:20

Third Jetstar incompetence report in the last week. This is not good.

- Unstabilised approach.

- Incorrect configuration

..and now this.

fl610 14th Dec 2011 18:26

Should they be grounded?:ooh:

Sarcs 14th Dec 2011 19:49

The report for this one is here:

http://www.atsb.gov.au/media/2229778/ar2009052.pdf

Keg 14th Dec 2011 23:12


V1 160KIAS and 450m remaining runway at Lift off point.
Lol. You've obviously never taken off in a 744 at MTOW on a hot day in LAX. :ok:

PNM 14th Dec 2011 23:29

Or an A340-300 out of JNB!

Sub Orbital 15th Dec 2011 00:56

You're kidding me
 
V1 of 160 kts??!!@You're kidding me, right. Any common sense here?
Tell me ANY commercial jet that has a V1 of 160 kts.
What ever happened to basic common sense checks?

Artificial Horizon 15th Dec 2011 01:03

Pretty sure I used a V1 of 160kts on an A320 out of Sydney the other day, looking at my Perf Manual now, 10kts Headwind, 60 degree Flex, Flap 1+F will give a V1 of 160 kts on RWY34L at Sydney. Why exactly is this so absurd???

Oxidant 15th Dec 2011 01:20

B757-200, TOW 116 tons, Flap 5. V1/Vr 164kts...............................

Red Jet 15th Dec 2011 01:54

B777-300ER at MTOW, V1 usually up around 172-177 KIAS

THRidle 15th Dec 2011 01:54

A330, TOW 224 T, V1 166.

flyingins 15th Dec 2011 02:04

Sub Orbital
No one is kidding you, but clearly you don't fly A320/A321s. Or any other large commercial jet, for that matter.

On a runway as long as DRW's (or SYD 34L/16R, BNE 01/19 etc etc) V1/VR combinations of 160 knots (or even a little higher) are both common-place and perfectly within the design parameters of the aircraft's RTO performance, particularly when using un-balanced field length calculations.

In fact the tyres on the 320/321 are rated to 195 knots, so as long as the brakes can handle the energy (which they can), the only limiting factors become TORA, ASDA, obstacles in the splay, reduced thrust parameters and runway condition.

The issue here isn't the V1 speed itself, it's the fact that it was predicated on a full length departure but the crew mistakenly took off from an intersection instead, thus making V1 and the chosen thrust setting (assumed temp or "Flex") invalid.

Common sense is relative to the knowledge you have, I'm afraid.

Bula 15th Dec 2011 02:39

a cock up .. yes.. but by the grace of god on that one departure the Captain didn't need to yell "STOP!"....

As for the rest of it.... runway 27 in YMML and Runway 34R YSSY...... I'm sure there is not much more than 450m when we unstick (maybe a little more on 34R with the 200m displaced threshold but god it looks like it could make a bad day worse), as with most places that have limiting runways.

Lady luck was looking out that day, but wouldn't have been the first T/O with incorrect V speeds. Just ask the guys in AKL who clean the rubber of the runway, they still get nervous whenever they see a Singapore 747 line up at the far end. I was in stitches when I overheard the quiver in that guys voice. I think they vacated none the less :)

Global Xpress 15th Dec 2011 02:52

While we're having a pissing contest, Dash 8 200, Lord Howe V1/VR 87kt:ok:

Jack Ranga 15th Dec 2011 03:00


Lol. You've obviously never taken off in a 744 at MTOW on a hot day in LAX.
One of the most amusing flying experiences I've had. Too much fuel loaded on the 743 (QF26, LA-AKL). Stationary somewhere on the aerodrome, throttled up burning excess fuel before T/O. Gold :D

novice110 15th Dec 2011 04:14

To those quoting high V1 speeds at high weights -
What is the field length ?

So a V1 of 160kts from the intersection (2316m TODA) is normal ?

Maybe this is what sub orbital was referring to in 'common sense checks'.

Oxidant 15th Dec 2011 05:03

"Maybe" he should have chosen his words with more care?


You're kidding me

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

V1 of 160 kts??!!@You're kidding me, right. Any common sense here?
Tell me ANY commercial jet that has a V1 of 160 kts.
What ever happened to basic common sense checks?

gobbledock 15th Dec 2011 05:47

one minute to midnight
 
TICK TOCK TICK TOCK

A37575 15th Dec 2011 10:26

Let's put this into proper perspective.

All this blood sweat and tears in Pprune and the media about a couple of relatively minor incidents investigated by ATSB.

Now if the media had unfetterd access to all the QAR reports (unstable approaches, excess airspeeds, flap/gear speed exceedances, high sink rates on final, excessive float, landing long etc), that stream in regularly each day to the domestic and international airline flight safety departments, can you just imagine the screaming headlines about dangerous practices in Australian airlines. Huge bubbles of complacency would burst and we would never hear the end of it all.


All times are GMT. The time now is 03:09.


Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.